Dick, H. W. 1965 Picuris Pueblo Excavations. Fort Burgwin Research Center. Submitted to USDI National Park Service, Southwest Region, Contract No. Dl-14-10-0333-1348. Copies available from National Technical Information Service No. PB177047.Google Scholar

Dick, H. W., Wolfman, D., Schaafsma, C. F., Wolfman, M. 1966 Introduction to Picuris Archaeology. Manuscript on file, Fort Burgwin Research Center and Laboratory of Anthropology Library, Museum of New Mexico, Santa Fe.Google Scholar

Eighmy, J. L., and Sternberg, R. S. 1990 Archaeomagnetic Dating. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1965 A Taos Phase Pithouse on Arroyo Seco, New Mexico (with Wolfman, M. L. and Dick, H. W.). Series in Anthropology No. 1. Adams State College, Alamosa, Colorado.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1968 Review of Dendrochronology in Mexico by Scott, S. D.. American Antiquity 33: 115–116. Preliminary Report on Excavations an UA-1. Submitted to Departamento de Monumentos Prehispanicos, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1971 Secular Variation and Archaeomagnetism (with R. L. DuBois). Oklahoma Anthropological Society Newsletter 19(9): 1–3.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel Archaeomagnetic Investigations in Mesoamerica: 1968-1970 (with DuBois, R. L.). Submitted to Departamento de Monumentos Prehispanicos, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1972 Archaeomagnetic Investigations in Mesoamerica: 1971 (with DuBois, R. L.). Submitted to Departamento de Monumentos Prehispanicos, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1973 Archaeomagnetic Investigations in Mesoamerica: 1972 (with R. L. DuBois). Submitted to Departamento de Monumentos Prehispanicos, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City. A Re-evaluation of Mesoamerican Chronology: A.D. 1-1200. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1974 Blanchard Springs Caverns Radiocarbon Dates. Field Notes No. 119-120, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel Arkansas Archeological Society, Fayetteville. Arkansas Stela Goes Home but Destruction of Mayan Sites Continues. Field Notes No. 122, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel Arkansas Archeological Society, Fayetteville. In 1976 Dan Wolfman contributed a number of entries to Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by Hunter, D. E. and Whitten, P. (Harper & Row, New York): Dating, Absolute, p. 116; Dendrochronology, p. 119; Obsidian Hydration, p. 289; Paleomagnetism and Archaeomagnetism, p. 292; Physical-Chemical Methods of Dating, p. 304; Potassium-Argon Method of Dating, p. 311; Radiocarbon Dating, pp. 329-330; Thermoluminescence, p. 386; Time in Archaeology, p. 388; Varve Analysis, p. 399; Willard Libby, p. 247. Recent Research on Archeological Dating Methods in Arkansas. Field Notes No. 146, pp. 2–4.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel Arkansas Archeological Society, Fayetteville. The Potential for Tree-Ring Research in Arkansas (with D W Stahle). Field Notes No. 146, pp. 5–9.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel Arkansas Archeological Society, Fayetteville. Archaeomagnetic Dates from the Baca Float Sites. Appendix G. In Excavations in the Middle Santa Cruz River Valley, Southeastern Arizona, by D Doyel. Contribution to Highway Salvage Archaeology in Arizona No. 44. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1978 An Inundated Archaeomagnetic Sample. Appendix I. In The Mechanical and Chemical Effects of Inundation atAbiquiu Reservoir, by Schaafsma, C. F.. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Effects of Inundation on Alpha-Recoil Track Samples from the Abiquiu Reservoir Region. Appendix II (with T. M. Rolniak). In The Mechanical and Chemical Effects of Inundation at Abiquiu Reservoir by C. F. Schaafsma. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico. The Potential for Archeomagnetic Dating in the Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Site. Submitted to the National Park Service. Copies available from Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1979 Alpha-Recoil Track Dating: Problems and Prospects (with T. M. Rolniak). In Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Archaeometry and Archaeological Prospection. Archaeo-Physika 10: 512–521.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel Archeomagnetic Dating in Arkansas. In Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Archaeometry and Archaeological Prospection. Archaeo-Physika 10: 522–533. Archeological Inventory of the Buffalo National River. Research Report No. 18. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1980 Archeomagnetic Dating. In Excavation, Data Interpretation, and Report on the Zebree Homestead Site, Mississippi County, Arkansas, edited by Morse, D. F. and A, P.. Morse. Arkansas Archeological Survey. Submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis District. Copies available from Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1982 The Arkansas Ozarks (with Raab, L. M., Fritz, G., Ray, R., and Sabo, G. III). In ,4 State Plan for the Conservation of Archeological Resources in Arkansas, edited by Davis, H. A., pp. NW1-24. Research Series No. 21. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville. Archeomagnetic Results from the Lewisville Site, Denton County, Texas. Submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Copies available from Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville. Archeomagnetic Dating in Arkansas and the Border Areas of Adjacent States. In Arkansas Archeology in Review, edited by Trubowitz, N. and Jeter, M., pp. 277–300. Research Series No. 15. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1983 Fechas Definidas por Arqueomagnetismo. In Introduction a la Arqueologia de Copdn, Honduras. Tomo 1, pp. 546–549. Instituto Hondureno de Antropologia e Historia, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Los Resultados Arqueomagneticos de las Muestras Recogidas en el Peru en 1982 (with Dodson, R. E.). Submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cultura, Lima. Introduction to “Archaeomagnetism of Baked Clays.” In Geomagnetism of Baked Clays and Recent Sediments, edited by Creer, K. M., P. Tucholka, and C. E. Barton, pp. 76–77. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Some Specific Comments for “Archaeomagnetism of Baked Clays.” In Geomagnetism of Baked Clays and Recent Sediments, edited by Creer, K. M., P. Tucholka, and C. E. Barton, pp. 182–183. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1984 Geomagnetic Dating Methods in Archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 7, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 363-^58. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel Cedar Grove Chronometrics. In Cedar Grove: An Inter-disciplinary Investigation of a Late Caddo Farmstead in the Red River Valley, edited by Trubowitz, N. L., pp. 257–262. Research Series No. 23. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1985 The Potential for Archaeological Tree-Ring Dating in Eastern North America (with D W. Stahle). In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 279–302. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1986 Los Resultados Arqueomagneticos de las Muestras Recogidas en el Peru en 1983 (with Dodson, R. E.). Submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cultura, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1987 Los Resultados Arqueomagneticos de las Muestras Recogidas en Mexico en 1982. Submitted to Departamento de Monumentos Prehispanicos, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1988 Archeomagnetic and Radiocarbon Dating Results. In Standridge: Caddoan Settlement in a Mountain Environment, edited by Early, A. M., pp. 154–156. Research Series No. 29. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1989 The Santa Fe Relief Route: Initial Results and Data Recovery Plan, Santa Fe County, New Mexico (with Maxwell, T. D, Phillips, D. A., Jr., Gaunt, J., and Toll, M.). Laboratory of Anthropology Note No. 496. Museum of New Mexico, Santa Fe. In 1990 Dan Wolfinan contributed three sections to Archaeomagnetic Dating, edited by Eighmy, J. L. and S, R.. Sternberg (University of Arizona Press, Tucson.: Archaeomagnetic Dating in Arkansas and the Border Areas of Adjacent States—II, pp. 237-260; Mesoamerican Chronology and Archaeomagnetic Dating, A.D. 1-1200, pp. 261-308; Retrospect and Prospect, pp. 313–364.Google Scholar

Wolfman, Daniel 1994 Jemez Mountains Chronology Study (with contributions by M. D. Glascock, R. Kunselman, J. B. Moore, H. Neff, C. M. Stevenson, A. Wilmer). Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico. Submitted to U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Contract No. 53-8379-9-14. Copies available from Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, Santa Fe.Google Scholar