Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution

  • MARK R. BEISSINGER (a1)
Abstract

Using two unusual surveys, this study analyzes participation in the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, comparing participants with revolution supporters, opponents, counter-revolutionaries, and the apathetic/inactive. As the analysis shows, most revolutionaries were weakly committed to the revolution's democratic master narrative, and the revolution's spectacular mobilizational success was largely due to its mobilization of cultural cleavages and symbolic capital to construct a negative coalition across diverse policy groupings. A contrast is drawn between urban civic revolutions like the Orange Revolution and protracted peasant revolutions. The strategies associated with these revolutionary models affect the roles of revolutionary organization and selective incentives and the character of revolutionary coalitions. As the comparison suggests, postrevolutionary instability may be built into urban civic revolutions due to their reliance on a rapidly convened negative coalition of hundreds of thousands, distinguished by fractured elites, lack of consensus over fundamental policy issues, and weak commitment to democratic ends.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Mark R. Beissinger is Henry W. Putnam Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 237 Corwin Hall, Princeton, NJ08544-1013 (mbeissin@princeton.edu)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Jeffrey C Alexander . 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.

Rick Andrews , and Imran Currim. 2003. “Retention of Latent Segments in Regression-Based Marketing Models.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (4): 315–21.

Dominique Arel . 2002. “Interpreting ‘Nationality’ and ‘Language’ in the 2001 Ukrainian Census.” Post-Soviet Affairs 18 (3): 213–49.

Anders Aslund . 2005. “The Economic Policy of Ukraine After the Orange Revolution.”Eurasian Geography and Economics 46 (5): 327–53.

Mark R Beissinger . 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.


Valerie J. Bunce , and Sharon L. Wolchik. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Robert H Dix . 1984. “Why Revolutions Succeed and Fail.”Polity 16 (3) (Spring): 423–46.


Jack A Goldstone . 1994. “Is Revolution Individually Rational?Rationality and Society 6: 139–66.

Jack A Goldstone . 2001. “Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory.”Annual Review of Political Science 4: 139–87.

Jack A Goldstone . 2011. “Cross-class Coalitions and the Making of the Arab Revolts of 2011.” Swiss Political Science Review 17: 457–62.

Jeff Goodwin . 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Mark S Granovetter . 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.


Ronald Inglehart , and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Adrian Karatnycky . 2005. “Ukraine's Orange Revolution.” Foreign Affairs 84 (2): 3552.

Bert Klandermans . 2010. “Peace Demonstrations or Anti-Government Marches? The Political Attitudes of the Protesters.” In The World Says No To War: Demonstrations Against the War on Iraq, eds. Stefaan Walgrave and Dieter Ruchts. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 98118.

Taras Kuzio . 2010. “Nationalism, Identity and Civil Society in Ukraine: Understanding the Orange Revolution.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43: 285–96.

David Lane . 2008. “The Orange Revolution: ‘People's Revolution’ or Revolutionary Coup?The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10 (4): 525–49.

Marc I Lichbach . 1995. The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.


Gerald Marwell , and Pamela Oliver. 1993. The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro‐Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Doug McAdam , and Ronelle Paulsen. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Social Activism.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (November): 640–67.

Mikhail Myagkov , Peter C. Ordeshook, and Dmitry Shakin. 2005. “Fraud or Fairytales: Russia and Ukraine's Electoral Experience.” Post-Soviet Affairs 21 (2): 91131.

Nicolas Olsson-Yaouzis . 2010. “Revolutionaries, Despots, and Rationality.” Rationality and Society 22 (3): 283–99.

Roger D Petersen . 2001. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dankwart A Rustow . 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2 (3): 337–63.

Theda Skocpol . 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dan Slater . 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (1): 203–54.

Viktor Stepanenko . 2005. “How Ukrainians View Their Orange Revolution: Public Opinion and the National Peculiarities of Citizenry Political Activities,” Demokratizatsiya 13 (4) (Fall): 595616.

Victor Stepanenko . 2006. “Civil Society in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Civic Ethos in the Framework of Corrupted Sociality?East European Politics and Societies 20 (4): 571–97.

Mark R. Thompson , and Philipp Kuntz. 2004. “Stolen Elections: The Case of the Serbian October.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 159–72.


Gordon Tullock . 1971. “The Paradox of Revolution.” Public Choice 11: 8999.

Milada Anna Vachudova . 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Stephen White , and Ian McAllister. 2009. “Rethinking the ‘Orange Revolution,’Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (2): 227–54.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×