Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:26:27.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Policy-Oriented Theory of Corruption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Tevfik F. Nas
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Flint
Albert C. Price
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Flint
Charles T. Weber
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Flint

Abstract

Perspectives from political science and economics are drawn on to suggest an integrated theory of governmental corruption. The theory is oriented toward policy choices, and corruption is viewed as a product of individual and structural variables that interact to produce both positive and negative consequences. Individual-level considerations such as greed and the likelihood of detection and prosecution suggest one set of policies for reducing corruption. Bureaucratic constraints, citizen participation, and the congruence of legal structures and social demands offer a competing set of concerns that must be dealt with in analyzing corrupt practices. We show that corruption, as a process, influences the optimal level of social welfare. Alternative conceptions are examined, and a model is developed to evaluate policy choices related to corruption from the perspective of welfare optimization. Applied to the analysis of corruption, the model integrates general equilibrium theory, deterrence theory, and structural conditions. Finally, policy implications are considered.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, Gary S. 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 78:169217.Google Scholar
Bowers, William J., and Pierce, Glenn L.. 1975. The Illusion of Deterrence in Isaac Ehrlich's Research on Capital Punishment. Yale Law Journal, 85:187208.Google Scholar
Cook, Phillip J. 1980. Punishment and Crime: A Critique of Current Findings Concerning the Preventative Effects of Punishment. In Andreano, Ralph and Siegfried, John J., eds., The Economics of Crime. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
De Allesi, Louis. 1983. Property Rights, Transaction Costs, and X-Effidency: An Essay on Economic Theory. American Economic Review, 73:6481.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Isaac. 1973. Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81:521–67.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Isaac. 1975. The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of life and Death. American Economic Review, 65:397417.Google Scholar
Forst, Brian E. 1976. Particiption in Illegitimate Activities: Further Empirical Findings. Policy Analysis, 2:477–92.Google Scholar
Gardiner, John A. 1970. The Politics of Corruption: Organized Crime in an American City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gardiner, John A., and Olson, David J., eds. 1974. Theft of the City. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Graaff, Johannes De V. 1975. Theoretical Welfare Economics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J., ed. 1970. Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Johnson, Michael. 1982. Political Corruption and Public Policy in America. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Knapp Commission. 1973. Grass-Eaters and Meat-Eaters. In Gardiner, John A. and Olson, David J., eds., Theft of the City. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1972. The Latent Functions of the Machine. In Stave, Bruce M., ed., Urban Bosses, Machines, and Progressive Reformers. Lexington: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. 1967. Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. American Political Science Review, 61:417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passell, Peter, and Taylor, John B.. 1977. The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Another View. American Economic Review, 67:445–61.Google Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1978. Political Corruption in America. American Political Science Review, 72:974–84.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogow, Arnold A., and Lasswell, Harold. 1963. Power, Corruption and Rectitude. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1978. Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rundquist, Barry S., Strom, Gerald S., and Peters, John G.. 1977. Corrupt Politicians and Their Electoral Support. American Political Science Review, 71:954–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Upton. 1946. The Jungle. Cambridge, MA: R. Bentley. (Originally published in 1908.)Google Scholar
Tresch, Richard W. 1981. Public Finance, A Normative Theory. Piano, TX: Business Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1980. Does Punishment Deter Crime? In Andreano, Ralph and Siegfried, John J., eds., Economics of Crime. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Johnson, Christopher. 1981. The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89:642–64.Google Scholar
Werner, Simcha B. 1983. New Directions in the Study of Administrative Corruption. Public Administration Review, 43:146–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1966. The Shame of the States. The Public Interest, 2:2838.Google Scholar
Witte, Anne D. 1980. Estimating the Economic Model of Crime with Individua Data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94:5783.Google Scholar