Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-k78ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-21T15:42:11.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grinding flour in Upper Palaeolithic Europe (25000 years bp)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Biancamaria Aranguren
Affiliation:
Archaeological Department of Tuscany, Florence, Italy (Email: arangurenb@yahoo.it)
Roberto Becattini
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Florence University, Italy (Email: robertobecattini@yahoo.it; mariotti@unifi.it)
Marta Mariotti Lippi
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Florence University, Italy (Email: robertobecattini@yahoo.it; mariotti@unifi.it)
Anna Revedin
Affiliation:
Italian Institute of Prehistory & Protohistory, Florence, Italy (Email: annarevedin@iipp.it)

Extract

The authors have identified starch grains belonging to wild plants on the surface of a stone from the Gravettian hunter-gatherer campsite of Bilancino (Florence, Italy), dated to around 25000bp. The stone can be seen as a grindstone and the starch has been extracted from locally growing edible plants. This evidence can be claimed as implying the making of flour – and presumably some kind of bread – some 15 millennia before the local ‘agricultural revolution’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aranguren, B. & Revedin, A.. 1997. Il ciottolo inciso e utilizzato dall'insediamento gravettiano di Bilancino e i “ciottoli a cuppelle” in Italia. Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche 48: 187222.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B. & Revedin, A. 1998. L'habitat gravettien de Bilancino (Barberino di Mugello - Italie centrale), in Proceedings of XIII International Congress of UISPP, Forlì (Italy) 8-14 September 1996, 2: 511–16.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B. & Revedin, A. 2001. Interprétation fonctionnelle d'un site gravettien à burins de Noailles. L'Anthropologie 105: 533–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranguren, B. & Revedin, A. 2005. Dalla tipologia analitica alla catena operativa e funzionale: per una nuova definizione del Bulino di Noailles, in Martini, F. (ed.) Askategi: Miscellanea in memoria di Georges Laplace (Supplemento 1 della Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche): 137–50. Firenze: Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B. & Revedin, A. In press. Evidenze archeologiche di strategie di sussistenza legate alle risorse vegetali presso i cacciatori-raccoglitori, in 4° Convegno Nazionale di Etnoarcheologia, Roma 17-19 maggio 2006. Roma: Associazione Italiana di Etnoarcheologia.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Giachi, G., Pallecchi, P. & Revedin, A.. 2001. Primi dati sul focolare gravettiano di Bilancino, in Atti della XXXIV Riunione Scientifica IIPP ‘Preistoria e Protostoria della Toscana’ dedicata ad Antonio Mario Radmilli: 337–48. Firenze: Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Revedin, A., Bartolacci, S. & Morandi, R.. 2003a. L’insediamento gravettiano di Bilancino (Firenze), in Peretto, C. (ed.) Analisi informatizzata e trattamento dati delle strutture di abitato di età preistorica e protostorica in Italia: 7181. Firenze: Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Giachi, G., Lippi, M. Mariotti, Secci, M. Mori, Revedin, A. & Rodolfi, G.. 2003b. Paleoecological data on the Gravettian settlement of Bilancino (Florence, Italy), in Patou, M.-Mathis & Bocherens, H. (ed.) Le rôle de l'environnement dans les comportements des chasseurs-cueilleurs préhistoriques, Actes du XIVè Congrès UISPP, Université de Liège 2001, Colloque/Symposium C3.1 (British Archaeological Reports International Series S1105): 171–79. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Revedin, A. & Bagnari, M. R.. 2004a. Interpretazione funzionale del sito di Bilancino (Firenze), in Barogi, M. & Lugli, F. (ed.) 2° Convegno Nazionale di Etnoarcheologia, Mondaino 7-8 giugno 2001: 126–39. Rimini: Raffaelli.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Revedin, A., Sozzi, M., Vannucci, M. L. & Vannucci, S.. 2004b. First results on provisioning sources of siliceous raw materials from the Gravettian site of Bilancino (Florence, Italy), in Secrétariat du Congrès (ed.) Section 6. Le Paléolithique Supérieur / The Upper Palaeolithic, General sessions and posters, Acts of the XIVth UISPP Congress, University of Liège, 2001 (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1240): 119–26. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Pallecchi, P. & Revedin, A.. 2006. Circolazione e utilizzo dell'ematite nell'ambito della diffusione di conoscenze tecnologiche nel Paleolitico superiore: l'esempio di Bilancino, in Genick, D. Cocchi (ed.) Materie prime e scambi nella preistoria italiana, Atti della XXXIX Riunione Scientifica dell' Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria, Firenze, 2004: 253–66. Firenze: Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Longo, L., Pallecchi, P. P & Revedin, A.. 2007. The operative chain of the Noailles Burin: tipology, technology and functionality, in Burins: formes, fonctionnements, functions, Actes de la Table Ronde d' Aix-en-Provence, 3-5 mars 2003: 87106.Google Scholar
Aranguren, B., Longo, L. & Revedin, A.. In press. Bilancino, a specialized site for ‘latent technology’: an integrated approach, in Prehistoric Technology, Proceedings of an International Congress in Verona 20-23 april 2005.Google Scholar
Barton, H., Torrence, R. & Fullagar, R.. 1998. Clues to Stone Tool Function Re-examined: Comparing Starch Grain Frequencies on Used and Unused Obsidian Artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science. 25: 1231–38.Google Scholar
Cordain, L. 2002. The Nutritional Characteristics of a Contemporary Diet Based Upon Paleolitithic Food Groups. Journal or American Neutraceutical Association 5:1524.Google Scholar
De Beaune, S. A. 2000. Pour une archéologie du geste. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
De Beaune, S. A. 2004. The Invention of Technology: Prehistory and Cognition. Current Anthropology. 45(2): 139–62.Google Scholar
Fullagar, R. & Field, J.. 1997. Pleistocene seed-grinding implement from the Australian arid zone. Antiquity 71: 300307.Google Scholar
Fullagar, R., Field, J. & Kealhofer, L.. In press. Grinding stones and seeds of change: starch and phytoliths as evidence of plant food processing, in Rowan, Y. M. & Ebeling, J. E. (ed.) New Approaches to Old Stones: Recent Studies of Ground Stone Artifacts IV. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Gott, B. 1999. Cumbungi, Typha Species, a Staple Aboriginal Food in Southern Australia. Australian Aboriginal Studies 1999/1: 3349.Google Scholar
Jensen, W. A. 1962. Botanical histochemistry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman& Co.Google Scholar
Kealhofer, L., Torrence, R. & Fullagar, R.. 1999. Integrating Phytoliths within Use-Wear/Residue Studies of Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 26: 527–46.Google Scholar
Kozlovski, J. K. 2002. Les premiers hommes modernes et les premiers agriculteurs en Europe: voies de diffusion et interactions entre populations, in Otte, M. & Kozlowski, J. K. (ed.) Préhistoire de la Grande Plaine du nord de l'Europe, Liège, ERAUL 99: 934.Google Scholar
Kunkel, G. 1984. Plants for human consumption. Koeningstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.Google Scholar
Lalueza, C., Perez-Perez, A. & Turbon, D.. 1996. Dietary inferences through buccal microwear analysis of middle and upper Pleistocene human fossils. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 100 (3): 367–87.Google Scholar
Mariotti Lippi, M. & Secci, M. Mori. 2002. Palynological investigation at Bilancino dam (Mugello, Central Italy). Webbia 57: 251–64.Google Scholar
Mason, S.R.L., Hatler, J. G. & Hillman, G. C.. 1994. Preliminary investigation of plant macro-remains from Dolni Vestonice II, and its implications for the role of plant foods in Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Europe. Antiquity 68: 4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, S., Hillman, G. & Hather, J.. nd. Investigation of the role of Wild Plant Foods in Pre-Agrarian Europe, in http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/research/profiles/smason/smresear.htm.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. M. 1989. Paleoethnobotan: a handbook of procedures. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D.M., Chandler-Ezell, K. & Zeidler, J. A.. 2004. Maize in ancient Ecuador: Results of residue analysis of stone tools from Real Alto site. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 423–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piperno, R. D. & Holst, I.. 1998. The presence of starch grains on prehistoric stone tools from the lowland Neotropics: Indication of early tuber use andagriculture in Panama. Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 765–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piperno, R. D., Weiss, E., Holst, I. & Nadel, D.. 2004. Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Nature 430: 670–73.Google Scholar
Seidemann, J. 1996. Stärke Atlas: Grundlagen der Stärke-Mikroskopie und Beschreibung der wichtigsten Stärkearten. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Tateoka, T. 1962. Starch Grains of Endosperm in Grass Systematics. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 75: 377–83.Google Scholar
Torrence, R., Wright, R. & Conway, R.. 2004. Identification of starch granules using image analysis and multivariate techniques. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 519–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, K. 1991. The origins and development of ground stone assemblages in Late Pleistocene Southwest Asia. Paléorient 17/1: 1945.Google Scholar
Wright, K. 1992. A classification system for ground stone tools from the Prehistoric Levant. Paléorient 18/2: 5381.Google Scholar