Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:11:27.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics, Power, and the Divine: The Rex Sacrorum and the Transition from Monarchy to Republic at Rome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Fay Glinister
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether the result of internal revolution or external factors, in the late sixth century BC Rome underwent regime change. A king, or at least a sole ruler of some sort, was replaced by a governmental system in which power was distributed amongst a wider aristocratic group. Just what that elite group comprised at that point in time remains open to question, and the institutional reality is certainly more complicated than the simple shift from monarchy to consulship portrayed in the later literary sources;1 but as part of that change, according to Roman tradition, a priesthood was instituted to perform the deposed king’s sacred duties. This priesthood provides us with an opportunity to reappraise the role of religion in the development of the Roman state, and a useful locus from which to assess changes in religious and political power in the transition from monarchy to Republic at Rome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 51: Thematic Issue: Politics and Power in Early Rome 509-264 BC , 2017 , pp. 59 - 76
Copyright
© The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

E.g. Ov. Fast. 2.851-2: Tarquinius cum prole fugit, capit annua consul iura (‘Tarquin and his brood fled; a consul undertook the government for a year’).

References

Beard, M. (1980), ‘The Sexual Status of Vestal Virgins’, JRS 70, 12-27.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1990), ‘Priesthood in the Roman Republic’, in M. Beard and J. North (eds), Pagan Priests. Religion and Power in the Ancient World. 19-48. London.Google Scholar
Beard, M., J., North and S., Price (1998), Religions of Rome, vol. 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E. (2010), Il rex sacrorum a Roma e nell’Italia antica. Milan.Google Scholar
Blaive, F. (1995), ‘ Rex sacrorum. Recherches sur la fonction religieuse de la royauté romaine’, RIDA 42, 125-154.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. (1993), ‘Three Roman Aetiological Myths’, in F. Graf (ed.), Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft. 158-174. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2007), ‘The Imperial Pontifex’, HSCP 103, 341-384.Google Scholar
Coppin, F. (2013), Le Rex sacrorum: un vestige romain de la royauté sous la république et l’empire. Norderstedt.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome. Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars, c. 1000-264 BC. London.Google Scholar
Curti, E. (2000), ‘From Concordia to the Quirinal. Notes on Religion and Politics in Mid Republican/Hellenistic Rome’, in E. Bispham and C. Smith (eds), Religion in Archaic and Republican Rome: Evidence and Experience. 77-91. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. (1963), Inscriptiones Italiae XII: Fasti et Elogia II, Fasti Numani et Iuliani. Rome.Google Scholar
Dunkle, R. (1971-2), ‘The Greek Tyrant and Roman Political Invective of the Late Republic’, TAPhA 98, 51-71.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1991), ‘Hellenistic Monarchy and Roman Political Invective’, CQ 41, 106-120.Google Scholar
Goldberg, C. (2015), ‘Priests and Politicians: rex sacrorum and flamen Dialis in the Middle Republic’, Phoenix 69, 334-354.Google Scholar
Haeperen, F. van (2002), Le collège pontifical (3ème s. a.C.-4ème s. p.C.). Contribution à l’étude de la religion publique romaine. Brussels-Rome.Google Scholar
Holland, L. A. (1961), Janus and the Bridge. Rome.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1986), ‘The Augural Law’, in ANRW II.16.3, 2146-2312.Google Scholar
Liou-Gille, B. (2000), ‘Les Agonia, le rex sacrorum, et l’organisation du calendier’, Euphrosyne 28, 41-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loicq, J. (2004), ‘Le rex sacrorum: prêtre de la république ou roi déchu?’, in Images d’origines. Origines d’une image: hommages à J. Poucet. 223-241. Louvain.Google Scholar
Magdelain, A. (1964), ‘ Auspicia ad patres redeunt ’, in M. Renard and R. Schilling (eds), Hommages à J. Bayet. 427-473. Brussels.Google Scholar
Malloch, S. J. V. (2008), ‘Scriba Pontificius (Livy 22.57.3 and SHA Opil. 7.2)’, Philologus 152, 155-158.Google Scholar
Marco Simón, F. (1996), Flamen Dialis. El sacerdote de Júpiter en la religión romana. Madrid.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1969), ‘Il rex sacrorum e l’origine della repubblica’, in Studi in onore di E. Volterra. 357-364. Milan. (=[1969], Quarto Contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. 395-402. Rome)Google Scholar
Mommsen, Th. (1864), Römische Forschungen, vol. 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
North, J. A. (2008), ‘Action and Ritual in Roman Historians; or How Horatius Held the Door-Post’, in A. H. Rasmussen and S. W. Rasmussen (eds), Religion and Society: Rituals, Resources and Identity in the Ancient Graeco-Roman World. 23-36. Rome.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1990), Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton.Google Scholar
Orlin, E. M. (1997), Temples, Religion, and Politics in the Roman Republic. Leiden.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. E. A. (1970), The Archaic Community of the Romans. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. E. A. (1996), ‘The Deconstruction of Mommsen on Festus 462/464L, or the Hazards of Restoration’, in J. Linderski (ed.), Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic. 75-101. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2004), ‘ Acta aut agenda: Relations of Script and Performance’, in A. Barchiesi, J. Rüpke, and S. Stephens (eds), Rituals in Ink. A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome. 23-44. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2008), Fasti Sacerdotum. A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 BC to AD 499. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2011), The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History, and the Fasti. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012a), Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2012b), ‘Rationalizing Religious Practices: The Pontifical Calendar and the Law’, in O. Tellegen-Couperus (ed.), Law and Religion in the Roman Republic. 85-106. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2013), ‘Priestly auctoritas in the Roman Republic’, CQ 63, 743-763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seguin, R. (1988), ‘Remarques sur les origines des pontifes romains: pontifex maximus et rex sacrorum ’, in D. Porte and J.-R. Nérandau (eds), Hommages à H. LeBonniec. Res sacrae. 405-418. Brussels.Google Scholar
Sheehan, J. (2016), ‘The Sacrificing King: Ancients, Moderns, and the Politics of Religion’, in A. Blair and A.-S. Goeing (eds), For the Sake of Learning: Essays in Honor of Anthony Grafton 1. 344-363. Leiden.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2011), ‘The Magistrates of the Early Roman Republic’, in H. Beck, A. Duplá, M. Jehne, and F. Pina Polo (eds), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. 19-40. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (2016), ‘Caesar as Pontifex Maximus’, in F. Santangelo (ed.), Approaching the Roman Revolution: Papers on Republican History. 186-195. Oxford.Google Scholar
Szemler, G. J. (1972), The Priests of the Roman Republic. A Study of Interactions between Priesthoods and Magistracies. Brussels.Google Scholar
Szemler, G. J. (1978), ‘Pontifex’, RE Suppl. 15, 331-396.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1993), ‘The Lex Papiria de Dedicationibus ’, CP 88, 319-328.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1960), The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic. Rome.Google Scholar
Vanggaard, J. H. (1988), The Flamen: A Study in the History and Sociology of Roman Religion. Copenhagen.Google Scholar