Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:41:38.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

America's Departments of State: Irregular and Regular Syndromes of Policy Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bert A. Rockman
Bert A. Rockman*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article (1) sketches a general explanation for the growth of coordinative machinery and of irregular personnel in modern governments; (2) identifies both general and specific reasons for this phenomenon in the United States with special reference to foreign policy making; (3) identifies within the American foreign policy-making context the modal characteristics of irregular and regular syndromes of policy making, and the conjunction between personnel and institutional base; (4) traces the implications arising from these different policy syndromes; and (5) evaluates some proposals for improving the coherence and knowledge base of American foreign policy making. The problems of defining foreign policy authority, assuring an integrated perspective, and effectively using specialized expertise are best seen in terms of the larger problem of governance in Washington against which all proposals for reform must be abraded.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 911 - 927
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D., and Rockman, Bert A. (1981). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aberbach, Joel D. and Rockman, Bert A. (1976). “Clashing Beliefs within the Executive Branch: The Nixon Administration Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 70: 456–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham (1980). “An Executive Cabinet.” Society: 17, July/August, 41–47.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, and Szanton, Peter (1976). Remaking Foreign Policy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Scott (1980). “Carter Given Oaths on ‘Leaks.’” The Washington Post. 16 July 1980, pp. A1, A4.Google Scholar
Art, Robert J. (1973). “Bureaucratic Politics and American Foreign Policy: A Critique.” Policy Sciences 4: 467–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J. (1980). “The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey?” Political Science Quarterly 95: 97–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, F. Clifton Jr., and Kyle, Deborah (1977). “The ‘Other Cabinet’: The National Security Council Staff.” Armed Forces Journal 114 (July): 12–20.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin (1980). “The President's Advisory System under Carter: From Spokes in a Wheel to Wagons in a Circle.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin, and Szablowski, George J. (1979). The Super-bureaucrats: Structure and Behaviour in Central Agencies. Toronto: Macmillan of Canada.Google Scholar
Campbell, John Franklin (1971). The Foreign Affairs Fudge Factory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Covington, Cary R. (1981). “Presidential Memory Development in Three Presidential Agencies.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E. (1975). The State of the Presidency. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Crossman, R. H. S. (1972). The Myths of Cabinet Government. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Destler, I. M. (1980). “A Job That Doesn't Work.” Foreign Policy 38: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destler, I. M. (1977). “National Security Advice to U.S. Presidents: Some Lessons From Thirty Years.” World Politics 29: 143–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destler, I. M.. (1972a). “Making Foreign Policy: Comment.” American Political Science Review 66: 786–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destler, I. M. (1972b). Presidents. Bureaucrats, and Foreign Policy: The Politics of Organizational Reform. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, K. H. F. (1974). “Planning and the Federal Chancellor's Office in the West German Federal Government.” Political Studies 21: 348–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Rowland, and Novak, Robert (1981). “The Education of Al Haig.” Washington Post. 1 May 1981, p. A19.Google Scholar
Falk, Stanley L. (1964). “The National Security Council under Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy.” Political Science Quarterly 79: 403–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr., (1975). “The President's Cabinet.” In Wildavsky, Aaron (ed.), Perspectives on the Presidency. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Gelb, Leslie H. (1980). “Muskie and Brzezinski: The Struggle over Foreign Policy.” New York Times Magazine, 20 July 1980, pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. (1972a). “The Case for Multiple Advocacy in Making Foreign Policy.” American Political Science Review 66: 751–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. (1972b). “Making Foreign Policy: Rejoinder.” American Political Science Review 66: 791–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, Donald L. (1977). “Bureaucratic Politics and ‘Those Frigging Missiles’: JFK, Cuba and U.S. Missiles in Turkey.” Orbis 21: 307–32.Google Scholar
Hammond, Paul Y. (1960). “The National Security Council as a Device for Interdepartmental Coordination: An Interpretation and Appraisal.” American Political Science Review 54: 899–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh (1975). “OMB and the Presidency: The Problem of ‘Neutral Competence.’” The Public Interest 38 (Winter): 80–98.Google Scholar
Klein, Rudolf, and Lewis, Janet (1977). “Advice and Dissent in British Government: The Case of the Special Advisers.” Policy and Politics 6: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maechling, Charles Jr., (1976). “Foreign Policy-Makers: The Weakest Link?” Virginia Quarterly Review 52: 1–23.Google Scholar
McGregor, Eugene B. Jr., (1974). “Politics and the Career Mobility of Bureaucrats.” American Political Science Review 68: 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennis, Bernard (1971). American Foreign Policy Officials: Who They Are and What They Believe Regarding International Politics. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1968). “Role of the Intellectual in Public Bureaucracy.” In Merton, R. K., Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Thomas P., Nuechterlein, Donald E., and Stupak, Ronald J. (1978). Inside the Bureaucracy: The View from the Assistant Secretary's Desk. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Nathan, Richard P. (1975). The Plot that Failed: Nixon and the Administrative Presidency. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
National Security Policy Integration (1979). Report of a Study Requested by the President under the Auspices of the President's Reorganization Project. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. (1954). “Presidency and Legislation: The Growth of Central Clearance.” American Political Science Review 48: 641–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. (1980). Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership from FDR to Carter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1976a). Managing Presidential Objectives. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard (1976b). “On the Priorities of Government: A Developmental Analysis of Public Policies.” European Journal of Political Research 4: 247–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard. (1980). “Government against Sub-governments: A European Perspective on Washington.” In Rose, Richard and Suleiman, Ezra (eds.), Presidents and Prime Ministers: Giving Direction to Government. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Sapin, Burton M. (1967). The Making of United States Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sayre, Wallace S. (1964). “Bureaucracies: Some Contrasts in Systems.” Indian Journal of Public Administration 10: 219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidman, Harold (1980). Politics. Position, and Power: The Dynamics of Federal Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silberman, Laurence H. (1979). “Toward Presidential Control of the State Department.” Foreign Affairs 57: 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Hedrick (1981). “A Scaled-down Version of Security Adviser's Task.” New York Times, 4 March 1981, p. A2.Google Scholar
Stanley, David T., Mann, Dean E., and Doig, Jameson W. (1967). Men Who Govern: A Biographical Profile of American Federal Executives. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar