Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-t4qhp Total loading time: 0.356 Render date: 2022-08-13T07:02:52.087Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2014

DANIEL CARPENTER*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
COLIN D. MOORE*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
*
Daniel Carpenter is Allie S. Freed Professor of Government; Director, Center for American Political Studies; Director of Social Sciences, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study Harvard University (dcarpenter@gov.harvard.edu)
Colin D. Moore is Assistant Professor of Political Science University of Hawaii (cdmoore@hawaii.edu)

Abstract

Examining an original dataset of more than 8,500 antislavery petitions sent to Congress (1833–1845), we argue that American women's petition canvassing conferred skills and contacts that empowered their later activism. We find that women canvassers gathered 50% or more signatures (absolute and per capita) than men while circulating the same petition requests in the same locales. Supplementary evidence (mainly qualitative) points to women's persuasive capacity and network building as the most plausible mechanisms for this increased efficacy. We then present evidence that leaders in the women's rights and reform campaigns of the nineteenth century were previously active in antislavery canvassing. Pivotal signers of the Seneca Falls Declaration were antislavery petition canvassers, and in an independent sample of post–Civil War activists, women were four times more likely than men to have served as identifiable antislavery canvassers. For American women, petition canvassing—with its patterns of persuasion and networking—shaped legacies in political argument, network formation, and organizing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, Raymond C. 1979. Popular Influence upon Public Policy: Petitioning in Eighteenth-Century Virginia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Berg, Barbara. 1978. The Remembered Gate: The Woman and the City, 1800–1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bingham, Richard D., Frendreis, John P., and Rhodes, James M.. 1978. “The Nominating Process in Nonpartisan Elections: Petition Signing as an Act of Support.” Journal of Politics 40 (4): 1044–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Robert, Mouton, Jane Srygly, and Hain, J. D.. 1956. “Social Forces in Petition-Signing.” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 37 (March): 384–90.Google Scholar
Bowling, Kenneth R., and Kennon, Donald R., eds. 2002. The House and Senate in the 1790s: Petitioning, Lobbying, and Institutional Development. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Boylan, Anne M. 2002. The Origins of Women's Activism: New York and Boston, 1797–1840. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry, Schlozman, Kay L., and Verba, Sidney. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” American Political Science Review 93: 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Scholzman, Kay L., and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Inequality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 2012. The Roots of Radicalism: Tradition, the Public Sphere, and Early-Nineteenth-Century Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea M. 2002. “Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation Patterns of Senior Citizens.” American Political Science Review 96 (September): 565–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea M. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caren, Neal, Ghoshal, Raj Andrew, and Ribas, Vanessa. 2011. “A Social Movement Generation: Cohort and Period Trends in Protest Attendance and Petition Signing.” American Sociological Review 76 (1): 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chace, Elizabeth Buffum. 1891. Anti-Slavery Reminiscences. Central Falls, RI: E. L. Freeman & Son.Google Scholar
Chapman, Maria Weston. 1839. Right and Wrong in Massachusetts. Boston : Dow 7 Jackson’s Anti-Slavery Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth. 1997. The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 1997. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman's Sphere” in New England, 1780–1830. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dumond, Dwight. 1961. Antislavery: The Crusade for Freedom in America. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
DuBois, Ellen Carol. 1978. Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America, 1848–1869. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Flexner, Eleanor, and Fitzpatrick, Ellen. 1996. Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grimké, Angelina. 1837. An Appeal to the Women of the Nominally Free States. New York: William S. Door.Google Scholar
Grimké, Sarah. 1838. Letters on the Equality of the Sexes and the Condition of Woman, Addressed to Mary Parker, President of the Boston Female Anti-Slavery Society. Boston: Isaac Knapp.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry, Blake, Robert, and Mouton, Jane Srygly. 1958. “Petition Signing as Adjustment to Personal and Situational Factors.” Journal of Social Psychology 48 (August): 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Nancy. 1984. Women's Activism and Social Change: Rochester, New York, 1822–1872. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Julie Roy. 1998. The Great Silent Army of Abolitionism: Ordinary Women in the Antislavery Movement. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Katosh, J. P., and Traugott, Michael W.. 1981. “The Consequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerber, Linda. 1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Knudsen, Brian B., and Clark, Terry L.. 2013. “Walk and Be Moved: How Walking Builds Social Movements,” Urban Affairs Review, June 2, doi: 10.1177/1078087413490395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Taeku. 2002. Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gilda. 1980. The Majority Finds Its Past. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magdol, Edward. 1986. The Antislavery Rank and File: A Social Profile of the Abolitionists’ Constituency. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Margetts, Helen, John, Peter, Escher, Tobias, and Reissfelder, Stéphane. 2014. “Social Information and Political Participation on the Internet: An Experiment.” European Political Science Review, doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000129, April 24.Google Scholar
Marilley, Suzanne. 1996. Woman Suffrage and the Origins of Liberal Feminism, 1820–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Ebers, Valerie, and Dorraj, Manochehr. 2009. Perspectives on Race, Ethnicity and Religion: Identity Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Douglas. 1990. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, James M. 1967. The Struggle for Equality: Abolitionists and the Negro in the Civil War and Reconstruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, James M. 1975. The Abolitionist Legacy: From Reconstruction to the NAACP. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, James M. 1988. Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2007. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of America's Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, William Lee. 1995. Arguing about Slavery: John Quincy Adams and the Great Battle in the United States Congress. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Morone, James A. 2004. Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2002. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (2): 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neem, Johann. 2008. Creating a Nation of Joiners: Democracy and Civil Society in Early National Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Anne. 2004. 95 Theses on Politics, Culture and Method. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Christopher S. 2009a. “When Politics Becomes Protest: Black Veterans and Political Activism in the Postwar SouthJournal of Politics 71 (1): 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Christopher S. 2009b. Fighting for Democracy: Black Veterans and the Struggle against White Supremacy in the Postwar South. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portnoy, Alisse. 2002. “‘A Right to Speak on the Subject’: The U.S. Women's Antiremoval Petition Campaign, 1829–31.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 5 (4): 601–24.Google Scholar
Portnoy, Alisse. 2003. “‘Female Petitioners Can Lawfully Be Heard’: Negotiating Female Decorum, U.S. Politics, and Political Agency, 1829–31.” Journal of the Early Republic 23 (2003): 573610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portnoy, Alisse. 2005. Their Right to Speak: Women's Activism in the Indian and Slave Debates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Leonard L. 1970. “Gentleman of Property and Standing”: Anti-Abolition Mobs in Jacksonian America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, Michael. 2013. “Why the White House Loves Your Death Star Petition.” TIME, January 31.Google Scholar
Sklar, Kathryn Kish. 2000. Women's Rights Emerges within the Antislavery Movement, 1830–1870. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2004. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2002. “Ballot Initiatives and the Democratic Citizen.” Journal of Politics 64: 892903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, James Brewer. 1997. Holy Warriors: The Abolitionists and American Slavery. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, Peter, Bochner, Stephen, and Matas, Carol. 1971. “Petitioner's Attire and Petition Signing by Peace Demonstrators: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1 (3): 278–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, Anne-Marie E. 2003. Pathways to Prohibition: Radicals, Moderates and Social Movement Outcomes. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Groenendyk, Eric W.. 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions, and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior 31 (3): 307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Broekhoven, Deborah Bingham. 1994. “‘Let Your Names Be Enrolled’: Method and Ideology in Women's Antislavery Petitioning.” In The Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women's Political Culture in Antebellum America, eds. Yellin, Jean Fagan and Horne, John Van. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 179200.Google Scholar
Van Broekhoven, Deborah Bingham. 2002. The Devotion of These Women: Rhode Island in the Antislavery Network. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2006. “Applying Norton's Challenge to the Study of Political Behavior: Focus on Process, the Particular and the Ordinary.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2): 353–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2007. Talking about Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2012. “Putting Inequality in Its Place: Rural Consciousness and the Power of Perspective.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 517–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Judith. 1991. “The Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention: A Study in Social Networks.” Women's History 3 (1): 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Judith. 2004. The Road to Seneca Falls: Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the First Women's Rights Convention. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Allen R., and Weinberg, Leonard B.. 1977. “Petition Signing in the 1968 Election.” Western Political Quarterly 24 (4): 731–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yellin, Jean Fagan, and Van Horne, John C., eds. 1994. The Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women's Political Culture in Antebellum America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zaeske, Susan. 2003. Signatures of Citizenship. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 2002. “The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 21: 297329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaret, David. 2000. Origins of Democratic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2008. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Carpenter supplementary material

Carpenter supplementary material

Download Carpenter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 614 KB
39
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *