Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia

  • BENJAMIN A. OLKEN (a1)

Abstract

This article presents an experiment in which 49 Indonesian villages were randomly assigned to choose development projects through either representative-based meetings or direct election-based plebiscites. Plebiscites resulted in dramatically higher satisfaction among villagers, increased knowledge about the project, greater perceived benefits, and higher reported willingness to contribute. Changing the political mechanism had much smaller effects on the actual projects selected, with some evidence that plebiscites resulted in projects chosen by women being located in poorer areas. The results suggest that direct participation in political decision making can substantially increase satisfaction and legitimacy.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Benjamin A. Olken is Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 50 Memorial Drive E52-252A, Cambridge, MA, 02142 (bolken@mit.edu).

References

Hide All
Acemoglu, D. 2003. “Why Not a Political Coase Theorem? Social Conflict, Commitment, and Politics.” Journal of Comparative Economics 31 (4): 620–52.
Ackerman, B. A., and Fishkin, J. S.. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B.. 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434): 444–55.
Ansolabehere, S., Gerber, A., and Snyder, J.. 2003. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 767–77.
Antlov, H. 2000. “Village Governance in Indonesia—Past, Present and Future Challenges.” Presented at the PERCIK Conference “Dynamics of Local Politics in Indonesia,” Yogyakarta.
Antlov, H., and Cederroth, S., eds. 2004. Elections in Indonesia: The New Order and Beyond, New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Bardhan, P. 2002. “Decentralization of Governance and Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4): 185205.
Bardhan, P., and Mookherjee, D.. 2006. “Decentralization and Accountability in Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries.” Economic Journal 116: 101–27.
Benhabib, S. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy”. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, S.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 6794.
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.. 2001. “Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data.” American Economic Review 91 (2): 6772.
Chattopadhyay, R., and Duflo, E.. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–43.
Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A.. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 627–35.
Eldersveld, S. J. 1956. “Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 50 (1): 154–65.
Evers, P. J. 2000. “Resourceful Villagers, Powerless Communities: Rural Village Government in Indonesia.” The World Bank. Mimeo.
Feld, L. P., and Matsusaka, J. G.. 2003. “Budget Referendums and Government Spending: Evidence from Swiss Cantons.” Journal of Public Economics 87 (12): 2703–24.
Fishkin, J. S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Frey, B. S., and Stutzer, A.. 2005. “Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility.” Oxford Economic Papers 57 (1): 90111.
Funk, P., and Gathmann, C.. 2007. “Does Direct Democracy Reduce the Size of Government? New Evidence from Historical Data, 1890–2000.” Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Economics Working Paper 1123.
Gerber, A. S., and Green, D. P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 653–63.
Government of Indonesia. 1979. “Law on the Village Government (Undang-undang tentang pemerintahan desa).” Law Number 5.
Green, D. P., and Shapiro, I.. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Guggenheim, S. 2004. “Crises and Contradictions: Understanding the Origins of a Community Development Project in Indonesia.” The World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/Resources/Social/KDP-Crises.pdf (March 7, 2010).
Guggenheim, S., Wiranto, T., Prasta, Y., and Wong, S.. 2004. “Indonesia's Kecamatan Development Program: A Large-Scale Use of Community Development to Reduce Poverty.” Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Process and Conference. Shanghai, May 25–27.
Humphreys, M., Masters, W., and Sandbu, M. E.. 2006. “The Role of Leaders in Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in Sao Tome and Principe.” World Politics 58: 583622.
Jayachandran, S. 2006. “Selling Labor Low: How Workers Respond to Productivity Shocks in Developing Countries.” Journal of Political Economy 114 (3): 538–75.
King, D. Y. 2003. Half-Hearted Reform: Electoral Institutions and the Struggle for Democracy in Indonesia, Westport, CT: Praeger.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R.. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Mansbridge, J. J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Martinez-Bravo, M. 2009. “Appointed Officials and Consolidation of New Democracies.” MIT.
Matsusaka, J. G. 1995. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (3): 587.
Matsusaka, J. G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Matsusaka, J. G. 2005a. “Direct Democracy Works.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2): 185206.
Matsusaka, J. G. 2005b. “The Eclipse of Legislatures: Direct Democracy in the 21st Century.” Public Choice 124 (1): 157–77.
McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka, P.. New York: Academic Press.
Ministry of Home Affairs. 1981. “Instruction Number 6.”
Mutiarin, D. 2006. “The Transformation of Local Governance and Public Participation: A Study of Four Villages in Java after the Reformasi.” Ph.D. diss. University Sains Malaysia.
Olken, B. A. 2007. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Economy 115 (2): 200–49.
Olken, B. A. 2008. “Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 14123.
Olken, B. A., and Singhal, M.. 2009. “Informal Taxation.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 15221.
Pettersson-Lidbom, P., and Tyrefors, B.. 2007. “The Policy Consequences of Direct versus Representative Democracy: A Regression-Discontinuity Approach.” Stockholm University. October 25. http://people.su.se/~pepet/directdem.pdf (March 7, 2010).
Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. “Participation and Development: Perspectives from the Comprehensive Development Paradigm.” Review of Development Economics 6 (2): 163–92.
Wantchekon, L. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin.” World Politics 55 (3): 399422.
World Bank. 2004. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Wright, G. C. 1990. “Misreports of Vote Choice in the 1988 NES Senate Election Study.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15 (4): 543–63.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed