Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T19:20:54.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sandal Types and Archaic Prehistory on the Colorado Plateau

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Phil R. Geib*
Affiliation:
Navajo Nation Archaeology Department, Northern Arizona University, Box 6013, Flagstaff, AZ 86011

Abstract

Perishable artifacts provide an alternative to projectile points for examining spatial patterns in Archaic material culture between northern and southern portions of the Colorado Plateau of the North American Southwest. This is so because they possess a potential great variety of specific construction and design attributes and can be directly dated to establish independent chronologies of development. The analysis and dating of a collection of warp-faced plain weave sandals from Chevelon Canyon, Arizona demonstrates the potential utility of perishable artifacts to our understanding of prehistory. The collection provides an important first sample of early Archaic footwear for the southern Colorado Plateau. AMS dating reveals that the oldest Chevelon Canyon sandal (8300 ± 60 B.P.) is 1,500 years earlier than the oldest directly dated sandal of this style on the northern Colorado Plateau. Most of the Chevelon Canyon sandals date from 7500 to 6000 cal. B.C., contemporaneous with open-twined sandals on the northern Colorado Plateau. This study provides another contrast in forager material culture between southern and northern portions of the plateau during the early Archaic, prior to ca. 5700 cal. B.C. After this time, the plain weave sandal style was adopted on the northern Colorado Plateau but not because of population replacement.

Resumen

Resumen

Los artefactos perecederos proveen una altemativa a las puntas de projectil para examinarpatrones espaciales en cultura material arcaica entre las porciones norte y sur de la Meseta de Colorado en el Suroeste norteamericano. Los artefactos perecederos potencialmente poseen una gran variedad de atributos de construcción y diseño y pueden ser fechados directamente para establecer cronologías independientes. El análisis y fechamiento de una colección de sandalias tejidas encontradas en el Cañón Chevelon, Arizona, demuestran la utilidad de estos artefactos para entender la prehistoria. La coleccion provee una muestra importante de calzado arcaico en el sur de la Meseta de Colorado. Fechados de AMS revelan que la sandalia más antigua en esta colección (8300 ± 60 a.p.) es 1500 años más temprana que aquélla de estilo similar datada en el norte de la Meseta de Colorado. La mayoria de las sandalias del Cañón Chevelon datan entre 7500 y 6000 cal. a. C. y son contemporáneas con sandalias de cordado abierto norteñas. Este estudio provee otro contraste en la cultura material de recolectores arcaicos entre estas regiones, antes de 5700 cal. a.C. Después de esta fecha, la sandalia de tejido liso de los llanos es adoptada en el norte de la Meseta de Colorado, pero no por reemplazo de población.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adovasio, J.M. 1986 Artifacts and Ethnicity: Basketry as an Indicator of Territoriality and Population Movements in the Prehistoric Great Basin. In Anthropology of the Desert West: Essays in Honor of Jesse D. Jennings, edited by Condie, C.J. and Fowler, D.D., pp. 4389. Anthropological Paper No. 110. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Adovasio, J.M., and Pedler, D.R. 1994 A Tisket, a Tasket: Looking at the Numic Speakers through the “Lens” of a Basket. In Across the West: Human Population Movement and the Expansion of the Numa, edited by Madsen, D.B. and Rhode, D., pp. 114—123. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Agenbroad, L.D., Mead, J.I., Mead, E.D., and Elder, D. 1989 Archaeology, Alluvium, and Cave Stratigraphy: The Record from Bechan Cave, Utah. Kiva 54: 335351.Google Scholar
Andrews, R.L., Adovasio, J.M., and Carlisle, R.C. 1986 Perishable Industries of the Dirty Shame Rockshelter, Malheur County, Oregon. Anthropological Paper No. 34. Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugune.Google Scholar
Ambler, J.R. 1996 Dust Devil Cave and Archaic Complexes of the Glen Canyon Area. In Glen Canyon Revisited, by Geib, P.R., pp. 4052. Anthropological Paper No. 119. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Briuer, EL. 1977 Plant and Animal Remains from Caves and Rock Shelters of Chevelon Canyon Arizona: Methods for Isolating Cultural Depositional Processes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E. 1983 Territoriality among Human Foragers: Ecological Models and an Application to Four Bushman Groups. Current Anthroplogy 24: 4766.Google Scholar
Connolly, T.J., and Cannon, W.J. 1999 Comments on “America's Oldest Basketry.” Radiocarbon 41: 309313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croes, D.R. 1977 Basketry from the Ozette Village Archaeological Site: A Technological, Functional, and Comparative Study. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Croes, D.R. 1989 Prehistoric Ethnicity on the Northwest Coast of North America, an Evaluation of Style in Basketry and Lithics. In Research in Anthropological Archaeology, edited by Whallon, R., pp. 101130. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Deegan, A.C. 1993 Anasazi Fibrous Sandal Terminology. Kiva 59: 4964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geib, P.R. 1989 A Descriptive Report of the 1988 Bullfrog Archaeological Survey, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Northern Arizona University Archaeological Report No. 1038. Manuscript on file, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, National Park Service, Denver.Google Scholar
Geib, P.R. 1994 Appendix II. The Spurr Survey. In Glen Canyon Revisited: Summary and Conclusions of Recent Archaeological Investigations in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, edited by Geib, P.R., pp. II-l—11-18. Northern Arizona University Archaeological Report No. 1047. Manuscript on file, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, National Park Service, Denver.Google Scholar
Geib, P.R. 1996 AMS Dating of Plain-Weave Sandals from the Central Colorado Plateau. Utah Archaeology 9: 3553.Google Scholar
Geib, P.R., Coulam, N.J., Clark, V.H., Hays-Gilpin, K.A., and Goodman, J. 1999 Atlatl Rock Cave: Findings from the Investigation and Remediation of Looter Damage. Navajo Nation Archaeological Report No. 93-121. Manuscript on file, Navajo Nation Archaeology Department, Window Rock.Google Scholar
Geib, PR., and Davidson, D. 1994 Anasazi Origins: A Perspective from Preliminary Work at Old Man Cave. Kiva 60: 191202.Google Scholar
Geib, PR., and Davidson, D. 2000 Old Man Cave. Manuscript on file at Bureau of Land Management, San Juan Resource Area, Blanding.Google Scholar
Hays-Gilpin, K.A. 1998 Epilogue: ”…this sandal business.” In Prehistoric Sandals from Northeastern Arizona. TheEarlH. Morris and Ann Axtell Morris Research, by Hays-Gilpin, K.A., Deegan, A.C., and Morris, E.A., pp. 121126. Anthropological Paper No. 62. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hays-Gilpin, K.A., Deegan, A.C., and Morris, E.A. 1998 Prehistoric Sandals from Northeastern Arizona. The Earl H. Morris and Ann Axtell Morris Research. Anthropological Paper No. 62. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hewitt, N.J. 1980 Fiber Artifacts. In Cowboy Cave, edited by Jennings, J.D., pp. 4996. Anthropological Paper No. 104. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Holmer, R.N. 1978 A Mathematical Typology for Archaic Projectile Points of the Eastern Great Basin. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Holmer, R.N. 1986 Common Projectile Points of the Intermountain West. In Anthropology of the Desert West: Essays in Honor of Jesse D. Jennings, edited by C.J. Condie and D.D. Fowler, pp. 90115. Anthropological Paper No. 110. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Hurst, C.T. 1947 Excavation of Dolores Cave—1946. Southwestern Lore 13: 817.Google Scholar
Hurst, C.T. 1948 The Cottonwood Expedition 1947: A Cave and a Pueblo Site. Southwestern Lore 14: 419.Google Scholar
Huckell, B.B. 1996 The Archaic Prehistory of the North American Southwest. Journal of World Prehistory 10: 305373.Google Scholar
Irwin-Williams, C. 1973 The Oshara Tradition: Origins ofAnasazi Culture. Contributions in Anthropology 5(1). Paleo Indian Institute, Eastern New Mexico University, Portales.Google Scholar
Huckell, B.B. 1979 Post-Pleistocene Archaeology 7000-2000 B.C. In Southwest, edited by Ortiz, A., pp. 3112. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 9, WC. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Jennings, J.D. 1980 Cowboy Cave. Anthropological Paper No. 104. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Kidder, A.V., and Guernsey, S.J. 1919 Archaeological Explorations in Northeastern Arizona. Bulletin No. 65. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Lindsay, A.J. Jr., Ambler, J.R., Stein, M.A., and Hobler, P.M. 1968 Survey and Excavation North and East of Navajo Mountain, Utah 1959-1962. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin No. 45. Northern Arizona Society of Science and Art, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Lipe, W.D. 1960 1958 Excavations, Glen Canyon Area. Anthropological Paper No. 44. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Matson, R.G. 1991 Origins of Southwest Agriculture. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Sackett, J.R. 1982 Approaches to Style in Lithic Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59112.Google Scholar
Sackett, J.R. 1985 Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity 50: 151159.Google Scholar
Schroedl, A.R. 1976 The Archaic of the Northern Colorado Plateau. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Schroedl, A.R., and Coulam, N.J. 1994 Cowboy Cave Revisited. Utah Archaeology 7: 134.Google Scholar
Sharrock, F.W. 1964 1962 Excavations, Glen Canyon Area. Anthropological Paper No. 73. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Sharrock, F. W., Day, K. C., and Dibble, D. S. 1963 1961 Excavations, Glen Canyon Area. Anthropological Paper No. 63. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Smiley, F. E., and Robins, M.R. (editors) 1997 Early Farmers in the Northern Southwest: Papers on Chronometry, Social Dynamics and Ecology. Animas-La Plata Archaeological Project Research Paper No. 7. Department of Anthropology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., and Reimer, P.J. 1993 Extended 14C Data Base and Revised CALIB 3.0 14C Age Calibration Program. Radiocarbon 35: 215230.Google Scholar
Talbot, R.K., Richens, L.D., Baker, S.A., and Janetski, J.C. 1999 Broken Arrow Cave (42Ka4356): 1997 Testing Results. Technical Series No. 99-5. Museum of Peoples and Cultures, Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Weltfish, G. 1932 Problems in the Study of Ancient and Modern Basket Makers. American Anthropologist 34: 108117.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. 1983 Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 48: 253276.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. 1989 Style and Changing Social Relations between the Individual and Society. In The Meaning of Things. Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 5663. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Wobst, M. 1977 Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange. In For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, edited by Cleland, C.E., pp. 317342. Anthropological Paper No. 61. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar