Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:41:31.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Theories of the Effects of Language Education Programs: An Empirical Evaluation of Bilingual and English-Only Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2017

Jeff MacSwan ,
Marilyn S. Thompson ,
Kellie Rolstad ,
Kara McAlister  and
Gerda Lobo
Jeff MacSwan
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Marilyn S. Thompson
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Kellie Rolstad
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Kara McAlister
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Gerda Lobo
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We empirically evaluated three theoretical models—the threshold hypothesis, transfer theory, and time-on-task theory—for educating English language learners (ELLs), with a focus on the role of language factors in explaining achievement differences among ELLs. Participants were 196 sixth graders with Spanish language backgrounds who started learning English in kindergarten and then were continuously enrolled in a U.S. school. Structural equation modeling was used to estimate the extent to which Spanish and English language and literacy—skills that are emphasized differentially in competing theories for educating ELLs—predict academic achievement assessed in English. Results indicated that Spanish literacy, over and above English language proficiency, was substantially predictive of academic achievement, consistent with the transfer theory. This model was a more focused version of the threshold hypothesis, in that the weaker predictor of Spanish oral language proficiency was excluded. Time-on task theory was not supported.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 37 , September 2017 , pp. 218 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Educating language-minority children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baker, C., & Wright, W. (2017). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (6th ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Baker, K., & de Kanter, A. A. (1981). Effectiveness of bilingual education: A review of the literature (Final Draft Report). Washington, DC: Department of Education Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning and assessment (pp. 23–48). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Commins, N., & Miramontes, O. (1989). Perceived and actual linguistic competence: A descriptive study of four low-achieving Hispanic bilingual students. American Educational Research Journal, 26 (4), 443–472.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (3), 402–423.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (2004). Educating English learners: Language diversity in the classroom (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Bilingual Education Services.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (2008). Advocating for English learners. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1976). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive growth: A synthesis of research findings and explanatory hypotheses. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 9, 1–43.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 221–251.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework. Sacramento, CA: Office of Bilingual Bicultural Education, California State Department of Education.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1994). Semilingualism. In Asher, R.R. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 3812–3814). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2008). Teaching for transfer: Challenging the two solitudes assumption in bilingual education. In Cummins, J. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 5. Bilingual education (2nd ed., pp. 65–75). Boston, MA: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2017). Teaching for transfer in multilingual educational contexts. In Garcia, O. & Lin, A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 5. Bilingual education (3rd ed., pp. 103–115). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
Curtiss, C. (2013). Revisiting modularity: Using language as a window to the mind. In Piatelli-Palmarini, M. & Berwick, R. C. (Eds.), Rich languages from poor inputs (pp. 68–90). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S., MacSwan, J., Schaeffer, J., Kural, M., & Sano, T. (2004). GCS: A grammatical coding system for natural language data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34 (3), 459–480.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C. (2006). With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in language and education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edelsky, C., Hudelson, S., Flores, B., Barkin, F., Altweger, J., & Jilbert, K. (1983). Semilingualism and language deficit. Applied Linguistics, 4, 1–22.Google Scholar
Faltis, C. (1989). Code-switching and bilingual schooling: An examination of Jacobson's new concurrent approach. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 10 (2), 117–127.Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R., & King, A. P. (2009). Chapter 13: The modularity of learning. In Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444310498.ch13Google Scholar
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Basil/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of non-native speech. Language Learning, 34 (1), 65–89.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W. M., & Christian, D. (Eds.). (2006). Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. P. (1998). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bilingual education. Claremont, CA: Thomas Rivera Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1985). The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker-hearer. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6 (6), 467–477.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K., & D'Andrea, D. (1992). Some properties of bilingual maintenance and loss in Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 72–99.Google Scholar
Hansegård, N. E. (1968). Tvåspråkighet eller halvspråkighet? Stockholm: Aldus series 253.Google Scholar
Jacobson, R. (1978). Code-switching in south Texas: Sociolinguistic considerations and pedagogical applications. Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest, 3, 20–32.Google Scholar
Jacobson, R. (1990). Allocating two languages as a key feature of bilingual methodology. In Jacobson, R. & Faltis, C. (Eds.), Language distribution issues in bilingual schooling (pp. 3–17). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kena, G., Hussar, W., McFarland, J., de Brey, C., Musu-Gillette, L., Wang, X., . . . Dunlop Velez, E. (2016). The condition of education 2016 (NCES 2016–144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1996). Under attack: The case against bilingual education. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.Google Scholar
Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974).Google Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2000). The threshold hypothesis, semilingualism, and other contributions to a deficit view of linguistic minorities. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22 (1), 3–45.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2017). A multilingual perspective on translanguaging. American Educational Research Journal, 54 (1), 167–201. doi:10.3102/0002831216683935Google Scholar
MacSwan, J., & Pray, L. (2005). Learning English bilingually: Age of onset of exposure and rate of acquisition of English among children in a bilingual education program. Bilingual Research Journal, 29 (3), 687–712.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2003). Linguistic diversity, schooling, and social class: Rethinking our conception of language proficiency in language minority education. In Paulston, C. B. & Tucker, R. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: The essential readings (pp. 329–340). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2005). Modularity and the facilitation effect: Psychological mechanisms of transfer in bilingual students. Hispanic Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 27 (2), 224– 243.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2006). How language tests mislead us about children's abilities: Implications for special education placements. Teachers College Record, 108 (11), 2304–2328.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2010). The role of language in theories of academic failure for linguistic minorities. In Petrovic, J. (Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice, and controversy (pp. 173–195). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Martin-Jones, M., & Romaine, S. (1986). Semilingualism: A half-baked theory of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 7 (1), 26–38.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York, NY: Puffin.Google Scholar
McField, G. P., & McField, D. R. (2014). The consistent outcome of bilingual education programs: A meta-analysis of meta-analyses. In McField, G. P. (Ed.), The miseducation of English learners (pp. 267–298). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. M., & Fienberg, S. E. (Eds.). (1992). Assessing evaluation studies: The case of bilingual education strategies. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milk, R. (1986). The issue of language separation in bilingual methodology. In García, E. & Flores, B. (Eds.), Language and literacy research in bilingual education (pp. 67–86). Tempe, AZ: Center for Bilingual Education, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Paulston, C. B. (1983). Swedish research and debate about bilingualism. Stockholm, Sweden: National Swedish Board of Education.Google Scholar
Petrovic, J. E., & Olmstead, S. (2001). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire, by J. Cummins [Book review]. Bilingual Research Journal, 25 (3), 405–410.Google Scholar
Porter, R. P. (1990). Forked tongue. The politics of bilingual education. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Reljić, G., Ferring, D., & Martin, R. (2015). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bilingual programs in Europe. Review of Educational Research, 85 (1), 92–128.Google Scholar
Ringbom, H. (1962). Tvåspråkighet som forskningsobjekt. Finsk Tidskrift, 6.Google Scholar
Rolstad, K. (2005). Rethinking academic language in second language instruction. In Cohen, J., McAlister, K., Rolstad, K., & MacSwan, J. (Eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 1993–1999). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Rolstad, K. (2015). Second language instructional competence. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1057101Google Scholar
Rolstad, K., & MacSwan, J. (2008). BICS/CALP: Theory and critique. In Gonzalez, J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of bilingual education (pp. 62–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rolstad, K., Mahoney, K., & Glass, G. V. (2005). The big picture: A meta-analysis of program effectiveness research on English language learners. Educational Policy, 19, 572–594.Google Scholar
Rossell, C. H., & Baker, K. (1996). The educational effectiveness of bilingual education. Research in the Teaching of English, 30 (1), 7–74.Google Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1995). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals R – Third Edition (CELF R). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1981). Bilingualism or not? The education of minorities. (Malmberg, L. & Crane, D., Trans.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Slavin, R., & Cheung, A. (2005). A synthesis of research of reading instruction for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2), 247–284.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. S., DiCerbo, K., Mahoney, K. S., & MacSwan, J. (2002). ¿Éxito en California? A validity critique of language program evaluations and analysis of English learner test scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (7). doi:10.14507/epaa.v10n7.2002Google Scholar
Toukomaa, P., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1977). The intensive teaching of the mother tongue to migrant children at pre-school age (Department of Sociology and Social Psychology Research Report No. 26). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
United States Commission on Civil Rights. (1975). A better chance to learn: Bilingual bicultural education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2012). Spell-out and the minimalist program. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valadez, C., MacSwan, J., & Martínez, C. (2000). Toward a new view of low-achieving bilinguals: A study of linguistic competence in designated “semilinguals.” Bilingual Review, 25 (3), 238–248.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2005). Literacy and language diversity in the United States (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G., & Rolstad, K.. (2014). The common core state standards and the great divide. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8 (1), 38–55.Google Scholar
Willig, A. C. (1985). A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research, 55 (3), 269–318.Google Scholar
Wong Fillmore, L., & Valadez, C. (1986). Teaching bilingual learners. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. (1991). Woodcock language proficiency battery (revised). Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar