Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 31
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bradbury, Jennie Davies, Douglas Jay, Mandy Philip, Graham Roberts, Charlotte and Scarre, Chris 2016. Making the Dead Visible: Problems and Solutions for “Big” Picture Approaches to the Past, and Dealing with Large “Mortuary” Datasets. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 561.

    Evans, Tim N.L. 2016. Twilight over England? Archaeological Excavation in England 1938–1945. European Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 335.

    Howard, Andy J. Gearey, Ben R. and Krawiec, Kristina 2016. Log boats, wooden structures, peat and palaeochannels, the challenges and opportunities afforded by decadal monitoring of an active quarry: A case study from Shardlow quarry, Middle Trent Valley, UK. CATENA,

    Schlanger, Nathan 2016. ‘If not for you’. The nation state as an archaeological context. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol. 23, Issue. 01, p. 48.

    Hamilakis, Yannis 2015. Archaeology and the Logic of Capital: Pulling the Emergency Break. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 721.

    James Frederick Gerrard, 2015. Synthesis, Chronology, and “Late Roman” Cemeteries in Britain. American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 119, Issue. 4, p. 565.

    Richards, Julian Tudhope, Douglas and Vlachidis, Andreas 2015. Mathematics and Archaeology.

    Zorzin, Nicolas 2015. Dystopian Archaeologies: the Implementation of the Logic of Capital in Heritage Management. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 791.

    Moore, Ray and Evans, Tim 2013. Preserving the Grey Literature Explosion: PDF/A and the Digital Archive. Information Standards Quarterly, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 20.

    Nielsen, Svein Vatsvag 2013. From Committee to Controversy: An Actor-Network Analysis of the Re-Organization of the Norwegian CHM. Advances in Anthropology, Vol. 03, Issue. 03, p. 142.

    Beck, Anthony and Neylon, Cameron 2012. A vision for Open Archaeology. World Archaeology, Vol. 44, Issue. 4, p. 479.

    Cooper, Anwen 2012. Pursuing ‘the Pressure of the Past’: British Prehistoric Research, 1980–2010. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, Vol. 78, p. 315.

    Hodgson, Nick 2012. Assessing the Contribution of Commercial Archaeology to the Study of Roman South and West Yorkshire, 1990–2004. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, Vol. 84, Issue. 1, p. 38.

    Batemen, Jonathan and Jeffrey, Stuart 2011. What Matters about the Monument: reconstructing historical classification. Internet Archaeology, Issue. 29,

    Cherry, Martin 2011. Buildings in the Landscape: Informed Conservation for the 21st Century. Landscapes, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 95.

    Gerrard, James 2011. New Light on the End of Roman London. Archaeological Journal, Vol. 168, Issue. 1, p. 181.

    JOHNSON, MATTHEW H. 2011. On the nature of empiricism in archaeology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 764.

    Tudhope, Douglas May, Keith Binding, Ceri and Vlachidis, Andreas 2011. Connecting Archaeological Data and Grey Literature via Semantic Cross Search. Internet Archaeology, Issue. 30,

    Aitchison, Kenneth 2010. Grey Literature, Academic Engagement, and Preservation by Understanding. Archaeologies, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 289.


  • The Antiquaries Journal, Volume 86
  • 2006, pp. 1-13

Bridging the Two Cultures – Commercial Archaeology and the Study of Prehistoric Britain

  • Richard Bradley (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 28 November 2008

This paper was given at a meeting of the Society held on 12 January 2006 and it discusses the relationship between academic research and developer-funded archaeology in Britain today, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each. It considers the relationship between archaeological theory and practice and discusses the changing roles of academics, fieldworkers and managers. It argues that important issues need to be resolved, including the dissemination of information from recent archaeological fieldwork and the use of ‘grey literature’ in informing more ambitious interpretations of the past.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J Barrett 1987. ‘The Glastonbury lake village: models and source criticism’, Archaeol J, 144, 409–23

M Strathern (ed) 2000. Audit Cultures, London

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Antiquaries Journal
  • ISSN: 0003-5815
  • EISSN: 1758-5309
  • URL: /core/journals/antiquaries-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *