Article contents
Dante and the Setting for Machiavellianism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 1982
Abstract
Although Dante and Machiavelli are generally considered exemplars of opposed medieval and modern ways of thinking, there are various points of resemblance in their political arguments. In Dante's Banquet, there is a presentimento machiavellico that illuminates the ideas that form the basis for Machiavellianism. These ideas, in turn, may be seen as extensions of scriptural positions and as Christian modifications of classical attitudes toward hope, certainty, and philosophy.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982
References
Alighieri, Dante. 1964. Il Convivio. Busnelli, G., and Vandelli, G., eds. Florence: Felice Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. 1903. The Convivio of Dante Alighieri. Wicksteed, P. H., tr. London: Dent (The Temple Classics).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1972. The originality of Machiavelli. In Gilmore, M. P., ed., Studies on Machiavelli.. Florence: G.C. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Boyde, Patrick. 1981. Dante: philomythes and philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511553882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantimori, Delio. 1937. Rhetoric and politics in Italian humanism. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes
I:83–102.10.2307/750048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Allan H.
1968. Machiavelli's ‘Prince’ and its forerunners. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Felix. 1939. The humanist concept of the prince and The Prince of Machiavelli. The Journal of Modern History
XI (4): 449–83.10.1086/236395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Felix. 1972. Machiavelli's “Istorie Fiorentine.” In Gilmore, M. P. (ed.), Studies on Machiavelli. Florence: G.C. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1976. Discorso o dialogo intorno alla nostra lingua. Sozzi, B. T., ed. Turin: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1960. Il principe e discorsi. Bertelli, S., ed. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B.
1964. The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McIlwain, Charles. 1932. The growth of political thought in the west. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr.
1979. Machiavelli's new modes and orders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr.
1981. Machiavelli's political science. American Political Science Review
75:293–305.10.2307/1961365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr.
1972. Party and sect in Machiavelli's Florentine histories. In Fleisher, M., ed. Machiavelli and the nature of political thought. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1978. Machiavelli's unchristian charity. American Political Science Review
72:1217–28.10.2307/1954535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, Larry. 1981. Dante and happiness: a political perspective. Medievalia et Humanistica
10: 81–102.Google Scholar
Peterman, Larry. 1973. Dante's Monarchia and Aristotle's political thought. Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History
X:1–40.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.
1975. The Machiavellian moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Prezzolini, Giuseppe. 1970. The Christian roots of Machiavelli's moral pessimism. Review of National Literatures
I:26–42.Google Scholar
Quaglio, Antonio E.
1971. Machiavelli. In Bosco, U., ed. Enciclopedia Dantesca
III:754–7.Google Scholar
Renucci, Paul. 1954. Dante: Disciple et juge du monde Gréco-Latin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ridolfi, Roberto. 1962. Life of Niccolò Machiavelli. Grayson, C., tr. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ullman, Walter. 1970. A history of political thought: the middle ages. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Donald. 1972. Machiavelli and Savonarola. In Gilmore, M. P., ed. Studies on Machiavelli. Florence: G.C. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Whitfield, J. H.
1978. Dante and the Roman world. Italian Studies
XXXIII: 1–19.10.1179/its.1978.33.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, J. H.
1949. Savonarola and the purpose of “The Prince.”
The Modern Language Review
LXIV: 44–59.10.2307/3716532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by