Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T07:43:52.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Happened to the British Party Model?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Leon D. Epstein
Leon D. Epstein*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Admired during much of this century, the British party model became especially attractive to American political scientists seeking responsible-party government in the early postwar years. After the mid-1960s, the model's appeal declined as did Britain's national status and the hopes for the democratic socialism often associated with the model. In the 1970s, the model itself seems to have worked in a way unlike that of prior decades. From this intellectual case history, a few broad inferences are drawn about the changing perspectives of political scientists.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , September 1980 , pp. 9 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APSA Committee on Political Parties (1950). “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System.” American Political Science Review 44: Supplement.Google Scholar
Bagehot, Walter (1877). The English Constitution and Other Political Essays. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. (1962). “New Structures of Democracy.” In Chambers, William N. and Salisbury, Robert H. (eds.), Democracy Today. New York: Collier, pp. 45–79.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. (1965). British Politics in the Collectivist Age. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. (1969). British Politics in the Collectivist Age. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.Google Scholar
Broder, David S. (1972). The Party's Over. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Broder, David S. (1979). “Parties in Trouble.” Today, 05 11, 1979, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1970). Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor (1963). The Deadlock of Democracy: Four-Party Politics in America. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Butler, David (1955). “American Myths about British Parties.” Virginia Quarterly Review 31: 46–56.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald (1974). Political Change in Britain. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, David (1975). The Labour Party and the Struggle for Socialism. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor (1976). “Party Identification Theory and Political Change in Britain.” In Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Fairlie, Dennis (eds.), Party Identification and Beyond. London: Wiley, pp. 31–61.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard (1964). The Reform of Parliament. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Crotty, William J. (1977). Political Reform and the American Experiment. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Crotty, William J.Economist (1975). Nov. 22, 1975, p. 22.Google Scholar
Crotty, William J. (1977). “Blowing Up a Tyranny.” Nov. 5, 1977, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
Epstein, Leon D. (1978). “Political Science and Presidential Nominations.” Political Science Quarterly 93:177–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Herman (1949). The Theory and Practice of Modern Government. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Ford, Henry Jones (1898). The Rise and Growth of American Politics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Groth, Alexander (1970). “Britain and America: Some Requisites of Leadership Compared.” Political Science Quarterly 85: 217–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Charles E. (1974). Presidential Power and Accountability: Toward a New Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Pendleton (1940). Presidential Leadership. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1977). The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor (1936). Cabinet Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor (1939). Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Dennis (1974). “An American Science of British Politics.” Political Studies 22: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony (1977). Britain Says Yes. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Evron M. (1971). “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: Political Science, Policy Science, or Pseudo-Science?” American Political Science Review 65: 965–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, William S. (1976). “Britain and America: The Institutionalization of Accountability.” Journal of Politics 38: 879–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, A. Lawrence (1889). Essays on Government. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lowell, A. Lawrence (1902). “The Influence of Party Upon Legislation in England and America.” Annual Report of the American Historical Association. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Lowell, A. Lawrence (1908). The Government of England. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, A. Lawrence (1910). “The Physiology of Politics.” American Political Science Review 4: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHenry, Dean E. (1940). His Majesty's Opposition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Robert (1955). British Political Parties. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, John P. (1976). “The Declining Respect for the Law.” In King, Anthony (ed.), Why Is Britain Becoming Harder to Govern? London: British Broadcasting Corporation, pp. 74–95.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew (1975). “Is Democratic Control of Capitalist Economies Possible?” In Lindberg, Leon N., Alford, Robert, Crouch, Colin, and Offe, Claus (eds.), Stress and Contradiction in Modern Capitalism. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, pp. 13–56.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miliband, Ralph (1961). Parliamentary Socialism. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Miliband, Ralph (1973). The State in Capitalist Society. London: Quartet Books.Google Scholar
Miliband, Ralph (1977). Marxism and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minkin, Lewis (1978). The Labour Party Conference. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R. (1976). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip (1975). Dissension in the House of Commons: Intra-Party Dissent in the House of Commons' Division Lobbies 1945–1974. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Philip (1976). “The Government Defeat: 10 March 1976.” The Parliamentarian 57: 174–75.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip (1977). “Intra-Party Dissent in the House of Commons: The Parliament of 1974.” The Parliamentarian 58: 240–45.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip (1978). “Government Defeats in the House of Commons: Three Restraints Overcome.” The Parliamentarian 59: 231–38.Google Scholar
Ogg, Frederic A. (1929). English Government and Politics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald (1971). “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System? What, Again?” Journal of Politics 33: 916–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Don K. (1943). “The Parliamentary and Presidential Systems.” Public Administration Review 3: 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, Austin (1962). The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ranney, Austin (1965). Pathways to Parliament. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Jorgen S. (1979). “Was Guy Fawkes Right?” In Kramnick, Isaac (ed.), Is Britain Dying?: Perspectives on the Current Crisis. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, pp. 97–125.Google Scholar
Saloma, John S., and Sontag, Frederick H. (1972). Parties: The Real Opportunity for Effective Citizen Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1948). The Struggle for Party Government. College Park: University of Maryland Press.Google Scholar
Turner, John E. (1978). Labour's Doorstep Politics in London. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, R. Emmett, ed. (1977). The Future That Doesn't Work: Social Democracy's Failures in Britain. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth (1967). Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow (1885). Congressional Government. Boston: Hough ton Mifflin.Google Scholar