Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-q6bj7 Total loading time: 0.257 Render date: 2022-12-03T07:04:47.800Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Ethics and Incentives: A Political Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2006

RUTH W. GRANT
Affiliation:
Duke University

Abstract

Understood within an economic framework as a form of trade, incentives appear inherently ethical; understood as a form of power, incentives seem ethically suspect. Incentives, along with coercion and persuasion, are among the ways in which some people get others to do what they want them to do. This paper analyzes incentives as a form of power in order to develop criteria for distinguishing legitimate from illegitimate uses of them. Whereas an economic approach focuses on voluntariness as the sole criterion in judging incentives, this political approach yields three standards: purpose, voluntariness, and effect on the character of the parties involved. The paper explores issues that arise in applying these standards. Framing the problem of incentives as a problem of power reveals the ethical issues with greater depth and complexity than placing incentives in an economic frame of reference.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
© 2006 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1998. Politics. Trans. C. D. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Arrow K. J. 1972. “Gifts and Exchanges.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (Summer): 34362.Google Scholar
Berlin I. 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cicero. 1991. On Duties. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen G. A. 1983. “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom.“ Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (Winter): 333.Google Scholar
Connolly William E. 1983. The Terms of Political Discourse. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Driesen David. 1998. “Is Emissions Trading an Economic Incentive Program?: Replacing the Command and Control/Economic Incentive Dichotomy.” Washington and Lee Law Review 55 (Spring): 289350.Google Scholar
Elster J. ed. 1986a. “Introduction.” Rational Choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Elster J. 1986b. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” ed. J. Elster and A. Hylland. Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emanuel Ezekiel J., Xolani E. Currie, and Allen Herman. 2005. “Undue Inducement in Clinical Research in Developing Countries: Is It a Worry?Lancet 366: 36640.Google Scholar
Faden Ruth, Tom Beauchamp, and Nancy King. 1986. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frank Robert, Thomas Gilovich, and Dennis T. Regan. 1993. “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (Spring): 15772. New York: Vintage Books.
Grant R. 1997. Hypocrisy and Integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau and the Ethics of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grant R. 2002. “The Ethics of Incentives: Historical Origins and Contemporary Understandings.” Economics and Philosophy 18 (April): 11139.Google Scholar
Grant R., and R. Keohane. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99 (February): 2943.Google Scholar
Grant R., and J. Sugarman. 2004. “Ethics in Human Subjects Research: Do Incentives Matter?Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (December): 71738.Google Scholar
Habermas Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber; introduction Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hamilton A., J. Madison, and J. Jay. 1961. The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library.
Hardin Russell. 1993. “Blackmailing for Mutual Good.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141 (May): 1787816.Google Scholar
Hobbes T. 1968. Leviathan. ed. Macpherson C. B. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
Hollinger D. 2000. “Money and Academic Freedom a Half-Century after McCarthyism: Universities Amid the Force Fields of Capital.” ed. P. G. Hollingsworth. Unfettered Expression. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Homans George. 1967. The Nature of Social Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Kant I. 1981. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. trans. James Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Katz Leo. 1996. Ill-Gotten Gains: Evasion, Blackmail, Fraud, and Kindred Puzzles of the Law. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kelly C. 1987. “To persuade without Convincing”: The Language of Rousseau's Legislator.” American Journal of Political Science. 31 (May): 32135.Google Scholar
Kipnis Kenneth. 1976. “Criminal Justice and the Negotiated Plea.” Ethics 82 (January): 93106.Google Scholar
Kohn Alfie. 1993. Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kupperman J. 1991. Character. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lori Pegram, et al., Petitioners v. Cynthia Herdrich, 68 U.S. L. W. 4501 (June 12, 2000).
Machiavelli N. 1985. The Prince. trans. Harvey C. Mansfield, Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mandeville B. 1989. The Fable of the Bees. London: Penguin Books.
Mansfield C., G. Van Houtven, and J. Huber. 2000. “Compensating for Public Harms: Why Public Goods Are Preferred to Money.” Land Economics 78 (August): 36889.Google Scholar
Neustadt R. 1976. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership with Reflections on Johnson and Nixon. New York: Wiley.
Niou, Emerson M. S., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1985. “Universalism in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science. 29 (May): 24658.Google Scholar
Nozick Robert. 1972. “Coercion.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, ed. P. Laslett, W. G. Runciman, and Q. Skinner. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nye Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs Press.
Pearson S., J. Sabin, and E. Emmanuel. 1998. “Ethical Guidelines for Physician Compensation Based on Capitation.” New England Journal of Medicine 339 (September 3): 68993.Google Scholar
Plato. 1960. Gorgias. trans. Walter Hamilton. London: Penguin Books.
Posner, Richard A. 1996. “The Immoralist. Book Review of Leo Katz. 1996.” Ill-Gotten Gains: Evasion, Blackmail, Fraud, and Kindred Puzzles of the Law. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. The New Republic, 215 (July 15): 34, 38.
Reeve Andrew. 1987. Modern Theories of Exploitation. London: Sage.
Roemer John. 1986. “Should Marxists Be Interested in Exploitation? In Analytical Marxism, ed. John Roemer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau J. J. 1997a. “Of the Social Contract.” ed. Victor Gourevitch. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau J. J. 1997b. “Letter from J. J. Rousseau to M. de Voltaire, 18 August 1756.” The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz B. 1986. The Battle for Human Nature: Science, Morality and Modern Life. New York: Norton.
Shaftesbury A. 1999. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions and Times. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Smelser N. 1992. “The Rational Choice Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment.” Rationality and Society 4 (October): 380410.Google Scholar
Smith A. 1976. The Wealth of Nations, ed. Edwin Cannan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sophocles. 1957. “Philoctetes.” ed. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Sophocles II Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Staddon J. 2001. The New Behaviorism: Mind, Mechanism and Society. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Steiner H. 1975. “Individual Liberty.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 75: 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler G., and G. Becker. 1977. De Gustibus non Disputandum, “The American Economic Review 67 (March): 7690.Google Scholar
Surjadinata Kenneth. 1998. Revisiting corrupt practices from a market perspective. Emory International Law Review 12 (Spring): 1021890.Google Scholar
Taylor Michael. 1996. Good government: On hierarchy, social capital, and the limitations of rational choice theory. The Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (March): 128.Google Scholar
Taylor Robert. 2004. A Kantian defense of self-ownership. The Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (March): 6578.Google Scholar
Titmuss R. 1997. The Gift Relationship New York: The New Press.
United States National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Walzer M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
Weingast Barry. 1979. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (May): 24562.Google Scholar
Werthiemer Alan. 1979. The Prosecutor and the gunman. Ethics 89 (April): 26979.Google Scholar
Wertheimer Alan. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ethics and Incentives: A Political Approach
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Ethics and Incentives: A Political Approach
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Ethics and Incentives: A Political Approach
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *