Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:47:29.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business As Usual: Maya and Merchants on Yucatán-Belize border at the Onset of the Caste War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Rajeshwari Dutt
Rajeshwari Dutt*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On September 13, 1849, Yucatecan forces at Chac Creek, near the port city of Bacalar (in present-day Quintana Roo), stopped and searched a vessel named Four Sisters, owned by the Belizean merchant, Austin W. Cox. Inside they uncovered kegs containing 73 arrobas (25-pound kegs) of gunpowder and 16 arrobas of lead. Manned by three black men, the vessel also carried a Maya on whom the search party found incriminating evidence, in the form of a letter from Cox to Maya rebel leader Jacinto Pat. The letter made it clear that the gunpowder was meant for the Maya insurgents who were fighting against Mexican authorities in the Yucatán's raging Caste War. Historians of the Caste War period have consistently recognized that the Belizean authorities ignored the munitions trade that flourished between Mexico and Belize during the conflict. Largely unexplored has been the critical role that merchants and munitions traders played in shaping the British government's attitude, and consequently its policies, toward Maya groups during this volatile period.

Type
Articles
Information
The Americas , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 201 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. This is the implicit assumption in most of the scholarly work concerning the role of Belize during Yucatán's Caste War. Renate Mayr explicitly states it in Mayr, Belize: Tracking the Path of its History (Berlin: LIT Verlag, 2014), 221 Google Scholar.

2. Various factors have been cited as causes of the Caste War. For examination of the agrarian question, as well as the early historiography concerning the land question in understanding the outbreak of the Caste War, see Patch, Robert, “Decolonization, the Agrarian Problem, and the Origins of the Caste War, 1812–1847,” in Land, Labor, and Capital in Modern Yucatán: Essays in Regional History and Political Economy, Brannon, Jeffrey and Joseph, Gilbert, eds. (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1991)Google Scholar. For a recent take on the land question that treats as well the effects of municipalization, see Pineda, Arturo Güémez, Mayas, gobierno y tierras frente a la acometida liberal en Yucatán (Mérida: UADY, 2005)Google Scholar. For a political interpretation including effects of the factional struggles of Yucatecan elite on the Caste War, see Gabbert, Wolfgang, Becoming Maya: Ethnicity and Social Inequality in Yucatán since 1500 (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2004)Google Scholar. For various other contributing factors including the decline of Maya elite, contestation over taxation, and effects of municipal politics, see Rugeley, Terry, Yucatán's Maya Peasantry and the Origins of the Caste War (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1996)Google Scholar; and Rugeley, “Rural Political Violence and the Origins of the Caste War,” The Americas 53:4 (April 1997)Google Scholar.

3. In this article I use the term “Belize” to refer to the entire area within the present-day boundaries. The area was known as the Settlement in the Bay of Honduras in the eighteenth century and British Honduras from the mid nineteenth century to 1973, when it was officially named Belize. It is to be noted that when contemporaries used the term “Belize” in the nineteenth century they referred mainly to the town of Belize. Campbell, Mavis, Becoming Belize: A History of an Outpost of Empire Searching for Identity, 1528–1823 (Kingston: University of West Indies Press, 2011), 3 Google Scholar; Bolland, O. Nigel, Colonialism and Resistance in Belize: Essays in Historical Sociology (Belize: Cubola, 2009), 45 note 1Google Scholar.

4. Dumond, Don, in The Machete and the Cross: Campesino Rebellion in Yucatan (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997)Google Scholar, has significantly helped us understand the extent of Belizean involvement in the Caste War, especially from the rebel side. Lapointe, Marie’s Los Mayas rebeldes de Yucatán (Zamora: El Colegio de Michoacán, 1983)Google Scholar was one of the first works to explore the role of Belize in the Maya rebellion. Lapointe sees the Caste War as intrinsically tied to the history of Anglo-American and Anglo-Mexican diplomacy. Her book suggests that the British played a pivotal role in prolonging the conflict, especially as Belizean capitalists continued furnishing arms and supplying ammunition to the rebels. Similarly, Christopher Paetzold has argued that the success of the Maya rebels was tied to the British supply of arms and ammunition. Paetzold, “The British Participation in the Caste War of Yucatán, 1847–1901” (Master's thesis: Dalhousie University, Proquest Theses and Dissertations, 1994). Terry Rugeley has pointed to the separate identity of Yucatan's eastern communities, or Oriente, arising out of the proximity of its border with Belize, suggesting that this separateness proved fertile ground for the beginning of the rebellion there. Rugeley, Rebellion Now and Forever: Mayas, Hispanics, and Caste War Violence in Yucatán, 1800–1880 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009), 52 Google Scholar.

5. Patch, “Decolonization,” 52.

6. The traditional view that the British were guided by an imperialistic design on Central America was put forth in the 1850s by diplomats like E. G. Squier. See Olien, Michael D., “E. G. Squier and the Miskito: Anthropological Scholarship and Political Propaganda,” Ethnohistory 32: 2 (Spring 1985), 111–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Many historians uncritically accepted this interpretation, among them Joseph Demman, “The History of British-American Relations in Central America, 1783 to 1850” (Master's thesis: Proquest Dissertations and Thesis Database, 1935). Naylor, Robert, in Penny Ante Imperialism: The Mosquito Shore and the Bay of Honduras, 1600–1914 (London: Associated University Press, 1989)Google Scholar, firmly debunked this traditional interpretation, arguing that “the allegation that the British presence on the Mosquito Shore and in the Bay of Honduras was indicative of imperialistic designs on Central America implied an awareness, a continuity, and a proficiency on the part of the British government that the evidence does not seem to bear out” (16). Recently, however, Christopher Paetzold has argued that British policies were influenced by Britain's strategic designs on Central America. Paetzold, “British Participation.”

7. Sullivan, Paul, “John Carmichael: Life and Design on the Frontier in Central America,” Revista Mexicana del Caribe 4:10 (2000), 6–88 Google Scholar.

8. See for instance Clegern, Wayne, “British Honduras and the Pacification of Yucatan,” The Americas 18:3 (January 1962), 245–247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Reed, Nelson, The Caste War of Yucatán (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001), 127 Google Scholar.

9. Frederick Jackson Turner, The Significance of the Frontier in American History (London: Penguin Books, 2008).

10. Weber, David, The Spanish Frontier in North America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), 11 Google Scholar.

11. Adelman, Jeremy and Aron, Stephen, “From Borderlands to Borders: Empires, Nation-States, and the Peoples in Between in North American History,” American Historical Review 104:3 (June 1999): 815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. Ibid., 814–841.

13. Chasteen, John Charles, Heroes on Horseback: A Life and Times of the Last Gaucho Caudillos, Diálogos Series (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Clementi, Hebe, “National Identity and the Frontier,” in Where Cultures Meet: Frontiers in Latin American History, Weber, David and Rausch, Jane M., eds. (Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009)Google Scholar; Slatta, Richard, “The Gaucho in Argentina's Quest for National Identity,” in Where Cultures Meet, Weber and Rausch, eds. (2009), 151–164 Google Scholar; Alonso, Ana María, Thread of Blood: Colonialism, Revolution, and Gender on Mexico's Northern Frontier (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

14. Vélez, Luz de Carmen Vallarta, Los payosbispenses: identidad, población y cultura en la frontera México-Belice (Chetumal: Universidad de Quintana Roo, 2001), 430 Google Scholar.

15. In particular, see Restall, Matthew, “Crossing to Safety? Frontier Flight in Eighteenth Century Belize and Yucatan,” Hispanic American Historical Review 94:3 (August 2014), 381–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Lentz, Mark, “Black Belizeans and Fugitive Mayas: Interracial Encounters on the Edge of Empire, 1750–1803,” The Americas 70:4 (April 2014), 645–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Matthew Restall, “Crossing to Safety?” 413.

17. Williams, Caroline, “Living Between Empires: Diplomacy and Politics in the Late Eighteenth Century Mosquitia, The Americas 70:2 (October 2013), 237–268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gabbert, Wolfgang, “God Save the King of the Mosquito Nation: Indigenous Leaders on the Fringe of the Spanish Empire, Ethnohistory 63:1 (January 2016), 71–93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rogers, Nicholas, “Caribbean Borderland: Empire, Ethnicity and the Exotic on the Mosquito Coast,” Eighteenth Century Life 26:3 (Fall 2002), 117–138 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

18. Bolland, O. Nigel, The Formation of a Colonial Society: Belize from Conquest to Crown Colony (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977), 49 Google Scholar.

19. Bolland, O. Nigel, Colonialism and Resistance in Belize: Essays in Historical Sociology (Belize: Cubola, 2009), 21 Google Scholar.

20. Ibid.

21. Ibid., 31.

22. Johnson, Melissa, “The Making of Race and Place in Nineteenth-Century British Honduras,” Environmental History 8:4 (October 2003), 601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23. Bolland, Formation, 37.

24. Curry, Herbert, “British Honduras: From Public Meeting to Crown Colony,” The Americas 13:1 (July 1956), 39 Google Scholar.

25. Ibid., 40.

26. Bolland, Formation, 175.

27. Karen Judd, “Elite Reproduction and Ethnic Identity in Belize” (PhD diss., City University of New York: Proquest Dissertations and Theses Database, 1992), 57.

28. Ibid., 58.

29. Bolland, Formation, 183.

30. González, Martha Herminia Villalobos, El Bosque Sitiado, Map 6 (Mexico: CIESAS, 2006), 77 Google Scholar.

31. Robins, Nicholas A., Native Insurgencies and the Genocidal Impulse in the Americas (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005), 160 Google Scholar.

32. I use the term Hispanic in this article to refer to Yucatecan creoles and mestizos.

33. On the borders of Belize and Mexico, Maya of southern and eastern Yucatán engaged in hostilities starting in 1847. After initial defeats, the rebels regrouped in 1850 and founded their capital in the forests of Quintana Roo, in what came to be called Chan Santa Cruz. Thereafter the Cruzo.b Maya became the most potent enemies of the Mexican state. The southern Maya (bordering and within the state of Campeche) had by late 1850 become pacíficos, making peace with the Mexican government.

34. Secretary of the Governor of Yucatan to the Superintendent, December 1847, Burdon, Sir John Alder, Archives of British Honduras, Vol. 3 (London: Sifton, Piraed and Co., 1935)Google Scholar.

35. Before coming to Belize, Charles St. John Fancourt (1804–1875) served as a Member of Parliament for Barnstaple, England, from 1832–1837. He also served as the private secretary to the Duke of Cumberland after the duke became Hanover's king following the death of William IV. According to David Latané, “Fancourt, though presumably a Tory, moved in dandy circles.” Latané, David, William Maginn and the British Press: A Critical Biography (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2016), 232 note 10.)Google Scholar. Fancourt also authored a history of Yucatán in 1854. Fancourt, Charles, The History of Yucatan from its Discovery to the Close of the Seventeenth Century (London: John Murray, 1854)Google Scholar.

36. Belmopan Archives and Records Services (hereafter, BARS), Superintendent to C. O. Garrison, March 4, 1848, R.22b, 253–254.

37. González, El Bosque, 29.

38. Ibid., 34.

39. Bolland, Formation, 31.

40. González, El Bosque, 29.

41. BARS, Superintendent to Governor of Jamaica, April 27, 1848, R.25, 358–360.

42. Ibid.

43. BARS, Superintendent Fancourt to Governor of Jamaica, May 9, 1848, R.25, 362–364.

44. Ibid.

45. BARS, Superintendent to Governor of Jamaica, April 27, 1848, R.25, 358–360.

46. BARS, Governor of Yucatan to Superintendent Fancourt, December ? 1847, R.27, 445–448.

47. Ibid.

48. BARS, Superintendent Fancourt to Governor of Jamaica, May 9, 1848, R.25, 362–364.

49. BARS, Superintendent Fancourt to Governor of Jamaica, June 7, 1848, R.25, 381.

50. Ibid.

51. BARS, Superintendent to H. B. M. Consul, Mexico, November 10, 1849, R.32b, 36–37.

52. Hamnett, Brian, Concise History of Mexico (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53. Ibid.

54. Ibid.

55. Rugeley, Terry, Rebellion Now and Forever: Mayas, Hispanics, and Caste War Violence in Yucatán, 1800–1880 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009), 55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56. Richmond, Douglas, Conflict and Carnage in Yucatán: Liberals, the Second Empire and Maya Revolutionaries, 1855–1876 (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2015), 23–24 Google Scholar.

57. Ibid., 24.

58. BARS, Superintendent Fancourt to Governor of Jamaica, June 7, 1848, R.25, 377–378.

59. Ibid.

60. Ibid.

61. BARS, Superintendent to Authorities, Bacalar, July 12, 1848, R.22b, 307–308.

62. BARS, Fancourt to Charles Grey, July 8, 1848, R.25, 407–408. Angel Cal who has also examined Anglo-Maya relations finds Fancourt to be apprehensive of the Maya threat from the very beginning. My own interpretation is different: I find a change over time, with Fancourt initially (after receiving intelligence from Cox) regarding the Mayas as less of a threat but by July 1848 clearly becoming worried about possible repercussions of the Caste War in Belize. See Cal, Angel, Anglo-Maya Contact in Northern Belize: A Study of British policy toward the Maya during the Caste War of Yucatán, 1847–1872 (Master's thesis: University of Calgary, 1983)Google Scholar.

63. BARS, Fancourt to Charles Grey, July 8, 1848, R.25, 407–408.

64. Ibid.

65. BARS, Superintendent to Authorities, Bacalar, July 12, 1848, R.22b, 307–308.

66. BARS, Fancourt to Charles Grey, August 10, 1848, R.25, 422.

67. BARS, Governor of Jamaica to Superintendent Fancourt, May 21, 1848, R.30, 40–44.

68. Ibid.

69. Ibid.

70. BARS, Superintendent to Authorities, Bacalar, June 24, 1848, R.22b, 295–296.

71. Ibid.

72. BARS, Superintendent to Governor of Jamaica, April 10, 1848, R.25, 344.

73. BARS, T. Rhys to Superintendent, April 4, 1848, R.29, 68.

74. BARS, B. H. M. Consul, Mexico, to Superintendent, forwarding correspondence from the Mexican government, September 15, 1848, R.29, 100.

75. BARS, Percy Doyle to Superintendent Fancourt, March 21, 1849, R.29, 235.

76. BARS, Percy Doyle to the Mexican government, April 18, 1849, R.29, 279.

77. BARS, T. Rhys to Superintendent, December 28, 1848, R.29, 174.

78. Ibid.

79. Ibid.

80. BARS, Superintendent to Dr. Rhys, December 28, 1848, R.22b, 383–384.

81. Ibid.

82. BARS, Superintendent to Governor of Jamaica, January 11, 1849, R 25, 473–477.

83. Dumond, Don, The Machete and the Cross (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997), 148 Google Scholar.

84. BARS, Superintendent to Comandante, Bacalar, January 5, 1849, R.22b, 398–399.

85. BARS, Superintendent to Governor of Jamaica, January 11, 1849, R.25, 473–477.

86. Ibid.

87. Ibid.

88. Superintendent to Commandant of Militia, Bacalar in Burdon, Archives of British Honduras, February 24, 1848.

89. BARS, Superintendent To Governor of Jamaica, January 11, 1849, R.25, 473–477.

90. Ibid.

91. Ibid.

92. Vito Pacheco had what can be termed a checkered career. Before entering the political scene in Yucatán as a lieutenant in the federalist Imán revolt of 1839, he had been involved in smuggling as well as a murder. His political opponents accused him of joining the revolt to “escape punishment for his ”horrendous crimes.” Terry Rugeley, Yucatán's Maya Peasantry, 120–121. Rugeley calls him an “assassin, bandit, and poster child of pueblo anticlericalism, who had an uncanny knack for organizing peasant guerrillas.” Rugeley, Rebellion Now and Forever, 50.

93. BARS, Magistrate, Punta Consejo, to Superintendent, January 22, 1849, R.29, 201–202.

94. BARS, Superintendent to Commandant, Bacalar, May 21, 1849, R.22b, 451–452.

95. Dumond, The Machete. 153.

96. BARS, Fancourt to Chief Magistrate, Bacalar, May 9, 1848, R.30, 181.

97. Ibid.

98. BARS, Governor of Jamaica to Superintendent, forwarding instructions for the return of the reinforcements to the garrison to Jamaica, and related papers, August 9, 1849, R.30, 169–172, 216–219, 257–259.

99. BARS, Governor of Mérida to Superintendent, forwarding correspondence from Mexico and complaining that the British continue to supply the Indians with munitions, September 12, 1849, R.33, 89–93,127–138, 183–184, 189–194.

100. Ibid. October 3, 1849.

101. Ibid.

102. Ibid., November 3, 1849.

103. Ibid., November 4, 1849.

104. BARS, Letter from John C. Fancourt to Jacinto Pat, Chief, September 17, 1849, II, 21–24.

105. BARS, Superintendent to H. B. M. Consul, Mexico, November 10, 1849, R.32b, 36–37.

106. Ibid.

107. Ibid.

108. Dumond, The Machete, 174.

109. Ibid., The Machete, 456 note 55.

110. BARS, Superintendent to Commandant, Bacalar, May 6, 1850, R.32b, 52–55.

111. BARS, Fancourt to Captain Meehan, July 23, 1850, R.32b, 72.

112. Bolland, Formation, 120.

113. Ibid., 122.

114. September 1851, Burdon, Archives of British Honduras.

115. BARS, Superintendent to H. B. M. Consul, Mexico, December 10, 1849, R.32b, 39–41.

116. Quoted in Dumond, The Machete, 174.

117. BARS, Statement of Mr. George Fantesie, May 4, 1850, R.33, 684.

118. Nicholas Robins, Native Insurgencies, 160.