Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gbqfq Total loading time: 0.409 Render date: 2022-05-28T19:54:01.766Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
American Political Science Review American Political Science Review

Article contents

The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2004

JANET M. BOX-STEFFENSMEIER ,
SUZANNA DE BOEF  and
TSE-MIN LIN
JANET M. BOX-STEFFENSMEIER
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
SUZANNA DE BOEF
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
TSE-MIN LIN
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gender differences in vote choice, opinion, and party identification have become a common feature of the American political landscape. We examine the nature and causes of gender differences in partisanship using a time series approach. We show that gender differences are pervasive—existing outside of the context of specific elections or issues—and that they are a product of the interaction of societal conditions and politics. We find that from 1979 to 2000, the partisan gender gap has grown when the political climate moved in a conservative direction, the economy deteriorated, and the percentage of economically vulnerable, single women increased. The gender gap is likely to be a continual feature of the American political landscape: one that shapes everything from elite political behavior to election outcomes.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , August 2004 , pp. 515 - 528
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz Alan I., and Kyl L. Sanders. 1998 “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60 (August): 634– 52.Google Scholar
An S., and P. Bloomfield. 1993 “Cox and Reid's Modification in Regression Models with Correlated Errors.” Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
Andersen Kristi. 1999 “The Gender Gap and Experiences with the Welfare State,” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (March): 17– 19.Google Scholar
Bendyna Mary E., and Belinda C. Lake. 1994 “Gender and Voting in the 1992 Election.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Box George E. P., and Gwilym M. Jenkins. 1976 Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Rev. ed. San Francisco: Holden–Day.
Box-Steffensmeier Janet M., and Suzanna De Boef. 2001 “Macro-partisanship and Macroideology in the Sophisticated Electorate.” Journal of Politics 63 (1): 232– 48.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier Janet M., and Renée M. Smith. 1996 “The Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship.” American Political Science Review 90 (3): 567– 80.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier Janet M., and Renée M. Smith. 1998 “Investigating Political Dynamics Using Fractional Integration Methods.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 661– 89.Google Scholar
Carroll Susan. 1988. “Women's Autonomy and the Gender Gap: 1980 and 1982.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence, ed. Carol M. Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Carroll Susan. 1999 “The Disempowerment of the Gender Gap: Soccer Moms and the 1996 Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (March): 7– 11.Google Scholar
Chaney Carole, R. Michael Alvarez, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998 “Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (June): 311– 39.Google Scholar
Clark Cal, and Janet Clark. 1996. “The Gender Gap: A Manifestation of Women's Dissatisfaction with the American Polity?” In Broken Contract?: Changing Relationships between Americans and Their Government, ed. Stephen C. Craig. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Conover Pamela Johnston, and Virginia Sapiro. 1993 “Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (November): 1079– 99.Google Scholar
Cook Elizabeth Adell, and Clyde Wilcox. 1991 “Feminism and the Gender Gap: A Second Look.” Journal of Politics 53 (November): 1111– 22.Google Scholar
Cook Elizabeth Adell, and Clyde Wilcox. 1995. “Women Voters in the ‘Year of the Woman.” In Democracy's Feast: Elections in America, ed. Herbert F. Weisberg. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Deitch Cynthia. 1988 “Sex Differences in Support for Government Spending.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap, ed. Carol Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 192– 216.
Doornik Jurgen A., and Marius Ooms. 2003 “Computational Aspects of Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Autoregressive Fractionally Integrated Moving Average Models.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 42 (March): 333– 48.Google Scholar
1999 Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Review. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/consumptionbriefs/recs/heating_oil/chained_oil.html. Retrieved June 30, 2004.
Erie Steven P., and Martin Rein. 1988. “Women and the Welfare State.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence, ed. Carol M. Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Erikson Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson 2002 The Macro Polity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fair Ray C. 1978 “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President.” Review of Economics and Statistics 60 (May): 159– 73.Google Scholar
Fair Ray C. 1982 “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President: 1980 Results.” Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (May): 322– 25.Google Scholar
Freeman John R., John T. Williams, and Tse-min Lin. 1989 “Vector Autoregression and the Study of Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (November): 842– 77.Google Scholar
Friedrich Robert J. 1982 “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (November): 797– 833.Google Scholar
Granger C. W. J., and Roselyne Joyeux. 1980 “An Introduction to Long-Memory Time Series Models and Fractional Differencing.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 1 (1): 15– 29.Google Scholar
Haugh Larry D., and G. E. P. Box. 1977 “Identification of Dynamic Regression (Distributed Lag) Models Connecting Two Time Series.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 72 (March): 121– 30.Google Scholar
Hauser Michael A. 1999 “Maximum Likelihood Estimators for ARMA and ARFIMA Models: A Monte Carlo Study.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 80 (August): 229– 55.Google Scholar
Kanthak Kris, and Barbara Norrander. 2002 “Change and Continuity in the Gender Gap.” Typescript. University of Arizona.
Kaufmann Karen M., and John R. Petrocik. 1999 “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (July): 864– 87.Google Scholar
Kenski Henry C. 1988. “The Gender Factor in a Changing Electorate.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap, ed. Carol Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Klein Ethel. 1984 Gender Politics: From Consciousness to Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kramer Gerald H. 1971 “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65 (March): 131– 43.Google Scholar
Lebo Matthew J., special guest ed. 2000. “Special Issue: Advances in the Analysis of Political Time Series.” Electoral Studies 19 (1).Google Scholar
Lebo Matthew J., and Harold D. Clarke. 2000 “Modeling Memory and Volatility: Recent Advances in the Analysis of Political Time Series.” Electoral Studies 19 (1): 1– 7.Google Scholar
Lebo Matthew J., Robert W. Walker, and Harold D. Clarke. 2000 “You Must Remember This: Dealing with Long Memory in Political Analysis.” Electoral Studies 19 (1): 31– 48.Google Scholar
Maddala G. S., and In-Moo Kim. 1998 Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Manza Jeff and Clem Brooks. 1998 “The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (March): 1235– 66.Google Scholar
May Ann Mari, and Kurt Stephenson. 1994 “Women and the Great Retrenchment: The Political Economy of Gender in the 1980s.” Journal of Economic Issues 28 (June): 533– 42.Google Scholar
Miller Warren E. 1991 “Party Identification, Realignment, and Party Voting: Back to Basics.” American Political Science Review 85: 557– 68.Google Scholar
Mills Terrence D. 1992 Time Series Techniques for Economists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norrander Barbara. 1997 “The Independence Gap and the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61 (Fall): 464– 76.Google Scholar
Norrander Barbara. 1999 “Evolution of the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63 (Winter): 464– 76.Google Scholar
Parke William R. 1999 “What Is Fractional Integration?” Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (4): 632– 38.Google Scholar
Piven Frances F. 1985. “Women and the State: Ideology, Power, and the Welfare State.” In Gender and the Life Course, ed. Alice S. Rossi. New York: Aldine.
Rohde David W. 1991 Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ruddick Sara. 1980 “Maternal Thinking.” Feminist Studies 6: 342– 67.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2002 The Politics of Women's Place: Gender Roles, Public Opinion, and the American Party System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sapiro Virginia, and Conover. 1997 “The Variable Gender Basis of Electoral Politics—Gender and Content in the 1992 U.S. Election.” British Journal of Political Science 27 (October): 497– 523.Google Scholar
Schlozman Kay Lehman, Nancy Burns, Sidney Verba, and Jesse Donahue. 1995 “Gender and Citizen Participation: Is There a Different Voice?” American Journal of Political Science 39 (May): 267– 93.Google Scholar
Seelye Katharine Q. 2000 “Marital Status Is Shaping Women's Leanings, Surveys Find.” The New York Times, September 20, Sec. A, p. 1.Google Scholar
Seltzer Richard A., Jody Newman, and Melissa Voorhees Leighton. 1997 Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates & Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Sowell Fallaw. 1992 “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Stationary Univariate Fractionally Integrated Time Series Models.” Journal of Econometrics 53 (July): 165– 88.Google Scholar
Stark Steven. 1996 “Gap Politics.” The Atlantic Monthly July: 71– 80.Google Scholar
Stigler George J. 1973 “General Economic Conditions and National Elections.” American Economic Review 63 (May): 160– 67.Google Scholar
Stimson James A. 1998 Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Stimson James A., Michael B. MacKuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995 “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 543– 65.Google Scholar
van Belle Gerald. 2002 Statistical Rules of Thumb. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Welch Susan, and John Hibbing. 1992 “Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American National Elections.” Journal of Politics 54 (February): 197– 213.Google Scholar
Wirls Daniel. 1986 “Reinterpreting the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (Autumn): 316– 30.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht Christina. 2000 The Politics of Women's Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
167
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *