Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices



One-dimensional spatial models have come to inform much theorizing and research on the U.S. Supreme Court. However, we argue that judicial preferences vary considerably across areas of the law, and that limitations in our ability to measure those preferences have constrained the set of questions scholars pursue. We introduce a new approach, which makes use of information about substantive similarity among cases, to estimate judicial preferences that vary across substantive legal issues and over time. We show that a model allowing preferences to vary over substantive issues as well as over time is a significantly better predictor of judicial behavior than one that only allows preferences to vary over time. We find that judicial preferences are not reducible to simple left-right ideology and, as a consequence, there is substantial variation in the identity of the median justice across areas of the law during all periods of the modern court. These results suggest a need to reconsider empirical and theoretical research that hinges on the existence of a single pivotal median justice.


Corresponding author

Benjamin E. Lauderdale is Lecturer, Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, Columbia House, Houghton Street, London, UKWC2A 2AE (
Tom S. Clark is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Emory University, 327 Tarbutton Hall, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 (


Hide All
Alfano, Sean. 2009. “The Kennedy Court.” (accessed August 3, 2012).
Bailey, Michael A. 2007. “Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 433–48.
Baird, Vanessa A. 2007. Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Bonica, Adam. 2010. A Day by Day Measure of Legislator Ideology, Ph.D. thesis. New York University.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Wright, John R.. 1998. “Lobbying for Justice: Organized Interests, Supreme Court Nominations, and the United States Senate.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 499523.
Cameron, Charles M., Cover, Albert D., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutionalist Model.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 525–34.
Clark, Tom S., and Lauderdale, Benjamin. 2010. “Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 871–90.
Clinton, Joshua D., and Meirowitz, Adam. 2003. “Integrating Roll Call Analysis and Voting Theory: A Framework.” Political Analysis 11: 381–96.
Clinton, Joshua D., Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355–70.
Cole, David. 2006. “The ‘Kennedy Court’.” The Nation, July 31.
deFigueiredo, John M. 2005. “Strategic Plaintiffs and Ideological Judges in Telecommunications Litigation.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 21 (2): 501–23.
Eddelbuettel, Dirk, and François, Romain. 2011. “Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration.” Journal of Statistical Software 40 (8): 118. (accessed August 3, 2012).
Greenhouse, Linda. 2005. Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun's Supreme Court Journey. New York: Times Books.
Greenhouse, Linda. 2010. “Is the ‘Kennedy Court’ Over?” (accessed August 3, 2012).
Grofman, Bernard, and Brazill, Timothy J.. 2002. “Identifying the Median Justice on the Supreme Court through Multidimensional Scaling: Analysis of “Natural Courts “1953–1991.” Public Choice 112 (1/2): 5579.
Ho, Daniel E., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2010. “How Not to Lie with Judicial Votes: Misconceptions, Measurement, and Models.” California Law Review 98 (3): 813–76.
Jessee, Stephen. 2009. “Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review 103: 5981.
Kastellec, Jonathan P., Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2010. “Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees.” Journal of Politics 72 (3): 767–84.
Krehbiel, Keith. 2007. “Supreme Court Appointments as a Move-the-Median Game.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 231–40.
Lane, Charles. 2006. “Kennedy Reigns Supreme on Court.” Washington Post, July 2.
Lax, Jeffrey R. 2007. “Constructing Legal Rules on Appellate Courts.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 591604.
Lax, Jeffrey R. 2011. “The New Judicial Politics of Legal Doctrine.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 131–57.
Lithwick, Dahlia. 2006. “Swing Time.” (accessed August 3, 2012).
Londregan, John. 2000. “Estimating Legislators’ Preferred Points.” Political Analysis 8 (1): 3556.
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10: 134–53.
Moraski, Byron J., and Shipan, Charles R.. 1999. “The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1069–95.
Newman, Roger K. 1997. Hugo Black: A Biography. New York: Fordham University Press.
Peress, Michael. 2009. “Small Chamber Ideal Point Estimation.” Political Analysis 17: 276–90.
Poole, Keith T. 2000. “Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data.” Political Analysis 8 (2): 211–37.
Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spaeth, Harold, Epstein, Lee, Ruger, Ted, Whittington, Keith, Segal, Jeffrey, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “The Supreme Court Database.” (accessed August 23, 2010).
Spriggs, James F. II, and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2002. “The U.S. Supreme Court's Incorporation and Interpretation of Precedent.” Law and Society Review 32 (1): 139–59.
Stephenson, Karen, and Zelen, Marvin. 1989. “Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Examples.” Social Networks 11: 137.
Tahk, Alexander M. 2006. “A New Approach to Optimal Classification.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
Wasserman, Larry. 2005. All of Nonparametric Statistics. New York: Springer.
Whittington, Keith E. 2005. “The Burger Court, 1969-1986: Once More in Transition.” In The United States Supreme Court: The Pursuit of Justice, ed. Tomlins, Christopher. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 300–22.
Yates, Jeff L., and Coggins, Elizabeth. 2009. “The Intersection of Judicial Attitudes and Litigant Seleciton Theories: Explaining U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 29 (1): 263–99.
Zucco, Cesar Jr., and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2011. “Distinguishing Between Influences on Brazilian Legislative Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 363–96.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.