Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T02:01:22.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gallinazo Maize from the Chicama Valley, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert McK. Bird  and
Junius B. Bird
Robert McK. Bird
Affiliation:
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2345 Tower Grove Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110
Junius B. Bird
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large sample of Gallinazo cobs from Huaca Prieta is classified using a set of five variables. Some types of Gallinazo maize recovered there seem to have been new to the Peruvian North Coast; some types of the preceding Salinar phase are not known from this site. Further changes occur in the Chicama-Viru area when Moche influence appears. In several ways Gallinazo maize seems more related to maize occurring today further north and east than to modern highland or coastal maize to the southeast.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 325 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bird, J. B. 1948 Preceramic cultures in Chicama and Viru. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 4:21–28.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B. 1951 South American radiocarbon dates. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 8:37–49.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK. 1970 Maize and its cuituraJ and natural environment in the sierra of Hudnuco, Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Botany, University of California, Berkeley. University Microfilms (71-9767), Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK. 1977 The evolution and influences of the maize of the Intermediate Area. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, April, 1977, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK. 1978 Archaeological maize from Peru. Maize Genetics Cooperation News Letter 52:90–92.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK. 1979 The evolution of maize: a new model for the early stages. Maize Genetics Cooperation News Letter 53:53–54.Google Scholar
Bird, R. McK., and Goodman, M. M. 1978 The races of maize V: grouping maize races on the basis of ear morphology. Economic Botany 31:471–481.Google Scholar
Galinat, W. C. 1970 The cupule and its role in the origin and evolution of maize. University of Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 585:1–12.Google Scholar
Grobman, A., Bonavia, D., and Kelley, D. H. with Mangelsdorf, P. C. and Camara-Hernandez, J. 1977 Study of pre-ceramic maize from Huarmey, north central coast of Peru. Harvard University, Botanical Museum Leaflets 25:221–242.Google Scholar
Grobman, A., Salhuana, W., and Sevilla, R. with Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1961 Races of maize in Peru. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publication 915, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hernandez, X. E. 1973 Genetic resources of primitive varieties of Mesoamerica, Zea spp., Phaseolus spp., Capsicum spp.and Cucurbita spp. In Survey of crop genetic resources in their centres of diversity, first report, AGP:CGR/73/7, edited by Frankel, O. H., pp. 76–115. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationsand the International Biological Programme, New York.Google Scholar
Johnston, G. S. 1966 Manifestations of teosinte and “Tripsacum” introgression in corn belt maize. The Bussey Institutionof Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Longley, A. E., and Kato, T. A. 1965 Chromosome morphology of certain races of maize in Latin America. Centro International deMejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo, Research Bulletin 1:1–112.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C, and Camara-Hernandez, J. 1967 Prehistoric maize from Huaca Prieta, Peru. Maize Genetics Cooperation News Letter 41:48.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C, and Camara-Hernandez, J. n.d. Prehistoric maize from Huaca Prieta. Unpublished manuscript plus notes and photographs in possessionof the author.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C, MacNeish, R. S., and Galinat, W. C. 1967 Prehistoric wild and cultivated maize. In The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Vol. 1, edited by Byers, D. S., pp. 178–200. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Nickerson, N. H. 1953 Variation in cob morphology among certain archaeological and ethnological races of maize. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 40:79–111.Google Scholar
Pozorski, S. G. 1976 Prehistoric subsistence patterns and site economics in the Moche Valley, Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin. University Microfilms (76-26686), Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ramirez, E. R., Timothy, D.H., Diaz B., E., and Grant, U.J. with Nicholson C, G., Anderson, E., and Brown, W.L. 1960 Races of maize in Bolivia. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publication 474, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Sehgal, S. M. 1963 Effects of teosinte and “Tripsacum” introgression in maize. The Bussey Institution of Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Timothy, D. H., Hatheway, W. H., Grant, U. J., Torregroza, M., Sarria V., D., and Varela A., D. 1963 Races of maize in Ecuador. National Academy of Sciences-National Resources Council Publication975, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Timothy, D. H., V., B. Pefia, and E., R. Ramirez with Brown, W. L. and Anderson, E. 1961 Races of maize in Chile. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publication 847, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Towle, M. A. 1952 Descriptions and identifications of the Viru plant remains. In Cultural stratigraphy in the Virii Valley, northern Peru, edited by Strong, W.D. and C. Evans, Jr., pp. 352–356. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Towle, M. A. 1954 Plant remains. In Early Ancon and Early Supe culture, edited by Willey, G. R. and Corbett, J. H., pp. 130–138. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar