Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T21:43:43.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Party in Uniform: Toward a Theory of Civil-Military Relations in Communist Political Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1982

Amos Perlmutter  and
William M. LeoGrande
Amos Perlmutter
Affiliation:
American University
William M. LeoGrande
Affiliation:
American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is an effort to establish a comparative theoretical framework for the study of civil-military relations in communist political systems. Although the literature on civil-military relations in polyarchic and praetorian polities is theoretically as well as empirically rich, theories of civil-military relations in the field of comparative communism are still at the preliminary stage of development. It is argued that civil-military relations, like all the fundamental dynamics of communist political systems, derive from the structural relationship between a hegemonic Leninist party and the other institutions of the polity. Although the party directs and supervises all other institutions, its political supremacy is necessarily limited by the division of labor among various institutions. The relative autonomy of the military and its relations with the party vary from one country to another and can be described as coalitional, symbiotic, or fused. These relations are dynamic, changing over time in each country in response to contextual circumstances. The role of the military in politics is complex and variegated: on ideological issues, there is usually little conflict between party and army; on issues of “normal politics,” the military acts as a functionally specific elite engaged in bargaining to defend its perceived institutional interests; and in crisis politics, the military is a political resource that various party factions seek to enlist against their opponents.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 778 - 789
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, D. E. 1980. A comparative conceptualization of civil-military relations. World Politics 32:553–76.10.2307/2010057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, C. et al. eds. 1973. Comparative communist political leadership. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Bienen, H. ed. 1969. The military intervention. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Brandt, C. 1957. Stalin's failure in China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. 1974. Soviet politics and political science. New York: St. Martin's Press.10.1007/978-1-349-01567-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, J. C. ed. 1966. The politics of the Chinese Red Army. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Colton, T. 1979. Commissars, commanders, and civilian authority. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674497443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, G. 1956. The politics of the Prussian army. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Debray, R. 1967. Revolution in the revolution? tr. Ortiz, B., New York: Grove.10.14452/MR-019-03-1967-07_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, J. I. 1980. Cuba: order and revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. 1942. The Soviet high command 1918–1941. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, R. B. ed. 1970. Political leadership in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. 1962. The man on horseback. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fleron, F. J. Jr. 1971. Communist studies and the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Gittings, J. 1967. The role of the Chinese army. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, P. H. B. 1976. The PLA and political control in China's provinces: a structural analysis. Comparative Politics 9:1–20.10.2307/421289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, P. H. B. 1978. Professionalism and politics in the Chinese armed forces. In Civil-military relations in communist systems, ed. Herspring, D. R. and Volgyes, I.. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gripp, R. C. 1973. The political system of communism. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Herspring, D. R. and Volgyes, I. eds. 1978. Studies in Comparative Communism. 11:207–334.Google Scholar
Herspring, D. R. 1978. Civil-military relations in communist systems. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hough, J. F. 1977. The Soviet Union and social science theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674498921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1957. The soldier and the state. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1968. Political order in changing society. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ionescu, G. 1972. Comparative communist politics. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-01381-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janowitz, M. 1977. Military institutions and coercion in the developing nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joffe, E. 1967. Party and army: professionalism and political control in the Chinese officers corps, 1949–1964. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard East Asian Monographs.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. ed. 1970. Change in communist systems. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolkowicz, R. 1967. The Soviet military and the Communist party. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kolkowicz, R. 1979. The civil-military relations in the USSR, 1945–1980. Unpublished. Presented at a conference on “Civil-Military Relations in Socialist and Modernizing Polities,” Santa Barbara, Calif.Google Scholar
Lane, D. 1976. The socialist-industrial state. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, H. Y. 1978. The politics of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520310148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeoGrande, W. M. 1978a. The politics of revolutionary development: civil-military relations in Cuba. Journal of Strategic Studies 1:260–95.10.1080/01402397808437003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeoGrande, W. M. 1978b. The case of Cuba. In Civil-military relations in communist systems, ed. Herspring, D. R. and Volgyes, I.. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lovell, J. P., and Kronenberg, P. S. 1974. New civil-military relations. New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
Lyons, E. 1961. The new civil-military relations. American Political Science Review 55:53–63.10.2307/1976049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, E. 1977. Soldiers in politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Odom, W. 1973. The Soviet volunteers. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Odom, W. 1978. The party-military connection: a critique. In Civil-military relations in communist systems, ed. Herspring, D. R. and Volgyes, I.. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, A. 1981. Modern authoritarianism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, A. 1977. The military and politics in modern times. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ralston, D. 1967. The army of the republic. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scalapino, R. A. ed. 1972. Elites in the People's Republic of China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. 1952. Chinese communism and the rise of Mao. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.; Brandt, K.; and Fairbank, J. K. 1953. A documentary analysis of Chinese communism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wesson, R. G. 1978. Communism and communist systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Whitson, W. W. 1973. The Chinese high command. New York: Praeger.10.1007/978-1-349-01980-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.