Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Native and nonnative processing of Japanese pitch accent

  • XIANGHUA WU (a1), JUNG-YUEH TU (a2) and YUE WANG (a1)
Abstract

The theoretical framework of this study is based on the prevalent debate of whether prosodic processing is influenced by higher level linguistic-specific circuits or reflects lower level encoding of physical properties. Using the dichotic listening technique, the study investigates the hemispheric processing of Japanese pitch accent by native Japanese listeners and two groups of nonnative listeners with no prior pitch accent experience but differing in their native language experience with linguistic pitch: native listeners of Mandarin (a tone language with higher linguistic functional use of pitch) and native listeners of English (a stress language with lower functional use of pitch). The overall results reveal that, for both native and nonnative listeners, the processing of Japanese pitch accent is less lateralized (compared to lexical tone processing, which has been found to be a left hemisphere property). However, detailed analysis with individual pitch accents across groups shows a right hemisphere preference for processing the high–accent–low (H*L) pattern, a left hemisphere preference for LH*, and no hemisphere dominance for LH, indicating a significant reliance on the acoustic cues. These patterns are particularly prominent with the English listeners who are least experienced with linguistic pitch. Together, the findings suggest an interplay of linguistic and acoustic aspects in the processing of Japanese pitch accent by native and nonnative listeners.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Xianghua Wu, Department of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, 9212 Robert C. Brown Hall Building, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. E-mail: xianghua_wu@sfu.ca
References
Hide All
Aasland, W., & Baum, S. (2003). Temporal parameters as cues to phrasal boundaries: A comparison of processing by left-hemisphere-damaged and right-hemisphere-damaged individuals. Brain and Language, 87, 385399.
Amano, S., & Kondo, T. (1999). Nihongo-no goitokusei [Lexical properties of Japanese]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
Arciuli, J., & Slowiaczek, L. M. (2007). The where and when of linguistic word-level prosody. Neuropsychologia, 45, 26382642.
Baum, S. (2002). Word recognition in individuals with left and right hemisphere damage: The role of lexical stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 233246.
Baum, S., & Pell, M. (1999). The neural bases of speech prosody: Insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging. Aphasiology, 13, 581608.
Berker, F., & Reinvang, I. (2007). Mismatch negativity elicited by tones and speech sounds: Changed topographical distribution in aphasia. Brain and Language, 100, 6978.
Bever, T. G. (1975). Cerebral asymmetries in humans are due to the differentiation of two incompatible processes: Holistic and analytic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 163, 251262.
Bryden, M. P., & Murray, J. E. (1985). Toward a model of dichotic listening performance. Brain and Cognition, 4, 241257.
Chao, Y. R. (1948). Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chernigovskaya, T. V., Svetozarova, N. D., Tokareva, T. I., Tret'yakov, D. A., Ozerskii, P. V., & Strel'nikov, K. N. (2000). Specialization of cerebral hemispheres in the perception of Russian intonations. Human Physiology, 26, 142147 (Translated from Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 26, 24–29).
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, A. (1986). Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29, 201220.
Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. (1999). Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener. In Brown, C. & Hagoort, P. (Eds.), The neurocognition of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dwyer, J., Blumstein, S. E., & Ryalls, J. (1982). The role of duration and rapid temporal processing on the lateral perception of consonants and vowels. Brain and Language, 17, 272286.
Gandour, J., Wong, D., Dzemidzic, M, Lowe, M., Tong, Y., & Li, X. (2003). A cross-linguistic fMRI study of perception of intonation and emotion in Chinese. Human Brain Mapping, 18, 149157.
Gandour, J., Dzemidzic, M., Wong, D., Lowe, M., Tong, Y., Hsieh, L, et al. (2003). Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 84, 318336.
Gandour, J., Tong, Y., Wong, D., Talavage, T., Dzemidzic, M., Xu, Y, et al. (2004). Hemispheric roles in the perception of speech prosody. NeuroImage, 23, 344357.
Gandour, J., Wong, D., Lowe, M., Dzemidzic, M., Satthamnuwing, N., Tong, Y., et al. (2002). A cross-linguistic fMRI study of spectral and temporal cues underlying phonological processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 10761087.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.). (1984). Handbook of cognitive neuroscience. New York: Plenum Press.
Grimshaw, G., Kwasny, K. M., Covell, E., & Johnson, R. A. (2003). The dynamic nature of language lateralization: Effects of lexical and prosodic factors. Neuropsychologia, 41, 10081019.
Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y. C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 395421.
Hayashi, R., Imaizumi, S., Mori, K., Niimi, S., Ueno, S., & Kiritani, S. (2001). Elicitation of N400m in sentence comprehension due to lexical prosody incongruity. NeuroReport, 12, 17531756.
Ivry, R., & Lebby, P. (1993). Hemispheric differences in auditory perception are similar to those found in visual perception. Psychological Science, 4, 4145.
Kaan, E., Wayland, R., Bao, M., & Barkley, C. M. (2007). Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1148, 113122.
Kimura, D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15, 166171.
Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163178.
King, R. (1967). Functional load and sound change. Language, 43, 831852.
Kitahara, M. (2001). Category structure and function of pitch accent in Tokyo Japanese. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Klein, D., Zatorre, R. J., Milner, B., & Zhao, V. (2001). A cross-linguistic PET study of tone perception in Mandarin Chinese and English speakers. NeuroImage, 13, 646653.
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maniwa, K. (2002). Acoustic and perceptual evidence of complete neutralization of word-final tonal specification in Japanese. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 93112.
Millay, K., Roeser, R. J., & Godfrey, J. J. (1977). Reliability of performance for dichotic listening using two response modes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 510518.
Mitchell, R. L. C., & Crow, T. J. (2005). Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: The forgotten hemisphere? Brain, 128, 963978.
Moen, I. (1993). Functional lateralization of the perception of Norwegian word tones—Evidence from a dichotic listening experiment. Brain and Language, 44, 400413.
Moen, I., & Sundet, K. (1996). Production and perception of word tones (pitch accents) in patients with left and right hemisphere damage. Brain and Language, 53, 267281.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97113.
Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Linguistic inquiry monograph 15. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pihan, H., Tabert, M., Assuras, S., & Borod, J. (2008). Unattended emotional intonations modulate linguistic prosody processing. Brain and Language, 105, 141147.
Poeppel, D. (2001). Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code. Cognitive Science, 25, 679693.
Poeppel, D. (2003). The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as “asymmetric sampling in time.” Speech Communication, 41, 245255.
Sadock, J. M., & Zwicky, A. M. (1985). Speech acts distinctions in syntax. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2007). Brain responses in the processing of lexical pitch-accent by Japanese speakers. NeuroReport, 18, 20012004.
Sekiguchi, T. (2006). Effects of lexical prosody and word familiarity on lexical access of spoken Japanese words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 369384.
Shah, A. P., & Baum, S. R. (2006). Perception of lexical stress by brain-damaged individuals: Effects on lexical–semantic activation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 143156.
Shipley-Brown, F., Dingwall, W. O., Berlin, C. I., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Gordon-Salant, S. (1988). Hemispheric processing of affective and linguistic intonation contours in normal subjects. Brain and Language, 33, 1626.
Sugito, M. (1983). Nihongo no akusento to intoneeshon—Tokyo hogen no “hana” to “hana” no soui [Japanese accent and intonation—The difference between “hana ‘flower’” and “hana ‘nose’” in the Tokyo dialect]. In Sugito, M. (Ed.), “hana” to “hana” Nihongo no kenkyu 5. Osaka: Izumishoin. [Reprinted from Kotoba to onsei, “kotoba” Series 18]
Sugiyama, Y. (2006). Japanese pitch accent: Examination of final-accented and unaccented minimal pairs. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 7388.
Surendran, D., & Niyogi, P. (2006). Quantifying the functional load of phonemic oppositions, distinctive features, and suprasegmentals. In Thomsen, O. Nedergaard (Ed.), Competing models of language change: Evolution and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Lancker, D. (1980). Cerebral lateralization of pitch cues in the linguistic signal. Papers in Linguistics, 13, 201277.
Van Lancker, D., & Fromkin, V. (1973). Hemispheric specialization for pitch and tone: Evidence from Thai. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 101109.
Vance, T. J. (1995). Final accent vs. no accent: Utterance-final neutralization in Tokyo Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 487499.
Walsh, D. L. (1996). Limiting-domains in lexical access: Processing of lexical prosody. In Dickey, M. & Tunstall, S. (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 19: Linguistics in the laboratory. Amherst: GLSA.
Wang, Y., Behne, D., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2004). The role of linguistic experience in the hemispheric processing of lexical tone. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 449466.
Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (2001). Dichotic perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese and American listeners. Brain and Language, 78, 332348.
Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., Jongman, A., & Hirsch, J. (2003). fMRI evidence for cortical modification during learning of Mandarin lexical tone. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 19.
Wong, P. C. M., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 420422.
Zatorre, R. J., & Gandour, J. T. (2008). Neural specializations for speech and pitch: Moving beyond the dichotomies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363, 10871104.
Zatorre, R. J., & Samson, S. (1991). Role of the right temporal neocortex in retention of pitch in auditory short-term memory. Brain, 114, 24032417.
Zhang, L., Shu, H., Zhou, F., Wang, X., & Li, P. (2010). Common and distinct neural substrates for the perception of speech rhythm and intonation. Human Brain Mapping, 7, 11061116.
Zhao, J., Shu, H., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Gong, Q., & Li, P. (2008). Cortical competition during language discrimination. NeuroImage, 43, 624633.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed