Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:42:53.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing students' preparedness towards sustainability in US and European undergraduate agricultural curricula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Bruno Borsari ,
Malcolm F. Vidrine  and
Steven Doherty
Bruno Borsari*
Affiliation:
Department of Parks and Recreation/Environmental Education, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, Slippery Rock, PA 16057
Malcolm F. Vidrine
Affiliation:
Division of Sciences, Louisiana State University at Eunice, PO Box 1129, Eunice, LA 70535.
Steven Doherty
Affiliation:
Department of Parks and Recreation/Environmental Education, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, Slippery Rock, PA 16057
*
B. Borsari (bruno.borsari@sru.edu).
Get access

Abstract

This work focused on the evaluation of undergraduate curricula in agriculture for a selected group of institutions from Louisiana and Texas in the US, and France and Italy. The primary research objective was pursued through the measurement of knowledge acquisition in sustainable agriculture principles of undergraduate students as they were approaching the completion of their curriculum. Quantitative data were collected through the administration of a test to eight samples (n = 20) of senior students from each university participating in the study. An analysis of frequencies for every test question indicated the strengths but also the weaknesses that still exist in the agricultural curricula when students' academic achievement was measured. Every institution acknowledged the emerging sustainable agriculture paradigm in brochures, catalogs and web sites. There is a need for ameliorating agricultural curricula as the long-term productivity of farms is threatened by market policies uncontrollable by single producers and by the manipulation of resources that frequently accelerate environmental degradation. Therefore, we show opportunities for the strengthening of study programs to incorporate sustainable agriculture principles in undergraduate curricula.

Keywords

assessmentcurriculumevaluation instrumentsustainable agriculture
Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 188 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ablemann, M. 1993. From The Good Earth. Harry N. Abrams Incorporated, New York, NY.Google Scholar
2.Altieri, A. M., and Francis, C.A. 1992. Incorporating agroecology into the conventional agricultural curriculum. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7(1,2):89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Altieri, A. M., and Rosset, P.. 1996. Agroecology and the conversion of large-scale conventional systems to sustainable management. International J. Environ. Studies 50:165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bennet, R., Rock, D., and Wang, M.. 1991. Equivalence of free response and multiple choice items. J. Educ. Measurement 28:77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Berry, W. 1996. The Unsettling of America. Culture and Agriculture. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
6.Beus, C. E., and Dunlap, R.E.. 1990. Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate. Rural Sociol. 55(4):590–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bezdicek, D. F., and DePhelps, C.. 1994. Innovative approaches for integrated research and educational programs. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 9:3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Borsari, B. 1998. Sustainable agriculture: Concepts and educational applications. In Borsari, B. and Vidrine, M.F. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture Seminar Proceedings. Vol. 1. Low Input Agriculture: Feasible Alternatives to Conventional Agricultural Practices. Louisiana State University at Eunice Press, Eunice, LA. p. 14–19.Google Scholar
9.Borsari, B., and Vidrine, M.F.. 2000. An Evaluation Tool for Improving Undergraduate Curricula in Agriculture. Sustainable Agriculture—Fertile Ground for Growth in the Agricultural Sciences. J. College Sci. Teaching 29(4):235–240.Google Scholar
10.Callicott, B. J. 1990. The metaphysical transition in farming: From the Newtonian mechanical to the Eltonian-ecological. J. Agric. Ethics 3:36–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
12.Collins, R. J., and Dunne, A.J.. 1996. Utilizing multilevel capstone courses in an integrated agribusiness curriculum. Agribusiness 12(1):105–112.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.El Titi, A., and Landes, H.. 1990. Integrated farming systems of Lautenbach: A practical contribution toward sustainable agriculture in Europe. In Edwards, C.A., Rattan, L., Wadden, P., Miller, R.H. and House, G. (eds.). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 265–286.Google Scholar
14.Ernst, E. W. 1989. Curriculum Development. Engineering Education 79 (01/02):20–24.Google Scholar
15.Fairnie, I. J., Stanton, J.H., and Dobbin, L.. 1989. A profile of tomorrow's agribusiness leaders: The Australian perspective. Agribusiness 5:259–263.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Faustman, C., Riesen, J., Suter, D., and Vietor, D.. 1996. New forms of higher education in agriculture. In Kunkel, H.O., Skaggs, C.L. and Maw, I.L. (eds.). Revolutionizing Higher Education in Agriculture. Framework for Change. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. p. 74–94.Google Scholar
17.Gliessman, S. R. 1998. Agroecology. Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture. Sleeping Bear Press, Chelsea, MI.Google Scholar
18.Jackson, W. 1985. New Roots for Agriculture. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
19.Keeney, D. R. 1989. Toward a sustainable agriculture: Need for clarification of concepts and terminology. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 4 (3–4): 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Kirchmann, H., and Thorvaldsson, G.. 2000. Challenging targets for future agriculture. European J. Agronomy 12:145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Kunkel, H. O., Maw, I.L., and Skaggs, C.L. (eds.). 1996. Revolutionizing Higher Education in Agriculture. Framework for Change. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
22.Leopold, A. 1999. For the health of the land: Previously unpublished essays and other writings. In Callicot, J. Baird and Freyfogle, E.T. (eds.). Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
23.Litzenberg, K. K., and Schneider, V.E.. 1987. Competencies and qualities of agricultural graduates sought by agribusiness employers. Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 69:1031–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Lockeretz, W. (ed.). 1997. Visions of American Agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
25.Nelson, A. G. 1996. Making change decisions: Deciding to change colleges of agriculture. In Kunkel, H.O., Skaggs, C.L. and Maw, I.L. (eds.). Revolutionizing Higher Education in Agriculture. Framework for Change. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. p. 102–112.Google Scholar
26.Newsome, R. 1991. How can undergraduate education be improved? Food Technology, (07):122–130.Google Scholar
27.Orr, W. D. 1992. Ecological Literacy. Education and Transition to a Postmodern World. State University of New York Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
28.Pilione, T. 1998. Holistic management decision-making: Producing a profit while considering human values and restoring the environment. In Borsari, B. and Vidrine, M.F. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture Seminar Proceedings. Vol. 1. Low Input Agriculture: Feasible Alternatives to Conventional Agricultural Practices. Louisiana State University at Eunice Press, Eunice, LA. p. 20–26.Google Scholar
29.Pratt, D. 1980. Curriculum Design and Development. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY.Google Scholar
30.Rodale, R. 1972. Small growers need more help from the agriculture colleges. Organic Gardening (09):30–37. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
31.Rodale, R. 1976. Small is necessary. Organic Gardening and Fanning (02):58–62. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
32.Russel, E. B. 1993. Attracting youth to agriculture. How colleges of agriculture can expand their role. J. Extension (Winter): 13–14.Google Scholar
33.Schumann, G. L. 1987. Plant pathology in general education. Plant Disease 71:857–860.Google Scholar
34.Silletto, T. A., Von Bargen, K., and Schinstock, J.L.. 1993. Revitalizing a curriculum. University of Nebraska-Lincoln identifies ‘outcomes’ needed from an education – to benefit students, potential employers. Agricultural Engineering 74:21–23.Google Scholar
35.Soule, D. J. and Piper, J.K.. 1992. Farming in Nature's Image. Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
36.Stauber, K. N. 1994. The future of agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agrie. 9:9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Townsend, C., and Kunkel, H.O.. 1996. Curricular design. In Kunkel, H.O., Skaggs, C.L. and Maw, I.L. (eds.). Revolutionizing Education in Agriculture. Framework for Change. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. p. 62–73.Google Scholar