Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:01:03.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case control study on environmental, nutritional and management-based risk factors for tail-biting in long-tailed pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2023

PA Kallio*
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, PB 57, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
AM Janczak
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Research Group, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Oslo, Norway
AE Valros
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, PB 57, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
SA Edwards
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
M Heinonen
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, PB 57, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: palvi.kallio@outlook.com

Abstract

A case control study with a questionnaire was carried out to compare feeding practices, diet composition, housing and management in 78 herds with or without a history of tail-biting in undocked pigs (Sus scrofa) in Finland. Tail-biting was measured as the mean annual prevalence score of tail-biting damage (TBD) for a farm. Logistic regression parameters were calculated separately for risk factors present in piglet (lactation), weaner, and finishing units. Risk factors found in piglet units for TBD were slatted floors and area of slats. In the weaner units, slatted floors, area of slats, use of whey or wheat in the diet, and use of purchased compound feeds were associated with a risk of TBD. In the finishing units, slatted floors, area of slats, increasing number of finisher pigs at the farm, absence of bedding, liquid feeding, several meals per day, specialised production type and a group size greater than nine pigs were found as risk factors for TBD. Increased farm size was connected to risk for TBD in the overall dataset. The nutritional risk factors seem to operate together with other risk factors, but with relatively lower odds. The risk factors of undocked herds in this study seem to be similar to the risk factors from earlier studies of docked pigs. This study provides information which can be used to refine decision-support tools for management of the potentially higher risk for tail-biting among long-tailed pigs, thus aiding compliance with EU law and enhancing pig welfare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2018 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, PD 2002 Missing Data. Sage Publications Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averos, X, Brossard, L, Dourmad, J-Y, de Greef, KH, Edge, HL, Edwards, SA and Meunier-Salaün, M-C 2010 A meta-analysis of the combined effect of housing and environmental enrichment characteris-tics on the behavior and performance of pigs. Applied Animal Behavior Science 127: 7385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, Breuer, K, O’Connell, NE, Sneddon, IA, Mercer, JT, Rance, KA, Sutcliffe, MEM and Edwards, SA 2005 Factors identifying pigs predisposed to tail biting. Animal Science 80: 307312. https://doi.org/10.1079/ASC40040307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, Walker, N and Sneddon, IA 1995 Effects of envi-ronmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Animal Welfare 4: 207220Google Scholar
Berrocoso, JD, Serrano, MP, Cámara, L, Rebollar, PG and Mateos, GG 2012 Influence of diet complexity on productive performance and nutrient digestibility of weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 171: 214222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.10.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolhuis, JE, van den Brand, H, Bartels, AC, Oostindjer, M, van den Borne, JJGC, Kemp, B and Gerrits, WJJ 2010 Effects of fermentable starch on behavior of growing pigs in barren or enriched housing. Applied Animal Behavior Science 123: 7786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botermans, AM and Svendsen, J 2000 Effect of feeding envi-ronment on performance, injuries and behaviour in growing-fin-ishing pigs: Group-based studies. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science 54(4): 237249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, MBM, Hulsegge, B, Keeling, L and Blokhuis, HJ 2004 Decision support system with semantic model to assess the risk of tail biting in pigs 1. Modelling. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87: 3144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, JEL, Burfoot, A, Docking, CM, Whittaker, X, Spoolder, HAM and Edwards, SA 2002 The effects of prior experience of straw and the level of straw provision on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76: 189202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00017-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D´Eath, RB, Arnott, G, Turner, SP, Jensen, T, Lahrmann, HP, Busch, ME, Niemi, JK, Lawrence, AB and Sandøe, P 2014 Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking? Animal 8(9): 14791497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001359Google ScholarPubMed
de Lange, CFM, Zhu, CHZ, Niven, S, Columbus, D and Woods, D 2006 Swine liquid feeding: nutritional considerations.27th Western Nutrition Conference. 19-20 September 2006, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Dupont, WD and Plummer, WD 1990 ‘Power and Sample Size Calculations: A Review and Computer Program’, Version 3.0.0043. Controlled Clinical Trials 11: 116128. internetbiostat.mc.vanderbilt.eduCrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFSA 2007 Scientific report on the risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking. The EFSA Journal 611: 198Google Scholar
European Commission 2013 Commission to issue guidelines on the welfare of pigs. Animal Health and Welfare (25 March 2013). Directorate general for health and consumers. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_con-sumer/dyna/enews/enews.cfm?al_id=1358Google Scholar
Finlex 2012 Valtioneuvoston asetus sikojen suojelusta 629/2012. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2012/20120629#Pidm2239312Google Scholar
Fraser, D 1987 Mineral-deficient diets and the pigs attraction to blood: implications for tail biting. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67: 909918. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas87-096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D, Bernon, DE and Ball, RO 1991 Enhanced attraction to blood by pigs with inadequate dietary-protein supplementation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71(3): 611619. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskin, MS, Thodberg, K and Jensen, HE 2015 Effects of tail docking and docking length on neuroanatomical changes in healed tail tips of pigs. Animal 9(4): 677681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002857CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hessel, EF, Wulbers-Mindermann, M, Berg, C, Van den Weghe, HFA and Algers, B 2006 Influence of increased feeding frequency on behavior and integument lesions in growing-finishing restricted-fed pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84: 15261534. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.8461526xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmgren, N and Lundeheim, N 2004 Risk factors for tail biting. Proceedings of the 18th IPVS Congress p 786. 27 June–1 July 2004, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Hunter, EJ, Jones, TA, Guise, HJ, Penny, RHC and Hoste, S 2001 The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices. The Veterinary Journal 161:7279. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jäger, F 2013 Das project ‘intakter ringelschwanz’ beim Schwein – stehen wir vor dem Durchbruch? Tieraerzliche Umschau 68: 311. [Title translation: The Project ’Intact curly tails’ in pigs - are we just before a breakthrough?]Google Scholar
Jericho, KWF and Church, TL 1972 Cannibalism in pigs. Canadian Veterinary Journal 13: 156159Google ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, J and Edwards, S 2002 An investigation into the effect of different protein and energy intakes on model tail chewing behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 77: 93104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00044-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moinard, C, Mendl, M, Nicol, CJ and Green, LE 2003 A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 333355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00276-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterhjelm, C, Peltoniemi, OAT, Heinonen, M, Hälli, O, Karhapää, M and Valros, A 2009 Experience of moder-ate bedding affects behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 4253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2009.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munsterhjelm, C, Simola, O, Keeling, L, Valros, A and Heinonen, M 2013 Health parameters in tail biters and bitten pigs in a case-control study. Animal 7(5): 814821. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, EK and Ingvartsen, KL 2000 Effect of cereal type, disin-tegration method and pelleting on stomach content, weight and ulcers and performance in growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 66: 271282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00165-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, JK, Sinisalo, A, Valros, A and Heinonen, M 2011 The timing and treatment of tail biting in fattening pigs. In: Hulgren J, Persson P, Nadeau E and Fogelberg F (eds) 24th NJF Congress on Food, Feed, Fuel and Fun: Nordic Light on Future Land Use and Rural Development. NJF Report 7 pp 5055. 14-16 June 2011, NJF, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Paul, ES, Moinard, C, Green, LE and Mendl, M 2007 Farmers´ attitudes to methods for controlling tail biting in pigs. Veterinary Record 160: 803805. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.160.23.803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, AO, Canibe, N, Hansen, ID and Aaslying, MD 2002 Fermented liquid feed for finishers: Pelleted feed, Volume 1. The National Committee for Pig Production: Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Rodenburg, TB and Koene, P 2007 The impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm ani-mals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 103: 205214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiterkamp, WA 1985 Het gedrag van mestvarkens in relatie tot huisvesting. PhD Thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands. [Title translation: The behaviour of fattening pigs in relation to housing]Google Scholar
Schmolke, SA, Li, YZ and Gonyou, HW 2003 Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81: 874878. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.814874xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholten, RHJ, van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Verstegen, MWA, den Hartog, LA, Schrama, JW and Vesseur, PC 1999 Fermented co-products and fermented compound diets for pigs: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 82: 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrøder-Petersen, DL and Simonsen, HB 2001 Tail biting in pigs. Veterinary Journal 162: 196210. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2001.0605CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sihvo, H-K, Simola, O, Munsterhjelm, C and Syrjä, P 2012 Systemic spread of infection in tail-bitten pigs. Journal of Comparative Pathology 146(1): 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2011.11.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulders, D, Hautekiet, V, Verbeke, G and Geers, R 2008 Tail and ear biting lesions in pigs: an epidemiological study. Animal Welfare 17: 6169Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA and Tucker, CB 2011 The long and short of it: A review of tail docking in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 179191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2011.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, NR, Main, DCJ, Mendl, M and Edwards, SA 2010 Tail-biting: A new perspective. The Veterinary Journal 186: 137147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, NR, Parker, RMA, Mendl, M, Edwards, SA and Main, DCJ 2012 Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies. The Veterinary Journal 194: 7783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temple, D, Courboulay, V, Velarde, A, Dalmau, A and Manteca, X 2012 The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems in France and Spain: assessment of health. Animal Welfare 21: 257271. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.2.257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J 2009 Feed-associated colitis of growing pigs and its inter-action with enteric infections. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 37(1): 19Google Scholar
Ursinus, WW, Van Reenen, CG, Kemp, B and Bolhuis, JE 2014 Tail biting behaviour and tail damage in pigs and the relation-ship with general behaviour: Predicting the inevitable? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 156: 2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.app-lanim.2014.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zonderland, JJ, Schepers, F, Bracke, MBM, den Hartog, LA, Kemp, B and Spoolder, HAM 2011 Characteristics of biter and vic-tim piglets apparent before a tail-biting outbreak. Animal 5(5): 767775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kallio et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 20.3 KB