Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:32:08.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Ohio Valley Maize Histories: New Dates from the Crossroads of the Midcontinent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2024

Aaron R. Comstock Open the ORCID record for Aaron R. Comstock [Opens in a new window]  and
Robert A. Cook
Aaron R. Comstock*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
Robert A. Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
*
Corresponding author: Aaron R. Comstock; Email: aaron.comstock@louisville.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The transition to maize agriculture frames important cultural shifts in the Eastern Woodlands. However, the tempo and mode of this transition are unclear, particularly when analytical techniques are not standard across the region. In this article, we present evidence of directly dated maize macrobotanical fragments from the Turpin site in southwest Ohio that date between cal AD 552–649 and 684–994. These dates add to current dialogues on the spread of maize in the American Midcontinent and help further situate the Middle Ohio Valley as a cultural crossroads through which people and ideas flowed. We echo suggestions that, to refine our understanding of the introduction of maize into the region, we must develop pan-regional analytical standards and create multiple working hypotheses at a variety of scales.

Resumen

Resumen

La transición a la agricultura del maíz perfila importantes cambios culturales en los Eastern Woodlands. Sin embargo, no son claros el ritmo y la forma de esta transición, particularmente, debido a que las técnicas analíticas a lo largo de la región no están estandarizadas. En este artículo, se presenta evidencia de la datación directa y calibrada de fragmentos macrobotánicos de maíz del periodo 552-649 dC y 684-994 dC del sitio de Turpin en el suroeste de Ohio. Estas fechas se suman a los debates actuales sobre la dispersión del maíz en el continente medio americano, contribuyendo a situar aún más el valle medio del Rio Ohio como la sede de una confluencia cultural a través de la cual fluyeron diversas personas e ideas. Apoyamos las sugerencias de que para refinar a mayor detalle nuestra comprensión sobre la introducción del maíz en la región, debemos desarrollar procedimientos analíticos estandarizados para toda la región y crear múltiples hipótesis de trabajo en varias escalas.

Keywords

maizeFort AncientWoodland periodMiddle Ohio ValleymaízFort Ancientperíodo Woodlandvalle medio del Rio Ohio
Type
Report
Information
American Antiquity , First View , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adair, Mary J. 2012. Refining Plains Woodland Chronology. Plains Anthropologist 57(223):183–228. https://doi.org/10.1179/pan.2012.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, Mary J., Duncan, Neil A., Young, Danielle N., Bozarth, Steven R., and Lusteck, Robert K.. 2022. Early Maize (Zea mays) in the North American Central Plains: The Microbotanical Evidence. American Antiquity 87(2):333–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2021.152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Rebecca K., Kooiman, Susan M., Clark, Caitlin A., and Lovis, William A.. 2018. Earliest Microbotanical Evidence for Maize in the Northern Lake Michigan Basin. American Antiquity 83(2):345–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2018.10.Google Scholar
Bender, Margaret M., Baerreis, David A., and Steventon, Raymond L.. 1981. Further Light on Carbon Isotopes and Hopewell Agriculture. American Antiquity 46(2):346–353. https://doi.org/10.2307/280213.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, T. C. 1890. The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses. Science 15(366):92–96.Google Scholar
Comstock, Aaron R. 2017. Climate Change, Migration, and the Emergence of Village Life on the Mississippian Periphery: A Middle Ohio Valley Case Study. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Comstock, Aaron R, and Cook, Robert A. 2021. Contextualizing Mississippian Migration in Early Fort Ancient Villages: Preliminary Results from Recent Excavations at the Turpin Site (33Ha19). Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 46(1):53–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/48629433.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert A. 2017. Continuity and Change in the Native American Village: Multicultural Origins and Descendants of the Fort Ancient Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert A., and Douglas Price, T.. 2015. Maize, Mounds, and the Movement of People: Isotope Analysis of a Mississippian/Fort Ancient Region. Journal of Archaeological Science 61:112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.03.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Gary W., Smith, David G., and Bowyer, Vandy E.. 1997. Dating the Entry of Corn (Zea mays) into the Lower Great Lakes Region. American Antiquity 62(1):112–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/282382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Thomas E., Hedman, Kristin M., Simon, Mary L., Fort, Mathew A., and Witt, Kelsey E.. 2020. Isotopic Confirmation of the Timing and Intensity of Maize Consumption in Greater Cahokia. American Antiquity 85(2):241–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.7.Google Scholar
Greenlee, Diana. 2002. Accounting for Subsistence Variation among Maize Farmers in Ohio Valley Prehistory. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1943. The Fort Ancient Aspect: Its Cultural and Chronological Position in Mississippi Valley Archaeology. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1952. Prehistoric Cultures of the Ohio Valley. Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 61:185–195.Google Scholar
Hanselka, J. Kevin, and Vierra, Bradley J.. 2017. A Pan-Regional Overview of Archaic Agriculture in the Southwest. In The Archaic Southwest : Foragers in an Arid Land, edited by Vierra, Bradley J., pp. 269–295. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Hart, John P. 2022. Tracing Maize History in Northern Iroquoia through Radiocarbon Date Summed Probability Distributions. Open Archaeology 8(1):594–607. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, John P., Brumbach, Hetty Jo, and Lusteck, Robert. 2007. Extending the Phytolith Evidence for Early Maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and Squash (Cucurbita sp.) in Central New York. American Antiquity 72(3):563–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/40035861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, John P., and Lovis, William A.. 2013. Reevaluating What We Know about the Histories of Maize in Northeastern North America: A Review of Current Evidence. Journal of Archaeological Research 21(2):175–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-012-9062-9.Google Scholar
Hart, John P., Lovis, William A., and Anne Katzenberg, M.. 2021. Early Maize in Northeastern North America: A Comment on Emerson and Colleagues. American Antiquity 86(2):425–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.93.Google Scholar
Hart, John P., Thompson, Robert G., and Brumbach, Hetty Jo. 2003. Phytolith Evidence for Early Maize (Zea mays) in the Northern Finger Lakes Region of New York. American Antiquity 68(4):619–640. https://doi.org/10.2307/3557065.Google Scholar
Oehler, Charles. 1973. Turpin Indians: A Revised Report of the Findings of the Cincinnati Museum of Natural History's Archaeological Exploration of the Turpin Site, Hamilton County, Ohio 1946–1949. Popular Publication Series 1. Cincinnati Museum of Natural History, Ohio.Google Scholar
Pauketat, Timothy. 2018. Thinking through the Ashes, Architecture, and Artifacts of Ancient East St. Louis. In Revealing Cahokia's Urbanism: Rediscovery and Large-Scale Excavations of the East St. Louis Precinct, edited by Emerson, Thomas E., Koldehoff, Brad H., and Brennan, Tamira K., pp. 463–486. Illinois State Archaeological Survey. Urbana.Google Scholar
Perino, Gregory. 1964. Possible Origin of Mississippian Jar. Central States Archaeological Journal 11(4):123–126.Google Scholar
Piperno, Dolores R., Ranere, Anthony J., Holst, Irene, Iriarte, Jose, and Dickau, Ruth. 2009. Starch Grain and Phytolith Evidence for Early Ninth Millennium B.P. Maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. PNAS 106(13):5019–5024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812525106.Google Scholar
Redmond, Brian G. 2012. Terminal Late Woodland Mortuary Ceremonialism, Social Differentiation, and Long Distance Interaction in Northern Ohio: New Evidence from the Danbury Site. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 37(1):99–140. https://doi.org/10.1179/mca.2012.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, Paula J., Austin, William E. N., Bard, Edouard, Bayliss, Alex, Blackwell, Paul G., Ramsey, Christopher Bronk, Butzin, Martin, et al. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62(4):725–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41.Google Scholar
Riggs, Rodney E. 1998. Ceramics, Chronology and Cultural Change in the Lower Little Miami River Valley, Southwestern Ohio, circa 100 B.C. to circa A.D. 1650. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F., and Dancey, William S.. 2000. The Late Woodland Period in Southern Ohio: Basic Issues and Prospects. In Late Woodland Societies: Tradition and Transformation across the Midcontinent, edited by Emerson, Thomas E., McElrath, Dale L., and Fortier, Andrew C., pp. 583–612. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1990. Childers and Woods: Two Late Woodland Sites in the Upper Ohio Valley, Mason County, West Virginia. Archaeological Report No. 200. Program for Cultural Resource Assessment, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Simon, Mary L. 2014. Reevaluating the Introduction of Maize into the American Bottom and Western Illinois. In Reassessing the Timing, Rate, and Adoption Trajectories of Domesticate Use in the Midwest and Great Lakes, Occasional Papers 1, edited by Raviele, Maria E. and Lovis, William A., pp. 93–134. Midwest Archaeological Conference, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
Simon, Mary L. 2017. Reevaluating the Evidence for Middle Woodland Maize from the Holding Site. American Antiquity 82(1):140–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2016.2.Google Scholar
Simon, Mary L., Hedman, Kristin M., and Emerson, Thomas E.. 2021. Interpreting Isotopic and Macrobotanical Evidence for Early Maize in the Eastern Woodlands: A Response to Hart and Colleagues. American Antiquity 86(2):428–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.83.Google Scholar
Simon, Mary L., Hollenbach, Kandace D., and Redmond, Brian G.. 2021. New Dates and Carbon Isotope Assays of Purported Middle Woodland Maize from the Icehouse Bottom and Edwin Harness Sites. American Antiquity 86(3):613–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.117.Google Scholar
Staller, John E., Tykot, Robert H., and Benz, Bruce F. (editors). 2006. Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Prehistory, Linguistics, Biogeography, Domestication, and Evolution of Maize. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Wood, W. Raymond 1999. The Jaguar Gorget: “The Missouri State Artifact.” Missouri Archaeological Society Quarterly 16(2):8–11.Google Scholar
Wymer, Dee Ann. 1992. Trends and Disparities: The Woodland Paleoethnobotanical Record of the Mid-Ohio Valley. In Cultural Variability in Context: Woodland Settlements of the Mid-Ohio Valley, edited by Seeman, Mark F., pp. 65–76. MCJA Special Paper No. 7. Kent State University Press, Kent.Google Scholar
Wymer, Dee Ann. 1994. The Social Context of Early Maize in the Mid-Ohio Valley. In Corn and Culture in the Prehistoric New World, edited by Johannessen, Sissel and Hastorf, Christine A., pp. 411–426. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar