Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Revisiting Critical Legal Pluralism: Normative Contestations in the Afghan Courtroom

  • Nafay CHOUDHURY (a1)

This paper revisits the concept of critical legal pluralism, which treats the individual as a site of normativity with the capacity to create legal knowledge. To help operationalize the usage of critical legal pluralism, I propose a methodological approach that places the individual’s ability to makes choices along a continuum. On one side of continuum, legal pluralism can be viewed as facilitating fully discrete choices that ascribe to one legal order or another. On the other side, the ability to make individual choices is curtailed because of the presence of a hegemonic legal order. This simple continuum helps to shed light on the complex considerations that affect individual choices, which in turn affect how various legal orders are legitimated. The paper then considers how critical legal pluralism can enrich the discussion on the legal system of Afghanistan, focusing on interviews with two Afghan justice actors: a former judge and an active defence lawyer.

Hide All

I thank Werner Menski for his thorough review of an earlier draft. Farhana Rahman provided helpful comments on the final paper. Siddiqullah Reshtya and Ahmed Shakir Morid provided me useful information on Afghanistan’s judiciary. I also benefitted from the feedback of five law students at the American University of Afghanistan (AUAF): Meherafroz Ghani, Gharsanay Amin, Abdul Naser Rahmani, Sana Ahmadi, and Ahmad Ratib Nazari. A draft of this paper was presented at the Juris Diversitas Annual Conference at the University of Limerick, where I received rich feedback from the conference participants. Any errors are solely my own.


PhD Researcher, Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London. Previously Assistant Professor of Law at the AUAF. LL.B./B.C.L., McGill University; MA, Queen’s University; BA, McGill University.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Mandana K.R. Afshar (2006) “The Case of an Afghan Apostate: The Right to a Fair Trial between Islamic Law and Human Rights in the Afghan Constitution,” in A. von Bogdandy & R. Wolfrum, eds., Max Planck Yearbook on United Nations Law, Leiden: Koninklijke Brill N.V., 591605.

S.N. Balagangadhara (2012) Reconceptualizing India Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas Barfield (2010) Afghanistan: A Cultural And Political History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Franz von Benda-Beckmann (2002) “Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?” 47 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 3782.

Paul S. Berman (2002) “The Globalization of Jurisdiction.” 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 311529.

John Bowen (2003) Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reason, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Masaji Chiba (1998) “Other Phases of Legal Pluralism in the Contemporary World.” 11 Ratio Juris 228245.

Antonio De Lauri (2013) “Corruption, Legal Modernisation and Judicial Practice in Afghanistan.” 37 Asian Studies Review 527545.

Michael Feener (2013) Shari’a and Social Engineering: The Implementation of Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

H. Patrick Glenn (2010) Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

John Griffiths (1986) “What Is Legal Pluralism.” 24 Journal of Legal Pluralism & Unofficial Law 155.

Herbert L.A. Hart (2012) The Concept of Law, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jamila Hussain (2011) “More Than One Law for All: Legal Pluralism in Southeast Asia.” 7 Democracy and Security 374389.

Robert L. Kidder (2002) “Exploring Legal Culture in Law-Avoidance Societies,” in June Starr & Mark Goodale, eds., Practicing Ethnography, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 87107.

Martha-Marie Kleinhans , & Macdonald Roderick A. (1997) “What Is a Critical Legal Pluralism.” 12 Canadian Journal of Law & Society 25.

Roderick A. Macdonald (2011) “Custom Made for a Non-Chirographic Critical Legal Pluralism.” 26 Canadian Journal of Law and Society 301327.

Werner Menski (2006) Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sally Engle Merry (1988) “Legal Pluralism.” 22 Law & Society Review 869896.

Muna Ndulo (2011) “African Customary Law, Customs, and Women’s Rights.” 18 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 87120.

Mathias Reimann (2002) “Progress and Failure of Comparative Law in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century.” 50 American Journal of Comparative Law 671700.

Victor Roudometof (2005) “Transnationalism, Cosmopolitanism and Glocalization.” 53 Current Sociology 113135.

Tabassum Ruby (2006) “Listening to the Voices of the Hijab.” 29 Women’s Studies International Forum 5466.

Gopika Solanki (2011) Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism and Gender Equality in India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Geoffrey Swenson , & Eli Sugerman (2011) “Building the Rule of Law in Afghanistan: The Importance of Legal Education.” 3 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 130146.

Brian Z. Tamanaha (1993) “The Folly of the ‘Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism.” 20 Journal of Law and Society 192217.

Brian Z. Tamanaha (1995) “An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law.” 15 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 501535.

Brian Z. Tamanaha (2000) “A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism.” 27 Journal of Law and Society 296321.

Brian Z. Tamanaha , Caroline Mary Sage & Michael J.V. Woolcock (2012) Legal Pluralism and Development: Scholars and Practitioners in Dialogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tahir Wasti (2009) The Application of Islamic Criminal Law in Pakistan: Sharia in Practice, Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Marvin G. Weinbaum (1980) “Legal Elites in Afghan Society.” 12 International Journal of Middle East Studies 3957.

Jane K. Winn (1994) “Relational Practice and the Marginalization of Law: Information Financial Practices of Small Businesses in Taiwan.” 28 Law & Society Review 193232.

Gordon Woodman (1998) “Ideological Combat and Social Observation: Recent Debate about Legal Pluralism.” 42 Journal of Legal Pluralism 2159.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Asian Journal of Law and Society
  • ISSN: 2052-9015
  • EISSN: 2052-9023
  • URL: /core/journals/asian-journal-of-law-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 85 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 183 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th March 2017 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.