Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting

  • STEPHEN ANSOLABEHERE (a1), JONATHAN RODDEN (a2) and JAMES M. SNYDER (a1)
Abstract

A venerable supposition of American survey research is that the vast majority of voters have incoherent and unstable preferences about political issues, which in turn have little impact on vote choice. We demonstrate that these findings are manifestations of measurement error associated with individual survey items. First, we show that averaging a large number of survey items on the same broadly defined issue area—for example, government involvement in the economy, or moral issues—eliminates a large amount of measurement error and reveals issue preferences that are well structured and stable. This stability increases steadily as the number of survey items increases and can approach that of party identification. Second, we show that once measurement error has been reduced through the use of multiple measures, issue preferences have much greater explanatory power in models of presidential vote choice, again approaching that of party identification.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Stephen Ansolabehere is Professor, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building E53, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 (sda@mit.edu).
Jonathan Rodden is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, 616 Serra Street, Encina Hall West, Room 444C, Stanford, CA 94305-6044 (jrodden@stanford.edu), to whom correspondence should be addressed.
James M. Snyder, Jr., is Professor, Departments of Political Science and Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building E53, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 (millett@mit.edu).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Alan Abramowitz , and Kyle Saunders . 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60, 3 (August): 634–52.

Stephen Ansolabehere , Jonathan Rodden , and James M. Snyder Jr., 2006. “Purple America.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (Spring): 97118.

D. E. Butler , and D. Stokes . 1974. Political Change in Britain. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.

Philip E. Converse 1980. “Comment: Rejoinder to Judd and Milburn.” American Sociological Review 45 (August): 644– 46.

Geoffrey Evans , Anthony Heath , and Mansur Lalljee . 1996. “Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoritarian Values in the British Electorate.” British Journal of Sociology 47 (March): 93112.

Stanley Feldman . 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (May): 416–40.

Stanley Feldman . 1989. “Measuring Issue Preferences: The Problem of Response Instability.” Political Analysis 1 (1): 2560.

Paul Goren . 1997. “Political Expertise and Issue Voting in Presidential Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 50: 387412.

Donald Green , and Jack Citrin . 1994. “Measurement Error and the Structure of Attitudes: Are Positive and Negative Judgments Opposites?American Journal of Political Science 38, 1 (Feb.): 256–81.

Donald Green , and Bradley Palmquist . 1994. “How Stable is Party Identification?Political Behavior 16, 4 (Dec.): 437–66.

John E. Jackson 1983. “The Systematic Beliefs of the Mass Public: Estimating Policy Preferences with Survey Data.” Journal of Politics 45 (Nov.): 840–65.

Charles M. Judd , and Michael A. Milburn . 1980. “The Structure of Attitude Systems in the General Public: Comparisons of Structural Equation Models.” American Sociological Review 45 (Aug.): 627–43.

V. O. Key 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Steven Klepper , and Edward E. Leamer . 1984. “Consistent Sets of Estimates for Regressions with Errors in All Variables.” Econometrica 52 (Jan.): 163–84.

G. F. Kuder , and M. W. Richardson . 1937. “The Theory of the Estimator of Test Reliability.” Psychometrika 2 (Sept): 151–60.

Robert C. Luskin 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (Nov.): 856–99.

Herbert McClosky , and John Zaller . 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Adam N. Moskowitz , and J. Craig Jenkins . 2004. “Structuring Political Opinions: Attitude Consistency and Democratic Competence among the U.S. Mass Public.” Sociological Quarterly 45 (May): 395419.

Helmut Norpoth , and Lodge Milton . 1985. “The Difference between Attitutes and Nonattitudes in the Mass Public: Just Measurement?American Journal of Political Science 29 (May): 291307.

Benjamin I. Page , and Robert Y. Shapiro . 1982. “Changes in Americans' Policy Preferences, 1935–1979.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46 (Spring): 2442.

Willem Saris , and Paul Sniderman . 2004. Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

D. E. Wiley , and J. A. Wiley . 1970. “The Estimation of Measurement Error in Panel Data.” American Sociological Review 35 (Feb.): 112–16.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 196 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 507 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.