Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The architecture of justice: iconography and space configuration in the English law court building

  • Julienne Hanson (a1)
Abstract

A series of changes is identified in the iconography of the English courtroom, which seems to indicate a gradual liberalisation in the architecture of justice. However, it is suggested that this masks a deeper continuity in the layout and space configuration of the law court building, which relates to the fundamental social programme which it has to fulfil. Configurationallyspeaking, the space of the courtroom, which appears so powerfully to integrate the actors in the courtroom drama, turns out to be ‘virtual’. Although the actors can see and hear each other perfectly well, they actually inhabit separate and mutually-exclusive physical domains. The locus of spatial integration is to be found in the backstage corridors of the law court which, it is argued, is the place where legal negotiations take place. Thus, though it would be theoretically possible to reproduce the social programme of the law court in a virtual reality courtroom, this would be at the expense of a vital generative function served by the building, which is to ensure that specific legal conflicts are resolved in the interests of a wider social justice.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Durkheim, E. (1893). The Division of Labour in Society. Trans. Simpson, G., Macmillan Free Press, New York, 1933.
Ernst, B. (1985). The Magic Mirror of M. C. Escher. Tarquin Publications, Norfolk, 1985.
Evans, R. (1978). ‘Figures Doors and Passages’. Architectural Design, 04 1978, p.267 and p.271.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan, A., Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
Goodsell, C. (1988). The Social Meaning of Civic Space: studying political authority through architecture. University Press of Kansas, USA.
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and London.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1973). Trisfes Tropiques. Jonathan Cape, London, 1973, p.246.
Levitas, G. (1978). ‘Anthropology and the Sociology of Streets’. In Anderson, S. ed. On Streets, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Maddox, A. (1994). The Work of a Magistrate. Shaw and Sons, London, p.15.
Mountford, E.W. (1906). ‘The New Sessions House London’. Architectural Review, Vol. 21, p.139.
Pevsner, N. (1976). A History of Building Types. Thames and Hudson, London, p.34.
Van Gennep, A. (1909). The Rites of Passage. Trans. Vizedom, M. and Caffee, G., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1960.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

arq: Architectural Research Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1359-1355
  • EISSN: 1474-0516
  • URL: /core/journals/arq-architectural-research-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed