Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 28
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Sabiha, Noor-E. Salim, Ruhul Rahman, Sanzidur and Rola-Rubzen, Maria Fay 2016. Measuring environmental sustainability in agriculture: A composite environmental impact index approach. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 166, p. 84.


    Slater, Joyce and Yeudall, Fiona 2015. Sustainable Livelihoods for Food and Nutrition Security in Canada: A Conceptual Framework for Public Health Research, Policy, and Practice. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Veisi, Hadi Rezaei, Mohammad Ebrahim Khoshbakht, Korous Kambuozia, Jafar and Liaghati, Houman 2015. An assessment of the impact of watershed programmes on agricultural sustainability in Hamedan province, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 308.


    ZHOU, Shu-dong Mueller, Felix Burkhard, Benjamin CAO, Xing-jin and HOU, Ying 2013. Assessing Agricultural Sustainable Development Based on the DPSIR Approach: Case Study in Jiangsu, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, Vol. 12, Issue. 7, p. 1292.


    Baginetas, Konstantinos N. 2012. Regional Development.


    Baginetas, Konstantinos N. 2012. Regional Development.


    Baginetas, Konstantinos N. 2011. Agricultural and Environmental Informatics, Governance and Management.


    Tiewtoy, Sanidda Clemente, Roberto S. Perret, Sylvain R. Singh Babel, Mukand and Weesakul, Sutat 2011. IRRIGATION SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED PROJECTS IN THA CHIN BASIN, THAILAND. Irrigation and Drainage, Vol. 60, Issue. 3, p. 296.


    Wang, Shuying 2011. 2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD). p. 2009.

    Gómez-Limón, José A. and Sanchez-Fernandez, Gabriela 2010. Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators. Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, Issue. 5, p. 1062.


    Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti Rodrigues, Izilda Aparecida Buschinelli, Cláudio Cesar de Almeida and de Barros, Inácio 2010. Integrated farm sustainability assessment for the environmental management of rural activities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 229.


    Gómez-Limón, José A. and Riesgo, Laura 2009. Alternative approaches to the construction of a composite indicator of agricultural sustainability: An application to irrigated agriculture in the Duero basin in Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90, Issue. 11, p. 3345.


    Ommani, A. R. Chizari, M. Salmanzadeh, C. and Hosaini, J. Faraj Allah 2009. Predicting Adoption Behavior of Farmers Regarding On-Farm Sustainable Water Resources Management (SWRM): Comparison of Models. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 33, Issue. 5, p. 595.


    Walter, Christof and Stützel, Hartmut 2009. A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems (I): Identifying the relevant issues. Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, Issue. 5, p. 1275.


    Walter, Christof and Stützel, Hartmut 2009. A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems (II): Evaluating impact indicators. Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, Issue. 5, p. 1288.


    Caballero, Rafael Gil, Ángel and Fernández-Santos, Xavier 2008. An Experts Survey on Sustainability Across Twenty-Seven Extensive European Systems of Grassland Management. Environmental Management, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 190.


    2008. Agroecological Economics.


    Zhen, Lin Zoebisch, Michael A. Chen, Guibao and Feng, Zhiming 2006. Sustainability of farmers' soil fertility management practices: A case study in the North China Plain. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 79, Issue. 4, p. 409.


    Mendoza, Guillermo A and Prabhu, Ravi 2003. Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 174, Issue. 1-3, p. 329.


    Zhen, Lin and Routray, Jayant K. 2003. Operational Indicators for Measuring Agricultural Sustainability in Developing Countries. Environmental Management, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 34.


    ×
  • Currently known as: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems Title history
    American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, Volume 9, Issue 1-2
  • June 1994, pp. 45-50

A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems

  • C. O. Stockle (a1), R.I. Papendick (a2), K.E. Saxton (a2), G.S. Campbell (a3) and F.K. van Evert (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300005555
  • Published online: 30 October 2009
Abstract
Abstract

Sustainable agriculture has gained acceptance as a conceptual approach for shaping farming systems of the future. All definitions of sustainable agriculture include food productivity, food safety, resource protection, quality of life and environmental quality. However, the sustainability of a wide range of farming systems has been judged only subjectively. Currently there are no scientific criteria to evaluate the sustainability of a specific farming system. We propose a framework for evaluating the relative sustainability of a farming system using nine attributes: profitability, productivity, soil quality, water quality, air quality, energy efficiency, fish and wildlife habitat, quality of life, and social acceptance. Each attribute is scored and then weighted in a way that is subjective and dependent on the judgment of the evaluating team, but that must be expressed numerically. The scoring must be based on quantifiable constraints within each attribute. Constraints can be quantified by direct measurement, which is already true for those related to profitability, productivity, water quality and energy efficiency. Constraints that are not readily measurable will need other evaluation techniques, including expert opinion and computer simulation models.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2.R.E. Dunlap , C.E. Beus , R.E. Howell , and J. Waud . 1992. What is sustainable agriculture? An empirical examination of faculty and farmer definitions. J. Sustainable Agric. 3:539.

3.C.B. Flora 1992. Building sustainable agriculture: A new application of farming systems research and extension. J. Sustainable Agric. 2:3749.

5.D. Neher 1992. Ecological sustainability in agricultural systems: Definition and measurement. J. Sustainable Agric. 2:5161.

8.R. Senanayake 1991. Sustainable agriculture: Definitions and parameters for measurement. J. Sustainable Agric. 1:728.

9.D.C. Taylor 1990. On-farm sustainable agriculture research: Lessons from the past, directions for the future. J. Sustainable Agric. 1:4387.

12.G.A. Youngs , G.A. Goreham , and D.L. Watt . 1991. Classifying conventional and sustainable farmers: Does it matter how you measure? J. Sustainable Agric. 2:91115.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0889-1893
  • EISSN: 1478-5498
  • URL: /core/journals/american-journal-of-alternative-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: