Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-cxxrm Total loading time: 0.713 Render date: 2021-12-01T10:02:45.334Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }
  • English
American Political Science Review American Political Science Review

Article contents

Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2011

STEPHEN HABER  and
VICTOR MENALDO
STEPHEN HABER*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
VICTOR MENALDO*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
Stephen Haber is A.A. and Jeanne Welch Milligan Professor of Political Science and Peter and Helen Bing Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, 434 Galvez Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 (haber@stanford.edu).
Victor Menaldo is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Washington, 101 Gowen Hall, Seattle, WA 98105 (vmenaldo@u.washington.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large body of scholarship finds a negative relationship between natural resources and democracy. Extant cross-country regressions, however, assume random effects and are run on panel datasets with relatively short time dimensions. Because natural resource reliance is not an exogenous variable, this is not an effective strategy for uncovering causal relationships. Numerous sources of bias may be driving the results, the most serious of which is omitted variable bias induced by unobserved country-specific and time-invariant heterogeneity. To address these problems, we develop unique historical datasets, employ time-series centric techniques, and operationalize explicitly specified counterfactuals. We test to see if there is a long-run relationship between resource reliance and regime type within countries over time, both on a country-by-country basis and across several different panels. We find that increases in resource reliance are not associated with authoritarianism. In fact, in many specifications we generate results that suggest a resource blessing.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James, and Yared, Pierre. 2008. “Income and Democracy.” American Economic Review 98: 808–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslaksen, Silje. 2010. “Oil and Democracy: More than a Cross-country Correlation?” Journal of Peace Research 47 (4): 421–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bun, Maurice, and Wendmeijer, Frank. 2010. “The Weak Instrument Problem of the System GMM Estimator in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Econometrics Journal 13 (1): 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, David, Deaton, Angus, and Lleras-Muney, Adriana. 2006. “The Determinants of Mortality.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (3): 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul, and Wright, Gavin. 1997. “Increasing Returns and the Genesis of American Resource Abundance.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (2): 203–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBoef, Suzanna, and Keele, Luke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Robert, and Granger, Clive. 1987. “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing.” Econometrica 55 (2): 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Thomas. 2006. “The First Law of Petropolitics.” Foreign Policy 154: 28–36.Google Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark. 1995. “Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 89 (December): 882–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian, and Ward, Michael D.. 2006. “Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization.” International Organization 60 (4): 911–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Ellis, Wibbels, Eric, and Myukiyehe, Eric. 2008. “Lessons from Strange Cases: Democracy, Development, and the Resource Curse in the U.S. States.” Comparative Political Studies 41: 477–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Clive, and Newbold, Phillip. 1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 2: 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Stephen, Razo, Armando, and Maurer, Noel. 2003. The Politics of Property Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Kirk, and Clemens, Michael. 1999. “Genuine Savings Rates in Developing Countries.” World Bank Economic Review 13: 333–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herb, Michael. 2005. “No Representation without Taxation? Rents, Development, and Democracy.” Comparative Politics 37: 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted. 1995. “Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data.” Journal of Peace Research 32: 469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Nathan, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2004. “Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 37: 816–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanioura, Athina, and Turner, Paul. 2005. “Critical Values for an F-test for Cointegration in a Multivariate Model.” Applied Economics 37: 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard, and Winner, Hannes. 2005. “How Reliable Is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy?” European Journal of Political Research 44: 269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Andrew, Lin, Chien-Fu, and Chu, Chia-Shang James. 2002. “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties.” Journal of Econometrics 108: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciani, Giacomo. 1987. “Allocation versus Production States: A Theoretical Framework.” In The Rentier State, ed. Beblawi, Hazem and Luciani, Giacomo. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S., and Wu, Shaowen. 1999. “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Special Issue: 631–52.Google Scholar
Mahdavy, Hussein. 1970. “The Patterns and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran.” In Studies in the Economic History of the Middle East, ed. Cook, M. A.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manzano, Osmel, and Monaldi, Francisco. 2008. “The Political Economy of Oil Production in Latin America.” Economía 9 (1): 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, and Jaggers, Keith. 2008. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2006.” University of Maryland. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Norman, Catherine. 2009. “Rule of Law and the Resource Curse: Abundance versus Intensity.” Environmental and Resource Economics 43: 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaioannou, Elias, and Siourounis, Gregorios. 2008. “Economic and Social Factors Driving the Third Wave of Democratization.” Journal of Comparative Economics 36: 365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, Kristopher. N.d. “Revisiting the Resource Curse: Natural Disasters, the Price of Oil, and Democracy.” International Organization. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53: 325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2009. “Oil and Democracy Revisited.” University of California–Los Angeles. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Smith, Benjamin. 2007. Hard Times in the Land of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Soares, Rodrigo. 2007. “On the Determinants of Mortality Reductions in the Developing World.” Population and Development Review 33 (2): 247–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2002. “Why Do Resource Dependent Countries Have Authoritarian Governments?” Journal of African Finance and Economic Development 2: 57–77.Google Scholar
Westerlund, Joakim. 2007. “Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69 (6): 709–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey. 2006. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, OH: Thompson South-Western.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Haber and Menaldo supplementary materials

Appendices

Download Haber and Menaldo supplementary materials(PDF)
PDF 2 MB
429
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *