Skip to main content

Anonymity and Democracy: Absence as Presence in the Public Sphere


Although anonymity is a central feature of liberal democracies—not only in the secret ballot, but also in campaign funding, publishing political texts, masked protests, and graffiti—it has so far not been conceptually grounded in democratic theory. Rather, it is treated as a self-explanatory concept related to privacy. To overcome this omission, this article develops a complex understanding of anonymity in the context of democratic theory. Drawing upon the diverse literature on anonymity in political participation, it explains anonymity as a highly context-dependent identity performance expressing private sentiments in the public sphere. The contradictory character of its core elements—identity negation and identity creation—results in three sets of contradictory freedoms. Anonymity affords (a) inclusion and exclusion, (b) subversion and submission, and (c) honesty and deception. This contradictory character of anonymity's affordances illustrates the ambiguous role of anonymity in democracy.

Corresponding author
Hans Asenbaum is a PhD Candidate and Visiting Lecturer at the Centre for the Study of Democracy, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2HW, United Kingdom (
Hide All

I am indebted to Graham Smith for relentless support, advice, and inspiring conversations. For helpful feedback, I would like to thank Matthew Fluck. I am also very grateful to John Dryzek, Selen Ercan, Nicole Curato, Simon Niemeyer, Lucy Parry, and everyone who participated in the seminar at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance, University of Canberra, and to Dorotheé de Nève and her team at the University of Giessen. Moreover, this article has benefitted from inspiring comments of three anonymous reviewers, which I am very grateful for.

Hide All
Akdeniz, Yaman. 2002. “Anonymity, Democracy, and Cyberspace.” Social Research 69 (2): 223–37.
Alcoff, Linda. 1991. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Cultural Critique 20 (20): 532.
Asenbaum, Hans. 2018. “Cyborg Activism: Exploring the Reconfigurations of Democratic Subjectivity in Anonymous.” New Media & Society 20 (4): 1543–63.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1996. Rabelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Barendt, Eric. 2016. Anonymous Speech: Literature, Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Bartlett, Jamie. 2015. The Dark Net. London: Windmill Books.
Bastos, Marco, and Mercea, Dan. 2017. “The Brexit Botnet and User-Generated Hyperpartisan News.” Social Science Computer Review, 118.
Baxter, Hillary. 2015. “Masquerade, Pride, Drag, Love and Marriage.” In Masquerade: Essays on Tradition and Innovation Worldwide, ed. Bell, Deborah. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, 103–12.
Berlin, Isaiah. (1958) 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–72.
Bessi, Alessandro, and Ferrara, Emilio. 2016. “Social Bots Distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Online Discussion.” First Monday 21: 114.
Beyer, Jessica. 2014. “The Emergence of a Freedom of Information Movement: Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Pirate Party, and Iceland.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (19): 141–54.
Blau, Adrian. 2004. “Against Positive and Negative Freedom.” Political Theory 32 (4): 547–53.
Blee, Kathleen, and McDowell, Amy. 2013. “The Duality of Spectacle and Secrecy: A Case Study of Fraternalism in the 1920s US Ku Klux Klan.” 36 (2): 249–65.
Bruce, Caitlin. 2015. “The Balaclava as Affect Generator: Free Pussy Riot Protests and Transnational Iconicity.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 12 (1): 4262.
Bruner, Lane. 2005. “Carnivalesque Protest and the Humorless State.” Text and Performance Quarterly 25 (5): 136–55.
Buchstein, Hubertus. 1997. “Bytes That Bite: The Internet and Deliberative Democracy.” Constellations 4 (2): 248–63.
Butler, Ella. 2006. “The Anthropology of Anonymity: Toilet Graffiti at the University of Melbourne.” 30. Research Paper Series of the University of Melbourne. School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies. Melbourne.
Cambre, Maria-Carolina. 2014. “Becoming Anonymous: A Politics of Masking.” In Educational, Psychological, and Behavioral Considerations in Niche Online Communities, eds. Venkatesh, Vivek, Wallin, Jason, Castro, Juan Carlos, and Lewis, Jason Edward. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 297321.
Cardell, Kylie, and Maguire, Emma. 2015. “Hoax Politics: Blogging, Betrayal, and the Intimate Public of A Gay Girl in Damascus.” Biography 38 (2): 205–21.
Cohen, Jean. 1992. “Redescribing Privacy: Identity, Difference, and the Abortion Controversy.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 3 (3): 43117.
Coleman, Gabriella. 2014. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. London: Verso.
da Vinci, Leonardo. 2005. The Da Vinci Notebooks. London: Profile Books.
Diaz, Claudia, Seys, Stefaan, Claessens, Joris, and Preneel, Bart. 2003. “Towards Measuring Anonymity.” In Privacy Enhancing Technologies, eds. Dingledine, Roger and Syverson, Paul. Berlin: Springer, 5468.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2009. “In Praise of Exclusion.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1172–86.
Ferry, Anne. 2002. “‘Anonymity’: The Literary History of a Word.” New Literary History 33 (2): 193214.
Freire, Paulo. (1970) 2005. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26: 5680.
Fromm, Erich. 1941. Escape from Freedom. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Gardner, James. 2011. “Anonymity and Democratic Citizenship.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 19 (4):927–57.
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Griffin, Robert. 1999. “Anonymity and Authorship.” New Literary History 30 (4): 877–95.
Groeneveld, Elizabeth. 2015. “Are We All Pussy Riot? On Narratives of Feminist Return and the Limits of Transnational Solidarity.” Feminist Theory 16 (3): 289307.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. 1st paperb. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Halpin, Harry. 2012. “The Philosophy of Anonymous: Ontological Politics without Identity.” Radical Philosophy (176): 19–28.
Hunter, Christopher. 2002. “Political Privacy and Online Politics: How E-Campaigning Threatens Voter Privacy.” First Monday 7 (2).
Jonker, Hugo, and Pieters, Wolter. 2010. “Anonymity in Voting Revisited.” In Towards Trustworthy Elections: New Directions in Electronic Voting, eds. Chaum, David et al. Berlin: IAVOSS/Springer-Verlag, 216–30.
Kinney, Alison. 2016. Hood. New York: Bloomsbury.
Kopley, Emily. 2016. “Anon Is Not Dead: Towards a History of Anonymous Authorship in Early-Twentieth-Century Britain.” Studies in Book Culture 7 (2): 123.
Kuran, Timur. 1993. “Mitigating the Tyranny of Public Opinion: Anonymous Discourse and the Ethic of Sincerity.” Constitutional Political Economy 4 (1): 4178.
Leitner, John. 2015. “Anonymity, Privacy, and Expressive Equality: Name Verification and Korean Constitutional Rights in Cyberspace.” Journal of Korean Law 14 (June): 167212.
Lynch, Michael, and Madonna, Anthony. 2013. “Viva Voce: Implications from the Disappearing Voice Vote, 1865–1996.” Social Science Quarterly 94 (2): 530–50.
MacCallum, Gerald. 1967. “Negative and Positive Freedom.” Philosophical Review 76 (3): 312–34.
Marx, Gary. 1999. “What's in a Name? Some Reflections on the Sociology of Anonymity.” The Information Society 15 (2): 99112.
McCarthy, Matthew. 2015. “Toward a Free Information Movement.” Sociological Forum 30 (2): 439–58.
McDonald, Kevin. 2015. “From Indymedia to Anonymous: Rethinking Action and Identity in Digital Cultures.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (8): 968–82.
Mill, John Stuart. 1946. On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government. Oxford: Blackwell.
Moore, Alfred. 2017. “Anonymity, Pseudonymity, and Deliberation: Why Not Everything Should Be Connected.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 124.
Morris, Adam. 2012. “Whoever, Whatever: On Anonymity as Resistance to Empire.” Parallax 18 (4): 106–20.
Nguyen, Mimi Thi. 2015. “The Hoodie as Sign, Screen, Expectation, and Force.” Signs 40 (4): 791816.
Nissenbaum, Helen. 1997. “Toward an Approach to Privacy in Public: Challenges of Information Technology.” Ethics & Behavior 7 (3): 207–19.
Nissenbaum, Helen. 1999. “The Meaning of Anonymity in an Information Age.” The Information Society: An International Journal 15 (2): 141–44.
Nissenbaum, Helen. 2010. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2010. A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pfitzmann, Andreas, and Hansen, Marit. 2010. A Terminology for Talking about Privacy by Data Minimization: Anonymity, Unlinkability, Undetectability, Unobservability, Pseudonymity, and Identity Management.
Reiman, Jeffrey. 1976. “Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (1): 2644.
Rodriguez, Armado, and Clair, Robin. 1999. “Graffiti as Communication: Exploring the Discursive Tensions of Anonymous Texts.” The Southern Communication Journal 65 (1): 115.
Ruiz, Pollyanna. 2013. “Revealing Power: Masked Protest and the Blank Figure.” Cultural Politics 9 (3): 263–79.
Schmitz, Rachel. 2016. “Intersections of Hate: Exploring the Transecting Dimensions of Race, Religion, Gender, and Family in Ku Klux Klan Web Sites.” Sociological Focus 49 (3): 200–14.
Scott, Craig. 1998. “To Reveal or Not to Reveal: A Theoretical Model of Anonymous Communication.” Communication Theory 8 (4): 381407.
Smith Ekstrand, Victoria, and Jeyaram, Cassandra Imfeld. 2011. “Our Founding Anonymity: Anonymous Speech During the Constitutional Debate.” American Journalism 28 (3): 3560.
Spiegel, Jennifer. 2015. “Masked Protest in the Age of Austerity: State Violence, Anonymous Bodies, and Resistance ‘In the Red.’Critical Inquiry 41 (4): 786810.
Steinholt, Yngvar. 2013. “Kitten Heresy: Lost Contexts of Pussy Riot's Punk Prayer.” Popular Music and Society 36 (1): 120–4.
Suler, John. 2004. “The Online Disinhibition Effect.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 7 (3): 321–26.
Wagner Decew, Judith. 2015. “The Feminist Critique of Privacy: Past Arguments and New Social Understandings.” In Social Dimensions of Privacy, eds. Roessler, Beaate and Mokrosinska, Dorota. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85103.
Wallace, Kathleen. 1999. “Anonymity.” Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1): 2335.
Warren, Samuel, and Brandeis, Louis. 2016. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4 (5): 193220.
Wesch, Michael, and the Digital Ethnography Class of Spring 2009. 2012. “Anonymous, Anonymity, and the End(s) of Identity and Groups Online: Lessons from the ‘First Internet-Based Superconsciousness.’” In Human No More: Digital Subjectivities, Unhuman Subjects, and the End of Anthropology, eds. Whitehead, Neal and Wesch, Michael. Colorado: University Press of Colorado, 89104.
Westin, Alan. 1984. “The Origins of Modern Claims to Privacy.” In Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5674.
Wilde, Oscar. 2007. The Critic as Artist (Upon the Importance of Doing Nothing and Discussing Everything). Stockport: Mondial.
Woo, Jisuk. 2006. “The Right Not to Be Identified: Privacy and Anonymity in the Interactive Media Environment.” New Media & Society 8 (6): 949–67.
Zakaria, Rafia. 2017. Veil. New York: Bloomsbury.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed