Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Efficient Secrecy: Public versus Private Threats in Crisis Diplomacy


This paper explores when and why private communication works in crisis diplomacy. Conventional audience-cost models suggest that state leaders must go public with their threats in international crises because leaders cannot tie their hands if signals are issued privately. I present a crisis bargaining game where both the sender and the receiver of signals have a domestic audience. The equilibrium analysis demonstrates that a private threat, albeit of limited credibility, can be equally compelling as a fully credible public threat. The analysis suggests that secrecy works in crisis diplomacy despite its informational inefficacy. Secrecy insulates leaders from domestic political consequences when they capitulate to a challenge to avoid risking unwarranted war. The logic of efficient secrecy helps shed light on the unaccounted history of private diplomacy in international crises. The Alaska Boundary Dispute illustrates this logic.

Corresponding author
Shuhei Kurizaki is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, 4348 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4348 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Austen-SmithDavid, and Jeffrey S.Banks. 2000. “Cheap Talk and Burned Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 91 (March): 116.

BaumMatthew A. 2004. “Going Private: Public Opinion, Presidential Rhetoric, and the Domestic Politics of Audience Costs in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (October): 60331.

BlaineyGeoffrey. 1988. The Causes of War. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.

CaiHongbin. 2000. “Bargaining on Behalf of a Constituency.” Journal of Economic Theory 92 (June): 23473.

CrawfordVincent P, and JoelSobel. 1982. “Strategic Information Transmission.” Econometrica 50 (November): 143151.

FearonJames D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (Summer): 379415.

FearonJames D. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (February): 6890.

FinelBernard I, and Kristin M.Lord. 1999. “The Surprising Logic of Transparency.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (June): 31539.

GrosecloseTim, and NolanMcCarty. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (January): 10019.

GuisingerAlexandra, and AlastairSmith. 2002. “Honest Threats: the Interaction of Reputation and Political Institutions in International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (April): 175200.

HolmströmBengt, and Roger B.Myerson. 1983. “Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete Information.” Econometrica 51 (November): 1799819.

JönssonChrister, and MartinHall. 2003. “Communication: An Essential Aspect of Diplomacy.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (May): 195210.

LeventoğluBahar, and AhmerTarar. 2005. “Pre-negotiation Public Commitment in Domestic and International Bargaining.” American Political Science Review 99 (August): 41933.

MorrowJames D. 1989. “Capabilities, Uncertainty, and Resolve: A Limited Information Model of Crisis Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (November): 94172.

O'NeillBarry. 1999. Symbols, Honor, and War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

O'NeillBarry. 2003. “Mediating National Honour: Lessons from the Era of Dueling.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 159 (March): 119.

PowellRobert. 1990. Nuclear Deterrence Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

PowellRobert. 2002. “Bargaining Theory and International Conflict.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 130.

RamsayKristopher W. 2004. “Politics at the Water's Edge: Crisis Bargaining and Electoral Competition.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (August): 45986.

SchultzKenneth A. 1998. “Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises.” American Political Science Review 92 (December): 82944.

SchultzKenneth A. 2001a. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

SchultzKenneth A. 2001b. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (February): 3260.

SlantchevBranislav L. 2005. “Military Coercion in Interstate Crises.” American Political Science Review 99 (November): 53347.

SmithAlastair. 1998. “International Crises and Domestic Politics.” American Political Science Review 92 (September): 62338.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 113 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 378 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.