Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:31:31.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Possibility of Liberal Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1985

Jonathan Riley
Jonathan Riley*
Affiliation:
Tulane University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A complex liberal version of utilitarianism is introduced which bears similarities to John Stuart Mill's moral and political philosophy and offers a promising approach to liberal democratic theory. Formally, liberal utilitarianism is represented as a type of generalized social welfare functional which maps any given set of individual vector-valued utility functions into a social ordering. The generalized social welfare functional in question relies on the experienced members of society to classify ond compare the different kinds of utilities found in individual vectors; to grant and protect libertarian rights with respect to a well-defined private kind of individual utilities; and to make the interpersonal comparisons required to aggregate over each of the public kinds of individual utilities. At the same time, it is dynamic in that it implicitly comprehends many different levels of a society's moral development from a liberal perspective.

An axiomatization of the ideal liberal utilitarian social welfare functional is provided such that, on the one hand, each person has an absolute right to individual liberty over the issues within his private sphere, and, on the other hand, has an equal voice in a liberty-respecting, strongly monotonk, anonymous and neutral public choice rule operating in a distinct public sphere. The harmony of these private and public components implies the possibility of an ideal liberal democracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 1135 - 1151
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B.A. Social justice in the liberal state. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice. American Economic Review, 1977,67, 219–225.Google Scholar
d'Aspremont, C., & Gevers, L. Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. Review of Economic Studies, 1977, 44, 199–209.10.2307/2297061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. The liberal theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Berger, F.R. Happiness, justice and freedom: The moral and political philosophy of J. S. Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.10.1525/9780520347199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. Four essays on liberty (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Davis, M. Liberalism and/or democracy? Social theory and Practice, 1983, 9, 51–72.10.5840/soctheorpract1983913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, G. Marx and Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. Western political theory in the face of the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978. (a)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. Liberalism. In Hampshire, S. (Ed.). Public and private morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. (b)Google Scholar
Eells, E. Rational decision and causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.10.1017/CBO9781316534823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, R.B. A new exploration of Mill's essay On Liberty. Political Studies, 1966,14, 281–304.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1966.tb00412.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, W. Justice and the human good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Galston, W. Defending liberalism. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 621–629.10.2307/1963735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. A Pareto consistent libertarian claim. Journal of Economic Theory, 1974, 7, 388–410.10.1016/0022-0531(74)90111-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J.N. John Stuart Mill: Traditional and revisionist interpretations. Literature of Liberty, 1979, 2, 7–37.Google Scholar
Gray, J.N. John Stuart Mill on liberty, utility and rights. Nomos, 1981,23, 80–116.Google Scholar
Gray, J.N. John Stuart Mill's doctrine of liberty: A defence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar
Grote, J. An examination of the utilitarian philosophy. Cambridge: Deighton Bell, 1870.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. Ex post optimality as a dynamically consistent objective for collective choice under uncertainty. In Pattanaik, P. & Salles, M. (Eds.). Social choice and welfare. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. Ethical theory and utilitarianism. In Lewis, H. D. (Ed.). Contemporary British philosophy (Vol. 4). London: Allen & Unwin, 1976.Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. Moral thinking: Its levels, method and point. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.10.1093/0198246609.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J.C. Bayesian decision theory, subjective and objective probabilities, and acceptance of empirical hypotheses. Synthese, 1983, 57, 341–364.10.1007/BF01064702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F.A. The constitution of liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960.Google Scholar
Levine, A. Liberal democracy: A critique of its theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981.10.7312/levi91812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, D.J.S. Mill's theory of morality. Nous, 1976, 10, 101–119.10.2307/2214571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, D. Human rights and the general welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1911, 6, 113–129.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. Mill's theory of justice. In Goldman, A. I. & Kim, J. (Eds.). Values and morals. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. Liberty and harm to others. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1979, Suppl. Vol. V, 1–19.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. Utility and rights. Nomos, 1982,24, 107–138.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C.B. The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
McCloskey, H.J. John Stuart Mill: A critical study. London: Macmillan, 1971.10.1007/978-1-349-15420-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J.S. Whewell on moral philosophy. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. X). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969. (a)Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. Utilitarianism. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. X). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969. (b)Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vols. VII-VIII). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. On the use and abuse of political terms. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. XVIII). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. (a)Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. Civilization. In Robson, J. M. (Eds.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. XVIII). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. (b)Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. On liberty. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. XVIII). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. (c)Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. Considerations on representative government. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. XIX). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. (d)Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. An examination of Sir William Hamilton's philosophy and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. IX). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. Inaugural address delivered to the University of St. Andrew's. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. XXI). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984. (a)Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. The subject of women. In Robson, J. M. (Ed.). Collected works of J. S. Mill (Vol. XXI). Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984. (b)Google Scholar
Nozick, R. Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford: Black-well, 1974.Google Scholar
Pennock, J.R. Epilogue. Nomos, 1983, 25, 408–429.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, J.P. The English utilitarians. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar
Plott, C.R. Axiomatic social choice theory: An overview and interpretation. American Journal of Political Science, 1976, 20, 511–596.10.2307/2110686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. Universalizability. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.10.1007/978-94-009-9484-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.10.4159/9780674042605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. Social unity and primary goods. In Sen, A. K. & Williams, B. (Eds.). Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Riley, J. Collective choice and individual liberty: A revisionist interpretation of J. S. Mill's utilitarianism. University of Oxford D.Phil, dissertation, 1983.Google Scholar
Riley, J. Liberal utilitarianism: A formal theory of liberal democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. (a)Google Scholar
Riley, J. Utility in the largest sense: An interpretation of J. S. Mill's moral and political philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. (b)Google Scholar
Riley, J. Liberty, justice and paternalism. In Attig, T., Bradie, M., & Callen, D. (Eds.). The restraint of liberty (Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy, Vol. 7). Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green State University Press, 1985. (c)Google Scholar
Riker, W. Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1982.Google Scholar
Ryan, A.Mr. McCloskey on Mill's liberalism. Philosophical Quarterly, 1964,14, 253–260.10.2307/2955467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. The philosophy of John Stuart Mill. London: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
Schofield, N. The general relevance of the impossibility theorem in smooth social choice. Theory and Decision, 1984, 16, 21–44.10.1007/BF00141673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, T. The logic of collective choice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day (distribution taken over by North-Holland), 1970.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. Liberty, unanimity and rights. Economica, 1976, 43, 217–245.10.2307/2553122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K. On weights and measures: Informational constraints in social welfare analysis. Econometrica, 1977, 45, 1539-1572.10.2307/1913949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K. Personal utilities and public judgements: Or what's wrong with welfare economics? Economic Journal, 1979, 89, 537–558. (a)10.2307/2231867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K. Interpersonal comparisons of welfare. In Boskin, M. (Ed.). Economics and human welfare. New York: Academic Press, 1979. (b)Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. Plural utility. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1981, 81, 193–215.10.1093/aristotelian/81.1.193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K. Liberty as control: An appraisal. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 1982, 7, 245–263.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1982.tb00092.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K. Liberty and social choice. Journal of Philosophy, 1983, 80, 5–28.10.2307/2026284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.K. Social choice theory. In Arrow, K. J. & Intriligator, M. D. (Eds.). Handbook of mathematical economics (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: North Holland, 1985.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K., & Williams, B. Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.10.1017/CBO9780511611964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, J.F. Liberty, equality, fraternity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Spragens, T.A. The irony of liberal reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Suzumura, K. Resolving conflicting views of justice in social choice. In Pattanaik, P. & Salles, M. (Eds.). Social choice and welfare. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Ten, C. Mill on liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.C. John Stuart Mill and representative government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Williams, B. Introduction. In Hardy, H. (Ed.). Concepts and categories: Philosophical essays of Isaiah Berlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Williams, B. Moral luck: Philosophical essays 1973-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.10.1017/CBO9781139165860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R.P. The poverty of liberalism. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. John Stuart Mill and the limits of state action. Social Research, 1973, 40, 1–30.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin: The ends of life and the preliminaries of morality. In Ryan, A. (Ed.). The idea of freedom: Essays in honour of Isaiah Berlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar