Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T04:33:36.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Who Gets Hired? Political Patronage and Bureaucratic Favoritism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2024

MAI HASSAN*
Affiliation:
MIT, United States
HORACIO LARREGUY*
Affiliation:
ITAM, Mexico
STUART RUSSELL*
Affiliation:
World Bank, United States
*
Corresponding author: Mai Hassan, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, MIT, United States, mhass@mit.edu.
Horacio Larreguy, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, ITAM, Mexico, horacio.larreguy@itam.mx.
Stuart Russell, Economist, The World Bank, srussell2@worldbank.org.

Abstract

Most research on biased public sector hiring highlights local politicians’ incentives to distribute government positions to partisan supporters. Other studies instead point to the role of bureaucratic managers in allocating government jobs to close contacts. We jointly consider the relative importance of each source of biased hiring as an allocation problem between managers and politicians who have different preferences regarding public sector hiring and different abilities to realize those preferences. We develop a theoretical model of each actor’s relative leverage and relative preferences for different types of public sector positions. We empirically examine our theory using the universe of payroll data in Kenyan local governments from 2004 to 2013. We find evidence of both patronage and bureaucratic favoritism, but with different types of bias concentrated in different types of government jobs, as our theory predicts. Our results highlight the inadequacy of examining political patronage alone without incorporating the preferences and leverage of the bureaucratic managers who are intricately involved in hiring processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashraf, Nava, and Bandiera, Oriana. 2018. “Social Incentives in Organizations.” Annual Review of Economics 10: 439–63.Google Scholar
Bowles, Jeremy, Larreguy, Horacio, and Liu, Shelley. 2020. “How Weakly Institutionalized Parties Monitor Brokers in Developing Democracies: Evidence from Post-Conflict Liberia.” American Journal of Political Science 64 (4): 952–67.Google Scholar
Brassiolo, Paglo, Estrada, Ricardo, Fajardo, Gustavo, and Martinez-Correa, Julian. 2021. “Family Rules: Nepotism in the Mexican Judiciary System.” CAF Working Paper. http://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1798.Google Scholar
Brierley, Sarah. 2020. “Unprincipled Principals: Co-opted Bureaucrats and Corruption in Ghana.” American Journal of Political Science 64 (2): 209–22.Google Scholar
Brierley, Sarah. 2021. “Combining Patronage and Merit in Public Sector Recruitment.” Journal of Politics 83 (1): 182–97.Google Scholar
Brierley, Sarah, Lowande, Kenneth, Potter, Rachel Augustine, and Toral, Guillermo. 2023. “Bureaucratic Politics: Blindspots and Opportunities in Political Science.”Annual Review of Political Science 26: 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Robin, Jedwab, Remi, Miguel, Edward, and Morjaria, Ameet. 2015. “The Value of Democracy: Evidence from Road Building in Kenya.” American Economic Review 105 (6): 1817–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonnelli, Emanuele, Prem, Mounu, and Teso, Edorado. 2020. “Patronage and Selection in Public Sector Organizations.” American Economic Review 110 (10): 3071–99.Google Scholar
Cornell, Agnes, and Grimes, Marcia. 2022. “Brokering Bureaucrats: How Bureaucrats and Civil Society Facilitate Clientelism Where Parties are Weak.” Comparative Political Studies 56 (6): 788823.Google Scholar
Cruz, Cesi, and Keefer, Philip. 2015. “Political Parties, Clientelism, and Bureaucratic Reform.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (14): 1942–73.Google Scholar
Driscoll, Barry. 2018. “Why Political Competition Can Increase Patronage.” Studies in Comparative International Development 53: 404–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elischer, Sebastian. 2013. Political Parties in Africa: Ethnicity and Party Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finan, Frederico, Olken, Benjamin, and Pande, Rohini. 2017. “The Personnel Economics of the Developing State.” Handbook of Economic Field Experiments 2: 467514.Google Scholar
Folke, Olle, Hirano, Shigeo, and Snyder, James M.. 2011. “Patronage and Elections in US States.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 567–85.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodman-Bacon, Andrew. 2021. “Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing.” Journal of Econometrics 225 (2): 254–77.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 2012. Jobs for the Boys: Patronage and the State in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Groenwold, Rolf, White, Ian, Donders, Rogier, Carpenter, James, Altman, Douglas, and Moons, Karel. 2012. “Missing Covariate Data in Clinical Research: When and When not to Use the Missing-Indicator Method for Analysis.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 184 (11): 1265–9.Google Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gulzar, Saad, and Pasquale, Benjamin J.. 2017. “Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Development: Evidence from India.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 162–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. Andrew, and Posner, Daniel N.. 2019. “(Under What Conditions) Do Politicians Reward Their Supporters? Evidence from Kenya’s Constituencies Development Fund.” American Political Science Review 113 (1): 123–39.Google Scholar
Hassan, Mai. 2020. Regime Threats and State Solutions: Bureaucratic Loyalty and Embeddedness in Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hassan, Mai, and Sheely, Ryan. 2017. “Executive-Legislative Relations, Party Defections, and Lower-Level Administrative Unit Proliferation: Evidence from Kenya.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (12): 1595–631.Google Scholar
Hassan, Mai, Larreguy, Horacio, and Russell, Stuart. 2024. “Replication Data for: Who Gets Hired? Political Patronage and Bureaucratic Favoritism.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MLZ39X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjort, Jonas. 2014. “Ethnic Divisions and Production in Firms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (4): 1899–946.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Jeremy. 2019. “Ethnicity and the Swing Vote in Africa’s Emerging Democracies: Evidence from Kenya.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 901–21.Google Scholar
Huber, John, and Ting, Michael. 2021. “Civil Service and Patronage in Bureaucracies.” Journal of Politics 83 (3): 902–16.Google Scholar
Johnson-Kanu, Ada. 2021. “Colonial Legacies in State Building: Ethnicity and Bureaucratic Representation in Nigeria.” PhD diss. University of California, Merced.Google Scholar
Kingsley, John Donald. 1944. Representative Bureaucracy. Brentwood, CA: Antioch Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kramon, Eric, and Posner, Daniel N.. 2016. “Ethnic Favoritism in Primary Education in Kenya.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11 (1): 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krislov, Samuel. 2012. Representative Bureaucracy. New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro Books.Google Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Montiel, Cesar, and Querubin, Pablo. 2017. “Political Brokers: Partisans or Agents? Evidence from the Mexican Teacher’s Union.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (24): 877–91.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela, and Young, Lauren. 2019. Conditionality and Coercion: Electoral Clientelism in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lucy, and Raffler, Pia. 2021. “Fault Lines: The Effects of Bureaucratic Power on Electoral Accountability.” American Journal of Political Science 65 (1): 210–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mboga, Hamisi. 2009. Understanding the Local Government System in Kenya: A Citizen’s Handbook. Nairobi, Kenya: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Menon, Balakrishna, Mutero, James, and Macharia, Simon. 2008. “Decentralization and Local Governments in Kenya.” International Studies Program Working Paper.Google Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, Schuster, Christian, and Mikkelsen, Kim Sass. 2018. “Civil Service Management in Developing Countries: What Works? Evidence from a Survey with 23,000 Civil Servants in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America.” UK Department for International Development Report.Google Scholar
Muia, Daniel. 2008. Devolution: Which Way for Local Authorities? Nairobi, Kenya: University of Nairobi Press.Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Odhiambo, Morris, Mitullah, Winnie, and Akivaga, Kichamu. 2005. Management of Resources by Local Authorities: The Case of Local Authority Transfer Fund in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Claripress.Google Scholar
Oliveros, Virginia. 2021. Patronage at Work: Public Jobs and Political Services in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owolabi, Sade. 2011. “Shifted Responsibilities: Case Studies of Kenya’s Participatory Local Authority Service Delivery Action Plan (LASDAP).” PhD diss. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, Bruno, and Zingales, Luigi. 2017. “Diagnosing the Italian Disease.” NBER Working Paper 23964. https://www.nber.org/papers/w23964.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas, Pierskalla, Jan, and Sacks, Audrey. 2017. “Bureaucracy and Service Delivery.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 249–68.Google Scholar
Pierskalla, Jan, and Sacks, Audrey. 2020. “Personnel Politics: Elections, Clientelistic Competition and Teacher Hiring in Indonesia.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 1283–305.Google Scholar
Rasul, Imran, and Rogger, Daniel. 2018. “Management of Bureaucrats and Public Service Delivery: Evidence from the Nigerian Civil Service.” The Economic Journal 128 (608): 413–46.Google Scholar
Rasul, Imran, Rogger, Daniel, and Williams, Martin. 2021. “Management, Organizational Performance, and Task Clarity: Evidence from Ghana’s Civil Service.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (2): 259–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riano, Juan Felipe. 2022. “Bureaucratic Nepotism.” Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James, and Verdier, Thierry. 2013. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115 (2): 260–91.Google Scholar
Rogger, Daniel. 2017. “Who Serves the Poor? Surveying Civil Servants in the Developing World.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8051.Google Scholar
Rogger, Daniel. 2018. “The Consequences of Political Interference in Bureaucratic Decision-Making: Evidence from Nigeria.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8554.Google Scholar
Salgado, Marcos. 2021. “Building Loyalty through Personal Connections: Evidence from the Spanish Empire.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Schuster, Christian. 2016. “What Causes Patronage Reform? It Depends on the Type of Civil Service Reform.” Public Administration 94 (4): 1094–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheely, Ryan. 2015. “Mobilization, Participatory Planning Institutions, and Elite Capture: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Kenya.” World Development 67: 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigman, Rachel. 2022. “Which Jobs for Which Boys? Party Finance and the Politics of State Job Distribution in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 55 (3): 351–85.Google Scholar
Toral, Guillermo. 2023. “How Patronage Delivers: Political Appointments, Bureaucratic Accountability, and Service Delivery in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12758.Google Scholar
Toral, Guillermo. Forthcoming. “Turnover: How Lame-Duck Governments Disrupt the Bureaucracy and Service Delivery before Leaving Office.” Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Xu, Guo. 2018. “The Costs of Patronage: Evidence from the British Empire.” American Economic Review 108 (11): 3170–98.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hassan et al. supplementary material

Hassan et al. supplementary material
Download Hassan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.9 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Hassan et al. Dataset

Link
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.