Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:51:59.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Soundings in the Party System: Rural Precinct Committeemen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Leon Weaver
Leon Weaver
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Students of political phenomena have shown an increasing interest, during the past few years, in objective analysis of the functioning of party machinery and of the men who make up that machinery. If the publications on the subject which have come to the writer's attention are typical, the existing literature on party organization practically ignores such organization in rural areas and contains no systematic survey of the opinions and sentiments of organization politicians. The present study is designed as a contribution toward remedying this situation.

Type
American Government and Politics
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1940 , pp. 76 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Party and Government Control at the Grass Roots,” National Municipal Review, Vol. 24, p. 16 (Jan., 1935).

2 There was not much difference between the parties in the percentage of voters voting for committeeman, although the percentages in the Democratic primary were a little higher.

3 Op. cit., p. 17.

4 Gosnell, Harold F., Machine Politics: Chicago Model (University of Chicago Press, 1937), p. 54.Google Scholar

5 The figures for New York relate only to Republican committeemen, and hence are not comparable with the figures for the rural Illinois counties in this respect, since the Republican party did not have control of state or federal patronage at the time the study was made.

6 Op. cit., p. 17.

7 The better educated committeemen may have replied in greater proportions than those less well educated, but the bias in sampling, if there was one, would presumably be about the same in both parties.

8 Op. cit., p. 17.

9 Gosnell, op. cit., p. 192.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.