Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Role of input self-sufficiency in the economic and environmental sustainability of specialised dairy farms

  • T. Lebacq (a1) (a2), P. V. Baret (a1) and D. Stilmant (a2)

Abstract

Increasing input self-sufficiency is often viewed as a target to improve sustainability of dairy farms. However, few studies have specifically analysed input self-sufficiency, by including several technical inputs and without only focussing on animal feeding, in order to explore its impact on farm sustainability. To address this gap, our work has three objectives as follows: (1) identifying the structural characteristics required by specialised dairy farms located in the grassland area to be self-sufficient; (2) analysing the relationships between input self-sufficiency, environmental and economic sustainability; and (3) studying how the farms react to a decrease in milk price according to their self-sufficiency degree. Based on farm accounting databases, we categorised 335 Walloon specialised conventional dairy farms into four classes according to their level of input self-sufficiency. To this end, we used as proxy the indicator of economic autonomy – that is, the ratio between costs of inputs related to animal production, crop production and energy use and the total gross product. Classes were then compared using multiple comparison tests and canonical discriminant analysis. A total of 30 organic farms – among which 63% had a high level of economic autonomy – were considered separately and compared with the most autonomous class. We showed that a high degree of economic autonomy is associated, in conventional farms, with a high proportion of permanent grassland in the agricultural area. The most autonomous farms used less input – especially animal feeding – for a same output level, and therefore combined good environmental and economic performances. Our results also underlined that, in a situation of decrease in milk price, the least autonomous farms had more latitude to decrease their input-related costs without decreasing milk production. Their incomes per work unit were, therefore, less impacted by falling prices, but remained lower than those of more autonomous farms. In such a situation, organic farms kept stable incomes, because of a slighter decrease in organic milk price. Our results pave the way to study the role of increasing input self-sufficiency in the transition of dairy farming systems towards sustainability. Further research is required to study a wide range of systems and agro-ecological contexts, as well as to consider the evolution of farm sustainability in the long term.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Association Wallonne de l’Elevage 2012. Perception survey of the dairy farmers and their consultants. Optimir Interreg IVB. Retrieved July 31, 2013, from http://www.optimir.eu
Astigarraga, L and Ingrand, S 2011. Production flexibility in extensive beef farming systems. Ecology and Society 16, 113. Retrieved September 5, 2012, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art7/
Bell, LW and Moore, AD 2012. Integrated crop-livestock systems in Australian agriculture: trends, drivers and implications. Agricultural Systems 111, 112.
Bernués, A, Ruiz, R, Olaizola, A, Villalba, D and Casasús, I 2011. Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: synergies and trade-offs. Livestock Science 139, 4457.
Bonny, S 2010. L’intensification écologique de l’agriculture: voie et défis. In Innovation and sustainable development in agriculture and food 2010 (ed. E Coudel, H Devautour, C Soulard and B Hubert), pp. 111. Cirad, Inra, Montpellier Supagro, Montpellier, France.
Botreau, R, Farruggia, A, Martin, B, Pomiès, D and Dumont, B 2014. Towards an agroecological assessment of dairy systems: proposal for a set of criteria suited to mountain farming. Animal 8, 13491360.
Cruz-Castillo, JG, Ganeshanandam, S, MacKay, BR, Lawes, GS, Lawoko, CRO and Woolley, DJ 1994. Applications of canonical discriminant analysis in horticultural research. HortScience 29, 11151119.
Darnhofer, I 2010. Strategies of family farms to strengthen their resilience. Environmental Policy and Governance 20, 212222.
Dumont, B, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Jouven, M, Thomas, M and Tichit, M 2013. Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century. Animal 7, 10281043.
European Commission 2012. Agriculture, farm accounting data network, sample selection. Retrieved April 6, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/methodology2_en.cfm
European Commission 2014. Agriculture and rural development, European milk market observatory. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/milk-market-observatory/index_en.htm
Guerci, M, Knudsen, MT, Bava, L, Zucali, M, Schönbach, P and Kristensen, T 2013. Parameters affecting the environmental impact of a range of dairy farming systems in Denmark, Germany and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production 54, 133141.
Hansen, B, Alrøe, HF and Kristensen, ES 2001. Approaches to assess the environmental impact of organic farming with particular regard to Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83, 1126.
Havet, A, Coquil, X, Fiorelli, JL, Gibon, A, Martel, G, Roche, B, Ryschawy, J, Schaller, N and Dedieu, B 2014. Review of livestock farmer adaptations to increase forages in crop rotations in western France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 190, 120127.
Kirschenmann, FL 2007. Potential for a new generation of biodiversity in agroecosystems of the future. Agronomy Journal 99, 373376.
Lebacq, T, Baret, PV and Stilmant, D 2013. Sustainability indicators for livestock farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33, 311327.
Lherm, M and Benoit, M 2003. L’autonomie de l’alimentation des systèmes ’élevage allaitant: évaluation et impacts économiques. Fourrages 176, 411424.
López-Ridaura, S, Masera, O and Astier, M 2002. Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. The MESMIS framework. Ecological Indicators 2, 135148.
MathWorks 2014. Quantile–quantile plot. Retrieved September 2, 2014, from http://www.mathworks.nl/help/stats/qqplot.html
Meul, M, Passel, SV, Fremaut, D and Haesaert, G 2012. Higher sustainability performance of intensive grazing versus zero-grazing dairy systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 629638.
Paccard, P, Capitain, M and Farruggia, A 2003. Autonomie alimentaire et bilans minéraux des élevages bovins laitiers selon les systèmes de production. Fourrages 174, 243257.
Raveau, A 2011. Critère d’autonomie et comportement des exploitations agricoles face au choc économique de 2007. Commissariat général au développement durable. Retrieved April 16, 2013, from http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/ED46.pdf
Ripoll-Bosch, R, Díez-Unquera, B, Ruiz, R, Villalba, D, Molina, E, Joy, M, Olaizola, A and Bernués, A 2012. An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agricultural Systems 105, 4656.
Ruiz, R, Santamaria, P, Arandia, A, Del Hierro, O, Icaran, C, Intxaurrandieta, JM, Lopez, E, Mangado, JM, Nafarrate, L and Pinto, M 2011. Incorporating social and environmental indicators in technical and economic advisory programmes in livestock farming. In Economic, social and environmental sustainability in sheep and goat production systems (ed. A Bernués, JP Boutonnet, I Casasús, M Chentouf, D Gabiña, M Joy, A López-Francos, P Morand-Fehr and F Pacheco), pp. 915. CIHEAM, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ryschawy, J, Choisis, N, Choisis, JP, Joannon, A and Gibon, A 2012. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming? Animal 6, 17221730.
Ten Napel, J, van der Veen, A, Oosting, S and Koerkamp, P 2011. A conceptual approach to design livestock production systems for robustness to enhance sustainability. Livestock Science 139, 150160.
Thomassen, MA, Dolman, MA, van Calker, KJ and de Boer, IJM 2009. Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms. Ecological Economics 68, 22782284.
Vanloqueren, G and Baret, PV 2008. Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural ‘lock-in’ case study. Ecological Economics 66, 436446.
Veysset, P, Lherm, M, Bébin, D and Roulenc, M 2014. Mixed crop-livestock farming systems: a sustainable way to produce beef? Commercial farms results, questions and perspectives. Animal 8, 12181228.
Vilain, L 2008. La méthode IDEA: indicateurs de durabilité des exploitations agricoles. Educagri Editions, Dijon, France.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Lebacq Supplementary Material
Tables S1-S5

 Word (111 KB)
111 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed