Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Freedom, Recognition, and Obligation: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory

  • Nancy J. Hirschmann (a1)

Abstract

I argue that a feminist methodology can help liberal political theory get beyond the problems that it has been recycling since the seventeenth century. Taking political obligation as the focus for my analysis, I show how feminist psychoanalytic and psychological theory can help uncover the structural sexism of liberal theory and epistemology and point the way toward more consistent—and less biased—theoretical formulations. Rejecting the essentialist view of gender difference that has been attributed to this literature, I argue that it is more interesting and appropriate to read it as a symbolic language of power and as a heuristic device for uncovering the gendered dimensions of supposedly “neutral” concepts like obligation.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aboulafia, Mitchel. 1984. “From Domination to Recognition.” In Beyond Domination, ed. Gould, Carol C.. Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Allenheld.
Bakan, David. 1986. The Duality of Human Existence: Isolation and Communion in Western Man. Boston: Beacon.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1971. Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brunswick, Ruth Mack. 1940. “The Preoedipal Phase of the Libido Development.” In The Psychoanalytic Reader, ed. Fliess, Robert. New York: International Universities Press.
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chodorow, Nancy. 1979. “Feminism and Difference: Gender, Relation, and Difference in Psychoanalytic Perspective.” Socialist Review 46:5170.
Cranston, Maurice. 1967. “Liberalism.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3–4:458–61. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
DiStefano, Christine. 1988. “Dilemmas of Difference: Feminism, Modernity, and Postmodernism.” Women and Politics 8(3–4): 124.
Dunn, John. 1980. “Consent in the Theory of John Locke.” In Political Obligation in Its Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Fishkin, James. 1979. The Limits of Obligation. New Haven: Yale University.
Flathman, Richard. 1972. Political Obligation. New York: Atheneum.
Flax, Jane. 1978. “The Conflict between Nurturance and Autonomy in Mother-Daughter Relationships and within Feminism.” Feminist Studies 4(2):171191.
Flax, Jane. 1983. “Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious.” In Discovering Reality, ed. Harding, Sandra H. and Hintikka, Merrill B.. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psycho-logical Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In Discovering Reality, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
Hartsock, Nancy. 1984. Money, Sex, and Power: Towards a Feminist Historical Materialism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Hegel, Georg W. F. 1977. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Miller, Arnold Vincent. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hirschmann, Nancy. N.d. Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Forthcoming.
Hume, David. 1948. Hume's Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Aiken, Henry. New York: Hafner.
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.
Johnstone, Kay. 1985. Two Moral Orientations-Two Problem Solving Strategies: Adolescents' Solutions to Dilemmas in Fables. Ph.D. diss. Harvard University.
King, Martin Luther. 1969. “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” In Civil Disobedience, ed. Bedau, Hugo Adam. New York: Pegasus.
Kittay, Eva Feder, and Meyers, Diana T.. 1987. Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Locke, John. 1964. Second Treatise. Ed. Laslett, Peter. New York: New American Library.
Lyons, Nona. 1983. “Two Perspectives on Self; Relationships, and Morality.” Harvard Educational Review 53:125–45.
Macpherson, Crawford B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. London: Oxford University Press.
Mahler, Margaret. 1968. On Human Symbiosis and the Vicissitudes of Individuation. New York: International Universities Press.
Pateman, Carole. 1980. “Women and Consent.” Political Theory 8:149–68.
Pateman, Carole. 1985. The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pitkin, Hannah. 1965. “Obligation and Consent,” pt. 1. American Political Science Review 59:9901000.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1988. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon.
Presston, Larry M. 1984. “Freedom, Markets, and Voluntary Exchange.” American Political Science Review 78:959–70.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rosaldo, Michelle, and Lamphere, Louise, eds. 1974. Woman, Culture, and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tronto, Joan. 1987. “Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care.” Signs 12:644–63.
Tussman, Joseph. 1960. Obligation and the Body Politic. New York: Oxford University Press.

Freedom, Recognition, and Obligation: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory

  • Nancy J. Hirschmann (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.