Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-h2mp8 Total loading time: 0.264 Render date: 2021-08-05T08:43:57.688Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Gut immunity: its development and reasons and opportunities for modulation in monogastric production animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2018

Leon J. Broom
Affiliation:
Gut Health Consultancy, Exeter, Devon, UK Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Michael H. Kogut
Affiliation:
Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, College Station, TX 77845, USA
Corresponding

Abstract

The intestine performs the critical roles of nutrient acquisition, tolerance of innocuous and beneficial microorganisms, while retaining the ability to respond appropriately to undesirable microbes or microbial products and preventing their translocation to more sterile body compartments. Various components contribute to antimicrobial defenses in the intestine. The mucus layer(s), antimicrobial peptides and IgA provide the first line of defense, and seek to trap and facilitate the removal of invading microbes. If breached, invading microbes next encounter a single layer of epithelial cells and, below this, the lamina propria with its associated immune cells. The gut immune system has developmental stages, and studies from different species demonstrate that innate capability develops earlier than acquired. In addition, various factors may influence the developmental process; for example, the composition and activity of the gut microbiota, antimicrobials, maternally derived antibodies, host genetics, and various stressors (e.g. feed deprivation). Therefore, it is clear that particularly younger (meat-producing) animals are reliant on innate immune responses (as well as passive immunity) for a considerable period of their productive life, and thus focusing on modulating appropriate innate responses should be an intervention priority. The gut microbiota is probably the most influential factor for immune development and capability. Interventions (e.g. probiotics, prebiotics, antibodies, etc.) that appropriately modulate the composition or activity of the intestinal microbiota can play an important role in shaping the desired functionality of the innate (and acquired) response. In addition, innate immune mediators, such as toll-like receptor agonists, cytokines, etc., may provide more specific ways to suitably modulate the response. A better understanding of mucosal immunology, signaling pathways, and processes, etc., will provide even more precise methods in the future to boost innate immune capability and minimize any associated (e.g. nutrient) costs. This will provide the livestock industry with more effective options to promote robust and efficient productivity.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assmann, N and Finlay, DK (2016). Metabolic regulation of immune responses; therapeutic opportunities. Journal of Clinical Investigation 126: 20312039.Google ScholarPubMed
Bar-Shira, E and Friedman, A (2006). Development and adaptations of innate immunity in the gastrointestinal tract of the newly hatched chick. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 30: 930941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Shira, E, Sklan, D and Friedman, A (2003). Establishment of immune competence in the avian GALT during the immediate post-hatch period. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 27: 147157.Google ScholarPubMed
Bar-Shira, E, Sklan, D and Friedman, A (2005). Impaired immune responses in broiler hatchling hindgut following delayed access to feed. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 105: 3345.Google Scholar
Broom, LJ (2017). The sub-inhibitory theory for antibiotic growth promoters. Poultry Science 96: 31043108.Google ScholarPubMed
Broom, LJ and Kogut, MH (2017). Inflammation: friend or foe for animal production? Poultry Science 96: pex314.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S and O'Neill, LAJ (2007). How important are toll-like receptors for antimicrobial responses? Cellular Microbiology 9: 18911901.Google ScholarPubMed
Castanon, JIR (2007). History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poultry Science 86: 24662471.Google ScholarPubMed
Gadde, U, Kim, WH, Oh, ST and Lillehoj, HS (2017). Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. Animal Health Research Reviews 18: 2645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garg, D, Nowis, D, Golab, J, Vandenabeele, P, Krysko, DV and Agostinis, P (2010). Immunogenic cell death, DAMPs and anticancer therapeutics: an emerging amalgamation. Bioenergetics 1805: 5371.Google ScholarPubMed
Gupta, SK, Deb, R, Dey, S and Chellappa, MM (2014). Toll-like receptor-based adjuvants: enhancing the immune response to vaccines against infectious diseases of chicken. Expert Review of Vaccines 13: 909925.Google ScholarPubMed
He, H, MacKinnon, KM, Genovese, KJ and Kogut, MH (2011). Cpg oligodeoxynucleotide and double-stranded RNA synergize to enhance nitric oxide production and mRNA expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in chicken monocytes. Innate Immunity 17: 137144.Google ScholarPubMed
Hodgins, DC, Kang, SY, deArriba, L, Parreño, V, Ward, LA, Yuan, L, To, T and Saif, LJ (1999). Effects of maternal antibodies on protection and development of antibody responses to human rotavirus in gnotobiotic pigs. Journal of Virology 73: 186197.Google ScholarPubMed
Honda, K and Littman, DR (2012). The microbiome in infectious disease and inflammation. Annual Review of Immunology 30: 759795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, LV, Littman, DR and Macpherson, AJ (2012). Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 336: 12681273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inman, CF, Haverson, K, Konstantinov, SR, Jones, PH, Harris, C, Smidt, H, Miller, B, Bailey, M and Stokes, C (2010). Rearing environment affects development of the immune system in neonates. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 160: 431439.Google ScholarPubMed
Janeway, CA and Medzhitov, R (2002). Innate immune recognition. Annual Reviews of Immunology 20: 197216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagnoff, MF (1993). Immunology of the intestinal tract. Gastroenterology 105: 12751280.Google ScholarPubMed
Karpala, AJ, Stewart, C, McKay, J, Lowenthal, JW and Bean, AG (2011). Characterization of chicken Mda5 activity: regulation of IFN- β in the absence of RIG-I functionality. The Journal of Immunology 186: 53975405.Google ScholarPubMed
Kawai, T and Akira, S (2009). The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition. International Immunology 21: 317337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keestra, AM, de Zoete, MR, Bouwman, LI, Vaezirad, MM and van Putten, JP (2013). Unique features of chicken toll-like receptors. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 41: 316323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoruts, A, Mondino, A, Pape, KA, Reiner, SL and Jenkins, MK (1998). A natural immunological adjuvant enhances T cell clonal expansion through a CD28-dependent, interleukin (IL)-2-independent mechanism. Journal of Experimental Medicine 187: 225236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogut, MH (2000). Cytokines and prevention of infectious diseases in poultry: a review. Avian Pathology 29: 395404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogut, MH (2017). Issues and consequences of using nutrition to modulate the avian immune response. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 26: 605612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, MH, Yin, X, Yuan, J and Broom, LJ (2017). Gut health in poultry. CAB Reviews 12: 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krysko, DV, Agostinis, P, Krysko, O, Garg, AD, Bachert, C, Lambrecht, BN and Vandenabeele, P (2011). Emerging role of damage-associated molecular patterns derived from mitochondria in inflammation. Trends in Immunology 32: 157164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lackey, DE and Olefsky, JM (2016). Regulation of metabolism by the innate immune system. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 12: 1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, A, Wieland, WH, Kruijt, L, Jansma, A, Straetemans, T, Schots, A, den Hartog, G and Parmentier, HK (2010). Successive immunoglobulin and cytokine expression in the small intestine of juvenile chicken. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 34: 12541262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bourgot, C, Ferret-Bernard, S, Le Normand, L, Savary, G, Menendez-Aparicio, E, Blat, S, Appert-Bossard, E, Respondek, F and Le Huerou-Luron, I (2014). Maternal short-chain fructooligosaccharide supplementation influences intestinal immune system maturation in piglets. PLoS ONE 9: e107508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, MS and Kim, YJ (2007). Signalling pathways downstream of pattern-recognition receptors and their cross talk. Annual Review of Biochemistry 76: 447480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, KW, Lillehoj, HS, Lee, SH, Jang, SI, Park, MS, Bautista, DA, Ritter, GD, Hong, YH, Siragusa, GR and Lillehoj, EP (2012). Effect of dietary antimicrobials on immune status in broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 25: 382392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lian, L, Ciraci, C, Chang, G, Hu, J and Lamont, SJ (2012). NLRC5 knockdown in chicken macrophages alters response to LPS and poly (I:C) stimulation. BMC Veterinary Research 8: 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madej, JP and Bednarczyk, M (2016). Effect of in ovo-delivered prebiotics and synbiotics on the morphology and specific immune cell composition in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Poultry Science 95: 1929.Google ScholarPubMed
Magor, KE, Miranzo Navarro, D, Barber, MR, Petkau, K, Fleming-Canepa, X, Blyth, GA and Blaine, AH (2013). Defense genes missing from the flight division. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 41: 377388.Google ScholarPubMed
Majidi-Mosleh, A, Sadeghi, AA, Mousavi, SN, Chamani, M and Zarei, A (2017). Ileal MUC2 gene expression and microbial population, but not growth performance and immune response, are influenced by in ovo injection of probiotics in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 58: 4045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGettrick, AF and O'Neill, LAJ (2013). How metabolism generates signals during innate immunity and inflammation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 288: 2289322898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLamb, BL, Gibson, AJ, Overman, EL, Stahl, C and Moeser, AJ (2013). Early weaning stress in pigs impairs innate mucosal immune responses to enterotoxigenic E. coli challenge and exacerbates intestinal injury and clinical disease. PLoS ONE 8: e59838.Google ScholarPubMed
Niewold, TA (2007). The nonantibiotic anti-inflammatory effect of antimicrobial growth promoters, the real mode of action? A hypothesis. Poultry Science 86: 605609.Google ScholarPubMed
Nurmi, E and Rantala, M (1973). New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 241: 210211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owusu-Asiedu, A, Nyachoti, CM and Marquardt, RR (2003). Response of early-weaned pigs to an enterotoxigenic Esherichia coli (K88) challenge when fed diets containing spray-dried porcine plasma or pea protein isolate plus egg yolk antibody, zinc oxide, fumaric acid or antibiotic. Journal of Animal Science 81: 17901798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pender, CM, Kim, S, Potter, TD, Ritzi, MM, Young, M and Dalloul, RA (2017). In ovo supplementation of probiotics and its effects on performance and immune-related gene expression in broiler chicks. Poultry Science 96: 10521062.Google ScholarPubMed
Peng, ZX, Wang, AR, Xie, LQ, Song, WP, Wang, J, Yin, Z, Zhou, DS and Li, FQ (2016). Use of recombinant porcine beta-defensin 2 as a medicated feed additive for weaned piglets. Scientific Reports 6: 26790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pourabedin, M and Zhao, X (2015). Prebiotics and gut microbiota in chickens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 362: fnv122.Google ScholarPubMed
Quinteiro-Filho, WM, Rodrigues, MV, Ribeiro, A, Ferraz-de-Paula, V, Pinheiro, ML, Sa, LRM, Ferreira, AJP and Palermo-Neto, J (2012). Acute heat stress impairs performance parameters and induces mild intestinal enteritis in broiler chickens: role of acute hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation. Journal of Animal Science 90: 19861994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russler-Germain, EV, Rengarajan, S and Hsieh, CS (2017). Antigen-specific regulatory T-cell responses to intestinal microbiota. Mucosal Immunology 10: 13751386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandell, MI, Tobler, M and Hasselquist, D (2009). Yolk androgens and the development of avian immunity: an experiment in jackdaws (Corvus monedula). The Journal of Experimental Biology 212: 815822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokker, D, Veninga, G, Vastenhouw, SA, Bossers, A, de Bree, FM, Kaal-Lansbergen, LMTE, Rebel, JMJ and Smits, MA (2015). Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines. BMC Genomics 16: 418.Google ScholarPubMed
St Paul, M, Brisbin, JT, Abdul-Careem, MF and Sharif, S (2013). Immunostimulatory properties of Toll-like receptor ligands in chickens. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 152: 191199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterzl, J, Rejnek, J and Trávnícek, J (1966). Impermeability of pig placenta for antibodies. Folia Microbiologica 11: 710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokes, CR (2017). The development and role of microbial host interactions in gut mucosal immune development. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 8: 12.Google ScholarPubMed
Stokes, CR, Bailey, M, Haverson, K, Harris, C, Jones, P, Inman, C, Pie, S, Oswald, IP, Williamson, BA, Akkermans, ADL, Sowa, E, Rothkotter, HJ and Miller, BG (2004). Postnatal development of intestinal immune system in piglets: implications for the process of weaning. Animal Research 53: 325334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaggerty, CL, Pevzner, IY and Kogut, MH (2014). Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators yields chickens with increased resistance against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Poultry Science 93: 535544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swaggerty, CL, Pevzner, IY and Kogut, MH (2015). Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators produces chickens more resistant to Eimeria tenella. Poultry Science 94: 3742.Google ScholarPubMed
Swaggerty, CL, McReynolds, JL, Byrd, JA, Pevzner, IY, Duke, SE, Genovese, KJ, He, H and Kogut, MH (2016). Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators produces chickens more resistant to Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis. Poultry Science 95: 370374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takeuchi, O and Akira, S (2010). Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140: 805820.Google ScholarPubMed
Tannahill, GM, Curtis, AM, Adamik, J, Palsson-McDermott, EM, McGettrick, AF, Goel, G, Frezza, C, Bernard, NJ, Kelly, B, Foley, NH, Zheng, L, Gardet, A, Tong, Z, Jany, SS, Corr, SC, Haneklaus, M, Caffrey, BE, Pierce, K, Walmsley, S, Beasley, FC, Cummins, E, Nizet, V, Whyte, M, Taylor, CT, Lin, H, Masters, SL, Gottlieb, E, Kelly, VP, Clish, C, Auron, PE, Xavier, RJ, O'Neill, LA (2013). Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature 496: 238242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umar, S, Arif, M, Shah, MAA, Munir, MT, Yaqoob, M, Ahmed, S, Khan, MI, Younus, M and Shahzad, M (2015). Application of avian cytokines as immuno-modulating agents. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 71: 643653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega-Lopez, MA, Bailey, M, Telemo, E and Stokes, CR (1995). Effect of early weaning on the development of immune cells in the pig small-intestine. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 44: 319327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Gut immunity: its development and reasons and opportunities for modulation in monogastric production animals
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Gut immunity: its development and reasons and opportunities for modulation in monogastric production animals
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Gut immunity: its development and reasons and opportunities for modulation in monogastric production animals
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *