Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T21:48:03.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Frequencies, Proportions and Diversity: A Response to Cannon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven A. Rosen
Steven A. Rosen*
Affiliation:
Archaeological Survey of Israel, POB 586, Jerusalem, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent article based on ethnoarchaeological research in Mesoamerica, Cannon has suggested that presence/absence statistics are generally preferable to percentage statistics. The case presented is weak, and seems only to reflect a specific instance rather than a general rule.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 409 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Cannon, Aubrey 1983 The Quantification of Archaeological Assemblages: Some Implications for Behavioral Inferences. American Antiquity 48:785-792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, David Hurst 1978 The Awful Truth About Statistics in Archaeology. American Antiquity 43:231-244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar