Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Moving Beyond the Refugee Law Paradigm

  • Jaya Ramji-Nogales (a1)

Extract

Refugees dominate contemporary headlines. The migration “emergencies” at the southern U.S. border and the southern borders of the European Union, as well as the “crisis” in the Bay of Bengal, have drawn global attention to the dire inadequacies of the international refugee regime, even as extended through various principles of non-refoulement, in governing modern migration flows. Political responses to these mass movements, from the Brexit vote to the election of Donald Trump and his executive order halting the refugee resettlement process in the United States, have threatened the viability of refugee law's protections. At the policy level, numerous high-level stakeholders have convened in different constellations, through the United Nations and other bodies; many commentators agree that these meetings have accomplished little thus far in terms of law reform. The refugee law paradigm consumes so much space in the imagination of international lawyers and policymakers that it is hard even to begin to conceptualize an alternate approach to global migration law. The fear of losing even the narrow ground staked out to protect refugees stiffens the resistance to change. Proposals for reform tend to follow the tired old path of suggesting ways in which the refugee definition can be expanded to include new groups of migrants (ranging from climate change refugees to anyone fleeing serious human rights abuses) rather than critically evaluating the structure of global migration law more broadly.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Moving Beyond the Refugee Law Paradigm
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Moving Beyond the Refugee Law Paradigm
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Moving Beyond the Refugee Law Paradigm
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All

1 For further discussion of the “emergency” paradigm and the role of international law in constructing migration “emergencies,” see Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Migration Emergencies, 65 Hastings L. Rev. 101 (2017).

3 See, e.g., United Nations General Assembly, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 September 2016: New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, UN Doc. No A/RES/71/1 (Oct. 3, 2016) [hereinafter New York Declaration]; Organization of American States and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees High Level Round Table, San Jose Action Statement (July 7, 2016).

4 See, e.g., Bill Frelick, Theresa May's Refugee Vision is Narrow and Divisive, Newsweek (Sept. 20, 2016); Aurélie Ponthieu, Empty Promises? Radical Policy Shift Needed on Refugees and Migrants, Médécins sans Frontières Analysis (Sept. 22, 2016); ACTNOW, 7 actions world leaders urgently need to take to make a new deal for refugees, migrants and societies a reality (2016). But see Kathleen Newland, New Approaches to Refugee Crises in the 21st Century: The Role of the International Community, Migration Policy Institute Policy Brief 8–9 (Oct. 2016) (Newland's take is more optimistic, noting that the agreements have created frameworks for law reform in the form of two proposed “global compacts” even if they have not yet altered legal standards).

5 For a thoughtful assessment of this problem, see Moria Paz, Between the Kingdom and the Desert Sun: Human Rights, Immigration, and Border Walls, 34 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 1 (2016).

6 On this point, see Kate Ogg, The Future of Feminist Engagement with Refugee Law; From the Margins to the Centre and out of the ‘Pink Ghetto’?, forthcoming in Research Handbook on Women and International Law (Edward Elgar ed., 2017). Kate's article applies Martha Fineman's theory of the responsive state and Nedelsky's theory of relational autonomy to the concept of surrogate state protection in refugee law, critiquing “the development of two models of surrogate state protection polarized along gender lines [, namely independence/self-sufficiency and vulnerability/dependence/care responsibilities, as] inconsistent with feminist theories [which stress] that both men and women are dependent on the state or family for care and … both are constituted by relationships.”

7 See Beyond Survival: Setting Priorities in Livelihoods Research and Education for Refugees in the Middle East, Conference Proceedings Report 20–21 (2015), for a brief discussion of the history of the Refugee Convention, which I argue “conceptualized refugees as laborers, either in wage-earning employment, self-employment, or the liberal professions.” This was exemplified by the U.S. representative to the drafting conference for the Convention, who stated that “without the right to work all other rights were meaningless.”

8 This binary is reinforced by the New York Declaration, supra note 3, which lays the ground work for two separate agreements, a “comprehensive refugee response framework” and a “global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration.”

9 For a terrific discussion of the role that temporary regimes can play, see Jean Galbraith, Temporary International Legal Regimes as Frames for Permanent Ones, in 45 Neth. Y.B. Int'l L. 41 (2014).

10 See Paz, supra note 5.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AJIL Unbound
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2398-7723
  • URL: /core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed