Skip to main content Accessibility help

Perceptual restoration in children versus adults


Children often listen to speech in noisy environments, where they must use prior knowledge to help them interpret the intended signal. The present experiment compares school-aged children's and adults' use of one such form of prior knowledge, as demonstrated in the perceptual restoration effect. Children, like adults, perform better when speech is intermittently replaced with noise than when it is replaced with silence, suggesting that children are able to make use of prior knowledge to help them restore interrupted signals. Despite this fact, children appear to be more affected by acoustic signal disruptions than are adult listeners, suggesting they will experience greater difficulty in noisy environments.

Corresponding author
Department of Hearing & Speech Sciences, Center for Neuroscience & Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. E-mail:
Hide All
Bashford J. A., & Warren R. M. 1987 Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 114121.
Braaten R. F., & Leary J. C. 1999 Temporal induction of missing birdsong segments in European starlings. Psychological Science, 10, 162166.
Carey S. 1978 The child as word learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DeWitt L. A., & Samuel A. G. 1990 The role of knowledge-based expectations in music perception: Evidence from musical restoration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 123144.
Elliott L. L., Busse L. A., Partridge R., Rupert J., & DeGraaff R. 1986 Adult and child discrimination of CV syllables differing in voicing onset time. Child Development, 57, 628635.
Elliott L. L., Clifton L. A. B., & Servi D. G. 1983 Word frequency effects for a closed-set word identification task. Audiology, 22, 229240.
Elliott L. L., Connors S., Kille E., Levin S., Ball K., & Katz D. 1979 Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1221.
Elliott L. L., Hammer M. A., Scholl M. E., & Wasowicz J. M. 1989 Age differences in discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 181186.
Finitzo–Hieber T., & Tillman T. W. 1978 Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 440458.
Hétu R., Truchon–Gagnon C., & Bilodeau S. A. 1990 Problems of noise in school settings: A review of literature and the results of an exploratory study. Journal of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology, 14, 3139.
Kalikow D. N., Stevens K. N., & Elliott L. L. 1977 Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 13371351.
Koroleva I. V., Kashina I. A., Sakhnovskaya O. S., & Shurgaya G. G. 1991 Perceptual restoration of a missing phoneme: New data on speech perception in children. Sensory Systems, 5, 191199.
Manlove E. E., Frank T., & Vernon–Feagans L. 2001 Why should we care about noise in classrooms and child care settings? Child & Youth Care Forum, 30, 5564.
McGregor K. K., Friedman R. M., Reilly R. M., & Newman R. M. 2002 Semantic representation and naming in young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 332346.
Picard M., & Bradley J. S. 2001 Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. Audiology, 40, 221244.
Powers G. L., & Wilcox J. C. 1977 Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 195199.
Samuel A. 1996 Phoneme restoration. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 647653.
Samuel A. G. 1981a Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474494.
Samuel A. G. 1981b The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 11241131.
Samuel A. G. 1987 Lexical uniqueness effects in phonemic restoration. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 3656.
Samuel A. G. 1996 Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 2851.
Samuel A. G. 1997 Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 97127.
Sasaki T. 1980 Sound restoration and temporal localization of noise in speech and music sounds. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 39, 7988.
Schultz–Westre C. 1985 A visual analog of phonemic restorations: Sign restoration in American Sign Language. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Smith M. K. 1941 Measurement of the size of general English vocabulary through the elementary grades and high school. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 24, 311345.
Walley A. C. 1987 Young children's detections of word-initial and -final mispronunciations in constrained and unconstrained contexts. Cognitive Development, 2, 145167.
Warren R. M. 1970 Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392393.
Warren R. M., & Obusek C. J. 1971 Speech perception and phonemic restorations. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 358362.
Warren R. M., & Warren R. P. 1970 Auditory illusions and confusions. Scientific American, 223, 3036.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed