Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Prominence of gender cues in the assignment of thematic roles in German

  • YULIA ESAULOVA (a1), CHIARA REALI (a2) and LISA VON STOCKHAUSEN (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Two eye-tracking experiments examined influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender cues on the assignment of thematic roles in German. Participants (N 1 = 32, N 2 = 40) read sentences with subject- and object-extracted relative clauses, where thematic agents and patients remained ambiguous until the end of the relative clause. The results reveal a linguistic gender bias: agent roles are assigned more easily to grammatically masculine than feminine role nouns and stereotypically neutral than female ones. The opposite pattern is observed in the assignment of patient roles for stereotypical but not grammatical gender. The findings are discussed within the framework of situation model theories as well as in constraint-based and similarity-based interference accounts, while gender is viewed as a dimension of prominence.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Yulia Esaulova, Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24–25, Potsdam 14476, Germany. E-mail: esaulova@uni-potsdam.de
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Aissen (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435483.

M. R. Banaji , & C. D. Hardin (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136141. doi:10.1111/j.14679280.1996.tb00346.x

C. J. Beukeboom , C. Finkenauer , & D. H. J. Wigboldus (2010). The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 978992. doi:10.1037/a0020861

J. E. Boland , M. K. Tanenhaus , S. M. Garnsey , & G. N. Carlson (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 774806. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1034

I. Bornkessel , S. Zysset , A. D. Friederici , D. Y. Von Cramon , & M. Schlesewsky (2005). Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 26, 221233.

I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky , & M. Schlesewsky (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P 600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59, 5573. doi:10.1016/j. brainresrev.2008.05.003

I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky , & M. Schlesewsky (2009). The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3, 1958. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00099.x

M. Breen , & C. Clifton Jr. (2011). Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 153170. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.001

H. Bußmann , & M. Hellinger (2003). German: Engendering female visibility in German. In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages (Vol. 3, pp. 141174). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

C. Cacciari , P. Corradini , R. Padovani , & M. Carreiras (2011). Pronoun resolution in Italian: The role of grammatical gender and context. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 416434. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.526599

C. Cacciari , & R. Padovani (2007). Further evidence on gender stereotype priming in language: Semantic facilitation and inhibition on Italian role nouns. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 277293. doi:10.1017/S0142716407070142

C. Clifton Jr., M. J. Traxler , M. T. Mohamed , R. S. Williams , R. K. Morris , & K. Rayner (2003). The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 317334. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00070-6

N. Cohn , & M. Paczynski (2013). Prediction, events, and the advantage of agents: The processing of semantic roles in visual narrative. Cognitive Psychology, 67, 7397.

G. G. Corbett (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

S. E. Cross , & L. Madson (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 537. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5

J. G. de Villiers , & H. B. Flusberg (1975). Some facts one simply cannot deny. Journal of Child Language, 2, 279286. doi:10.1017/S0305000900001100

Y. Esaulova , C. Reali , & L. von Stockhausen (2014). Influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender during reading: Eye movements in pronominal and noun phrase anaphor resolution. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 781803. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.794295

S. T. Fiske , A. Cuddy , & P. Glick (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 7783. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

A. D. Friederici , K. Steinhauer , A. Mecklinger , & M. Meyer (1998). Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 193221. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(97)00033-1

U. Gabriel , P. Gygax , O. Sarrasin , A. Garnham , & J. Oakhill (2008). Au-pairs are rarely male: Role names’ gender stereotype information across three languages. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 206212.

S. C. Garrod , & M. Terras (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 526544.

S. P. Gennari , & M. C. MacDonald (2008). Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 161187. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004

V. S. Helgeson (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412

L. Irmen (2007). What's in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 431456. doi:10.1007/s10936-007-9053-z

L. Irmen , D. V. Holt , & M. Weisbrod (2010). Effects of role typicality on processing person information in German: Evidence from an ERP study. Brain Research, 1353, 133144. doi:10.1016/j. brainres.2010.07.018

L. Irmen , & E. Schumann (2011). Processing grammatical gender of role nouns: Further evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 9981014. doi:10.1080/20445911. 2011.596824

M. A. Just , & P. A. Carpenter (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122

Y. Kamide , G. T. M. Altmann , & S. L. Haywood (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133156.

U. Klein , D. Guntsetseg , & K. von Heusinger (2012). Case in conflict: Embedded subjects in Mongolian. In M. J. A. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 4364). Dordrecht: Springer.

A. M. Koenig , A. A. Mitchell , A. H. Eagly , & T. Ristikari (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616642. doi:10.1037/a0023557

H. Kreiner , P. Sturt , & G. Garrod (2008). Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 239261. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.003

F. Kretzschmar , I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky , A. Staub , D. Roehm , & M. Schlesewsky (2012). Prominence facilitates ambiguity resolution: On the interaction between referentiality, thematic roles and word order in syntactic reanalysis. In M. J. A. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 239271). Dordrecht: Springer.

S. Kürschner , & D. Nübling (2011). The interaction of gender and declension in Germanic languages. Folia Linguistica, 45, 355388.

M. J. A. Lamers (2012). Argument linearization in Dutch: A multi-factorial approach. In M. J. A. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 121144). Dordrecht: Springer.

M. J. A. Lamers , & P. de Swart (2012). The interaction of case, word order and prominence: Language production and comprehension in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. J. A. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 116). Dordrecht: Springer.

C. Leys , C. Ley , O. Klein , P. Bernard , & L. Licata (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the mean. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 764766.

A. Maass , D. Salvi , L. Arcuri , & G. Semin (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981993. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.981

M. C. MacDonald (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157201. doi:10.1080/01690969408402115

M. MacDonald , N. Pearlmutter , & M. Seidenberg (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676

W. M. Mak , W. Vonk , & H. Schriefers (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 5068. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2837

W. M. Mak , W. Vonk , & H. Schriefers (2006). Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 466490. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.001

J. L. McDonald , J. K. Bock , & M. H. Kelly (1993). Word and word order: Semantic, phonological and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188230.

K. McRae , M. Hare , J. L. Elman , & T. Ferretti (2005). A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Memory and Cognition, 33, 11741184.

J. Miller (1991). Reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: Bias varies with sample size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 907912.

M. J. Pickering , M. J. Traxler , & M. W. Crocker (2000). Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 447475. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2708

B. Primus (2011). Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives. Lingua, 121, 8099.

B. Primus (2012). Animacy, generalized semantic roles, and differential object marking. In M. J. A. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 6590). Dordrecht: Springer.

K. Rayner , S. C. Sereno , R. K. Morris , A. R. Schmauder , & C. Clifton Jr. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 2149. doi:10.1080/01690968908406362

C. Reali , Y. Esaulova , & L. von Stockhausen (in press). Isolating stereotypical gender in a grammatical gender language: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 9771006. doi:10.1017/S0142716414000010

F. Reali , & M. H. Christiansen (2007). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 123. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014

S. Romaine (2001). A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 153175). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

A. J. Sanford , & S. C. Garrod (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159190. doi:10.1080/01638539809545043

G. R. Semin , & K. Fiedler (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558568. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558

J. T. Spence , & C. E. Buckner (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 4462. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01021.x

A. Staub (2010). Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 116, 7186. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.002

M. J. Traxler , R. K. Morris , & R. E. Seely (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 6990. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2836

M. J. Traxler , R. S. Williams , S. A. Blozis , & R. K. Morris (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 204224. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010

J. C. Trueswell , M. K. Tanenhaus , & S. M. Garnsey (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285318. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1014

L. Wang , M. Schlesewsky , M. Philipp , & I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky (2012). The role of animacy in online argument interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. In M. J. A. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 91119). Dordrecht: Springer.

L. Yager , N. Hellmold , H.-A. Joo , M. T. Putnam , E. Rossi , C. Stafford , & J. Salmons (2015). New structural patterns in moribund grammar: Case marking in Heritage German. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1716. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01716

R. A. Zwaan , & G. A. Radvansky (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.1

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 40 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 193 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th May 2017 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.