Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T22:03:59.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a theory of critical energy literacy: the Youth Strike for Climate, renewable energy and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2021

Gregory Lowan-Trudeau*
University of Calgary, Werklund School of Education, Calgary, Canada CA
Teresa Anne Fowler
Concordia University of Edmonton, Department of Physical Education & Wellness, Faculty of Education, Edmonton, Canada CA
*Corresponding author. E-mail:
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


The Youth Strike for Climate raised important global attention to interconnected climate, energy and environmental issues — it also compelled us to consider what we will do to address these pressing challenges. Developed through consideration of such dynamics, we propose critical energy literacy as an emerging theory that denotes understanding of the social, environmental, political and economic challenges, benefits and impacts of various energy sources, developments and technologies. Critical energy literacy is grounded in critical and decolonising approaches to STEM education; considerations for collaborative multi-, inter- and Trans disciplinary pedagogy; critical place-based inquiry and pedagogy; critical gender perspectives and critical media literacy and engagement. Enhancing societal critical energy literacy will assist with more equitable energy, transit, construction and environmental planning by and for communities, businesses and governments. In this theory-building commentary, we share insights related to and principles for our emerging theory of critical energy literacy which coalesced through personal experience with and previous studies into related initiatives and areas of inquiry, and recent reviews of literature as well as K-12, post-secondary and not-for-profit curricula in Canada with consideration for international contexts. A discussion of renewable energy development and education focused on the Canadian province of Alberta is presented as an illuminating exemplar.

Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press


The Youth Strike for Climate brought important global attention to interconnected climate, energy and environmental issues. Inherent within considerations of climate change are the role of energy production, capture, consumption and related policies — highly technocratic areas of consideration. Youth in many areas of the world are more electronically connected and able to independently access climate change related and other environmental information via the internet and other sources than ever before. However, given the overwhelming volume of information currently available and the lack of regular access for some socioeconomically or otherwise marginalised youth to digital and/or non-digital learning resources, finding reliable sources of information regarding climate change, energy and environmental topics while making sense of associated dynamics are daunting challenges for the best of educators and most critically informed youth. As such, we propose that collaborative approaches to critical energy literacy between educators and learners in various community, school and post-secondary contexts will prove beneficial and supportive for youth engaging in related activism and advocacy.

The Youth Strike for ClimateFootnote 1 was a series of interconnected and iteratively inspired activist initiatives around the world that typically involved school aged youth (and other supporters) attending climate-related events, rather than school, on Fridays. The Youth Strike for Climate was initiated by Greta Thunberg, a Swedish secondary school student, in 2018, reached a peak of activities in 2019 and continues to inform related events and organisations today (e.g., see

In addition to providing a platform for raising global awareness of climate change and other related environmental issues, the Youth Strike for Climate revealed ongoing intersectional prejudices and injustices. For example, explicit and implicit gender violence was expressed by oil and gas industry advocates who created misogynistic imagery and discourse related to Greta Thunberg, founder of the Youth Strike for Climate, in an attempt to discredit the movement (CBC News, 2020). Such manifestations further emphasise well-established historical and contemporary links between extractive resource industries and gendered violence against Indigenous women and girls, in particular, in Canada (Awasis, Reference Awasis, Black, D’Arcy, Weis and Russell2014), Australia (Carrington et al., Reference Carrington, McIntosh and Scott2010), the United States (Lucchesi, Reference Lucchesi2019; Weber, Reference Weber, Geigle and Barkdull2014) and elsewhere. However, Indigenous women such as Winona LaDuke (Reference LaDuke, Black, D’Arcy, Weis and Russell2014) have also risen to become prominent leaders in the climate movement, community-based renewable energy development and related socioecological advocacy and activism.

We approach this theory-building commentary as university-based scholar educators in the Canadian province of Alberta, a well-known controversial centre of oil and gas extraction (Katz-Rosene, Reference Katz-Rosene2017), and promising context for renewable energy production (Kralovic & Mutysheva, Reference Kralovic and Mutysheva2006). This work grows out of previous activist initiatives and related research (Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2019; Lowan-Trudeau & Fowler, in press). Our sense from having participated in and/or supported the Youth Strike for Climate and other similar initiatives is that leaders and participants alike are building and expressing notable critical energy literacy while thinking about what’s next after/as a result of such activist initiatives. Associated questions arise such as, “What are we protesting not only against, but also towards? And how can we facilitate positive and critically informed long-term change?” In the following, we present critical energy literacy as one possible component of a solutions-oriented approach. We define critical energy literacy as an understanding of the social, environmental, political and economic challenges, benefits and impacts of various energy sources, developments and technologies.

Energy Literacy

Common definitions of energy literacy in both scholarly and government documents acknowledge the scientific, social and/or political aspects germane to understanding energy technologies and systems (e.g., Martins et al., Reference Martins, Madaleno and Dias2020; U.S. Department of Energy, 2017). In our review of energy literacy literature, we also encountered behavioural approaches to energy literacy aimed at encouraging pro-environmental actions as a result of enhanced energy literacy (e.g., DeWaters & Powers, Reference DeWaters and Powers2011). However, overtly critical energy perspectives that explicitly recognise interrelated societal and environmental inequities are somewhat elusive (Delgado, Reference Delgado2016).

For example, in a review of Canadian provincial and territorial curricula focused on critical and Indigenous environmental issues, we found that explicitly critical approaches to energy-related topics were notably lacking in most regions (Lowan-Trudeau & Fowler, in press). In a subsequent review of non-profit educational and post-secondary program descriptions and curricula, we found that, while more overtly critical energy perspectives that bring together the social, political and technical aspects of energy literacy are emerging in some programmes and organisations (e.g., see Carleton University’s Sustainable Energy graduate programs:, many still take a primarily technical/scientific approach. As such, this is an outstanding issue in the field with the potential for significant growth and transformation as has been persistently noted by energy education scholars (Jennings, Reference Jennings2009).

Moreover, we found that energy education programmes developed by independent non-profit groups such as the Toronto Renewable Energy Co-Operative (TREC;, an organisation that facilitates community-based renewable energy developments, often present more critical energy perspectives and intersectional voices reflective of environmental justice (Pellow, Reference Pellow2017), just sustainability (Agyeman, Reference Agyeman2008) and just transition (Newell & Mulvaney, Reference Newell and Mulvaney2013) paradigms than those that are closely affiliated with and/or funded by governments or the oil and gas industry. For example, Inside Education, a natural resource and environmentally oriented non-profit educational organisation in the province of Alberta — Canada’s oil and gas industry hub — lists both the Government of Alberta, a predominantly conservative and pro-fossil fuel entity and several oil and gas corporations, among others, as “partners” on their website (see Unsurprisingly, much of the energy related information that is shared as a potential resource for teachers and students presents a neutral or even supportive perspective on, for example, Alberta’s infamous oil/tar sands (e.g., These iterative insights led us to discuss and consider possibilities for more critical approaches to energy literacy.

Critical Energy Literacy

In consideration of the trends and dynamics described above, we propose critical energy literacy as an emerging theory that denotes critical understanding of the social, environmental, political and economic challenges, benefits and impacts of various energy sources, transportation technologies and construction technologies including, but not limited to wind, solar, passive, small- or large-scale hydro, tidal, geothermal, oil and gas, coal and nuclear. As a theory, critical energy literacy will assist with the articulation and exploration of the relationships between interrelated phenomena (Anfara & Mertz, Reference Anfara and Mertz2006).

Similar to related concepts with roots in critical theory such as critical media literacy (Kellner & Share, Reference Kellner, Share, Steinberg and Macedo2007; Robertson & Scheidler-Benns, Reference Robertson and Scheidler-Benns2016), critical energy literacy leads us to not only identify but also to challenge and strive to address intersectional inequities in society. For example, adopting a critical energy lens may assist in identifying the past, present or projected socioenvironmental impacts of or benefits for a marginalised community in relation to a given energy project. As such, critical energy literacy is resonant with, but distinguished from, similar concepts such as critical environmental justice (Pellow, Reference Pellow2017) and just sustainability (Agyeman, Reference Agyeman2008) by its specific focus on energy.

Facilitating critical energy literacy may prove challenging for educators at various levels in a range of contexts (K-12, post-secondary, community) tasked with fostering such understanding for their students, as they themselves may be more versed in certain areas of energy literacy than others (e.g., scientific/technical vs. social). In response, a small, but increasing number of educational resources and programmess for educators, grassroots community organisers and professionals working in science and/or policy settings have been developed to promote more comprehensive understanding of energy sources, challenges and possibilities.

Emerging principles of critical energy literacy

Reflective of the aforementioned dynamics and influences, critical energy literacy is theoretically framed by scholarship in the areas of critical and decolonising science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education; considerations for collaborative multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary pedagogy; critical place-based inquiry and pedagogy; critical gender perspectives and critical media literacy and engagement.

Critical approaches to STEM

Building on the foundational work of scholars such as Aikenhead and Ogawa (Reference Aikenhead and Ogawa2007) and Barnhardt and Kawagley (Reference Barnhardt and Kawagley2005), the growing field of critical STEM education provides key insights for critical energy literacy. For example, Bullock (Reference Bullock2017) rightly asks whether prioritising universal STEM education is indeed a remedy for socioeconomic disparity or simply a tool to further reinforce societal hierarchies. Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars alike are also considering the colonial connotations of conventional STEM research and education as well as alternative, decolonised paths forward (Bang & Medin, Reference Bang and Medin2010; Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2017). They also exhort educators and researchers to deeply consider the interconnection of critical social, environmental and technological phenomena (de Freitas et al., Reference de Freitas, Lupinacci and Pais2017).

Collaborative approaches

Important questions also arise in both educational and research contexts when considering how to best bring together disparate bodies of knowledge through multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary approaches (Bernstein, Reference Bernstein2015; Choi & Pak, Reference Choi and Pak2006). Reflective of similar models of cultural interaction such as multi, inter and transculturalism (Welsch, Reference Welsch, Featherstone and Lash1999), multi- and interdisciplinary approaches are based on the maintenance of disciplinary boundaries — multidisciplinary approaches promote sharing between knowledge systems for mutual consideration while interdisciplinary approaches go further to seek possible points of convergence or integration, but not hybridity (Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2015). Transdisciplinary approaches transcend disciplinary boundaries to create new hybrids that incorporate tailored elements from traditional fields (Bernstein, Reference Bernstein2015; Reid et al., Reference Reid, Greaves and Kirby2017). While multi- and interdisciplinary pedagogical approaches incorporate the breadth of knowledge of collaborating educators and their associated knowledge systems, transdisciplinary approaches require individual educators to acquire and foster focused depth of understanding by bringing together discrete fields in relation to a complex topic. As such, with consideration for the dynamics described above and in light of the experiences of those who have made initial attempts in the area of critical energy education (e.g., Henderson, Reference Henderson, Deer, Falkenberg, McMillan and Sims2014), a specific consideration for critical energy literacy is whether it is better to promote multi- or interdisciplinary collaboration between individual educators from discrete subject areas or to develop pre- and in-service training opportunities for a new group of individuals capable of serving as transdisciplinary energy educators. However, a dichotomous approach of this nature may be inappropriate with a more balanced solution lying somewhere along a multi-inter-transdisciplinary continuum.

Context and place

Considering the role of context and place in pedagogy and inquiry is also central to critical energy literacy. Greenwood’s (formerly Gruenewald) (Reference Gruenewald2003) early conception of a critical pedagogy of place exhorts educators to deeply consider their sociocultural, geographical and ecological contexts through concepts such as decolonisation and re-inhabitation while facilitating similarly critical consciousness for their students. Greenwood’s work has led to numerous responses, heated debate and a substantial amount of iterative scholarship that further incorporates concepts such as reconciliation (Bowers, Reference Bowers2008; Greenwood, Reference Greenwood2008; Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2017; Scully, Reference Scully2012; Stevenson, Reference Stevenson2008). Tuck and McKenzie (Reference Tuck and McKenzie2015) also critically consider place and encourage researchers to directly acknowledge and incorporate place and context in our work in connection with socioecological relationships and Indigenous topics in particular.

Critically considering and engaging with media

The central role of popular, social and digital media upon our collective awareness and understanding of various energy technologies (Brady & Monani, Reference Brady and Monani2012; Hodges & Stocking, Reference Hodges and Stocking2016; Walker & Christidis, Reference Walker and Christidis2018) is a salient consideration for critical energy literacy. As critical media literacy and environmental communication scholars emphasise, popular media in particular not only influences us — it may also explicitly and implicitly express the beliefs and perspectives of the journalist, publisher and/or broader societal context (Kellner & Share, Reference Kellner, Share, Steinberg and Macedo2007; Milstein et al., Reference Milstein, Pileggi and Morgan2017; Takahashi & Rosenthal, Reference Takahashi and Rosenthal2018). Moreover, critical assessment of environmentally related media also reveals opportunities to actively engage with popular, social and digital media in order to shift discourses and expand societal understanding of a given issue, whether energy related or otherwise (Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2019, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2021; Milstein et al., Reference Milstein, Pileggi and Morgan2017). For example, educators in a range of K-12, post-secondary or community contexts can facilitate energy-related critical media literacy exercises that prompt learners to consider the subtle or overt influences of a publisher, author or funder on a given media artefact (e.g., print, digital text, audiovisual) in seeking to identify implicit, explicit or null/missing (Eisner, Reference Eisner2002) messages and associated discourses therein.

Critically considering gender dynamics

Awareness and attention to gender dynamics is also germane to critical energy literacy. As noted by Maina-Okori et al. (Reference Maina-Okori, Koushik and Wilson2018), intersectional approaches that consider gender alongside other sociocultural factors such as age, ability, culture, language and ethnicity must be part of contemporary environmental education initiatives. A critical gender perspective leads us to question who is benefitting from a particular project or technology as well as who is leading, oppressing others or being oppressed themselves? Such an approach may also assist us in identifying and exploring gender roles and dynamics in various energy industries, developments and educational organisations — considering who is or isn’t assuming occupational or leadership roles (Pearl-Martinez & Stephens, Reference Pearl-Martinez and Stephens2016). For example, while keeping in mind historical and ongoing patriarchal dynamics within environmental activist and education contexts (Breunig & Russell, Reference Breunig and Russell2020) and the disproportionate impacts of climate change upon women globally (Gough & Whitehouse, Reference Gough and Whitehouse2020), an increasingly notable number of community-based environmental organisations are led by women (Kaplan, Reference Kaplan2019; Taylor, Reference Taylor2014). This dynamic is also reflected in the Youth Strikes for Climate movement which, as previously noted, was initiated by Greta Thunberg with many other young women taking the lead on regional initiatives (Kaplan, Reference Kaplan2019).

In the following section, we consider renewable energy development and education in the context of the Canadian province of Alberta as an illuminating exemplar of critical energy literacy.

Renewable Energy in Alberta, Canada

Amid growing concern regarding climate change, environmental degradation from non-renewable energy sources and fluctuating resource markets, renewable energy development has rapidly expanded across Canada and around the world — solar panels, windmills, geothermal wells and small-scale run-of-river hydroelectric generators have increasingly appeared across the Canadian landscape. Larger scale renewable energy projects by private corporations and governments typically replace non-renewable energy sources such as oil, gas and coal, but may not result in ostensibly noticeable effects upon the target population’s environmental awareness and energy use; for example, in Calgary — a city of approximately 1.3 million people in southern Alberta — many people may be completely unaware that their light rail transit (LRT) system, the CTrain, is entirely powered by energy drawn from large windmill installations in rural areas south of the city (Grieco, Reference Grieco2015). In contrast, smaller scale projects are typically intended to directly serve the needs of those in the immediately surrounding area while also providing increased economic, environmental and in the case of Indigenous communities, political sovereignty rooted in traditional environmental values and local geographical, meteorological and ecological knowledge (Bargh, Reference Bargh2010, Reference Bargh2012; Henderson, Reference Henderson2013; Hoicka & McArthur, Reference Hoicka and MacArthur2018; Lipp et al., Reference Lipp, Tarhan and Dixon2016). Given immediately visible changes to the surrounding landscape and infrastructure, community members are commonly more aware of such initiatives.

An emerging group of educators in a range of community, school and post-secondary contexts in Alberta and beyond are attempting to respond to such trends by providing students with both technically and critically informed information related to renewable energy through a variety of pedagogical strategies (Henderson, Reference Henderson, Deer, Falkenberg, McMillan and Sims2014; Jennings, Reference Jennings2009; Jennings & Lund, Reference Jennings and Lund2001; Liarakou et al., Reference Liarakou, Gavrilakis and Flouri2009). Although some educators must rely upon theoretical information, classroom-friendly micro models, and examples of projects in relatively distant locales, an increasing number of K-12 schools, post-secondary institutions, non-profit organisations and Indigenous communities are developing in situ renewable energy installations which both serve their electrical needs and provide experiential, place-based teaching and learning opportunities for educators and students alike.

For example, 36 schools in Alberta benefited from a funding initiative by the previous New Democratic Party (NDP) government to install solar panels and other renewable energy technologies on their roofs and surrounding grounds (Government of Alberta, 2016). Installations of this nature provide experiential learning opportunities for educators and students. For instance, some schools have ensured that digital readings from the solar panels or similar are prominently displayed so that students can observe the energy produced in real time (Max, Reference Max2018). The long-term benefits of schools offsetting not only environmental but also economic costs through such installations are also being recognised by communities such as Wetaskiwin in central Alberta (Max, Reference Max2018). Taken together, these dynamics provide strong opportunities for educators to engage their students in technically as well as critically oriented activities and discussions. As such, in situ installations offer a wide array of learning opportunities.

Elsewhere, T’Souke First Nation on Vancouver Island in neighbouring British Columbia is a recognised leader in community-based renewable energy development; extensive solar panel installations have allowed the community to gain increased energy, economic and environmental sovereignty while creating in situ renewable energy-related learning and training opportunities for youth and other community members that support, reflect and extend the community’s traditional environmental values (CBC News 2020; Kimmett, Reference Kimmett2009; Ozog, Reference Ozog2012). T’Souke First Nation’s successes have inspired Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities and governments across British Columbia (Ozog, Reference Ozog2012) and the rest of Canada with similar projects arising more recently in Alberta through a now defunct funding initiative that was also introduced by the previous NDP government (Government of Alberta, 2018; Wilt, Reference Wilt2018).

Despite such promising developments, the combined social, political, ecological and technical aspects of renewable energy development (Jaffar, Reference Jaffar2015) present significant challenges for interested educators who may be grounded in one relevant disciplinary area, but not another (Henderson, Reference Henderson, Deer, Falkenberg, McMillan and Sims2014; Kandpal & Broman, Reference Kandpal and Broman2014; Liarakou et al., Reference Liarakou, Gavrilakis and Flouri2009). For example, while a science educator may be familiar with the technical and ecological aspects of solar, wind or geothermal power, they might struggle with social or political considerations such as government policies regulating whether or not individuals or communities can be reimbursed for excess power generated by their installation that is directed back into the electrical grid — a process commonly known as feed-in-tariffing (FIT) or reverse metering (Stokes, Reference Stokes2013). Conversely, social science educators may be interested and well versed in the sociopolitical aspects of renewable energy initiatives but lacking in technical or environmental expertise.

In consideration of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action (2015) and other educational mandates such as the Association of Canadian Deans of Education Accord on Indigenous Education (2010) and Alberta’s new Teaching Quality Standards (2018) which emphasise Indigenous perspectives, educators might also be interested in exploring the recent rise of renewable energy developments by Indigenous communities across Canada (Henderson, Reference Henderson2013; Krupa et al., Reference Krupa, Galbraith and Burch2015; Laboucan-Massimo, Reference Laboucan Massimo, Christian and Wong2017; Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2019; Ozog, Reference Ozog2012) with their students. However, as documented by Greg’s research in this area (Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2019), such educators may find themselves lacking in relevant cultural awareness and an adequate understanding of associated Indigenous political, economic, land and environmental rights.

Cultural, political and geographical contexts are key considerations for renewable energy educators. For example, the province of Alberta provides a particularly interesting base from which to conduct this inquiry. Geographically, in arguable contrast to its reputation as a centre of oil and gas development, Alberta is recognised as a region well suited to renewable energy development due to its natural abundance of wind, sunshine and rivers descending from the Rocky Mountains (Kralovic & Mutysheva, Reference Kralovic and Mutysheva2006). Politically, amidst a shift from the longstanding rule of the Progressive Conservative Party to the NDP in 2015, and subsequent return to a conservative government in 2019, support for non-renewable energy sources was maintained. However, similar to the federal (Government of Canada, 2015) and other provincial governments (Province of British Columbia 2015; Independent Energy System Operator, 2018), Alberta’s NDP government established significant funds to support the previously mentioned renewable energy initiatives by Indigenous communities (Government of Alberta, 2018; Wilt, Reference Wilt2018) and solar power installations on 36 public school sites (Government of Alberta, 2016). This is especially notable due to the recent crash in oil prices that resulted in widespread job losses in Alberta along with a desire on the part of many in the oil and gas industry to refocus their skills in more sustainable fields (McGarvey, Reference McGarvey2017). Such trends may also introduce opportunities for assessing and addressing gender diversity, or lack thereof, in Alberta’s energy industries (Pearl-Martinez & Stephens, Reference Pearl-Martinez and Stephens2016).

Youth in Alberta have also been proactive in building societal critical energy literacy through climate and renewable energy-related advocacy and activism. For example, Student Energy was formed in Calgary in 2009 by a trio of students at Mount Royal University ( It has since expanded to include chapters across Canada and internationally with a consistent focus on climate and energy justice.

Despite or perhaps due to the aforementioned political changes, socio-economic trends and geographical positioning, environmental education scholars Jickling (Reference Jickling2003) and Niblett (Reference Niblett2008) might suggest that critical energy educators in Alberta must remain prepared to address lingering tensions between those supportive of conventional energy and those more interested in renewables. With the shift back to a conservative government in 2019, this is a particularly interesting time to consider such dynamics.

It is also important to acknowledge that renewable energy developments are not problem-free solutions that will solve all of the planet’s climate, pollution and socio-economic injustice woes without certain impacts. A range of interconnected social, economic, political, technical, health and ecological challenges have also arisen (Bargh, Reference Bargh2010; Richards, Noble & Belcher, Reference Richards, Noble and Belcher2012; Stokes, Reference Stokes2013) along with debates regarding, for example, the impact of large windmills on birds and human health (Liarakou et al., Reference Liarakou, Gavrilakis and Flouri2009; van der Horst, Reference van der Horst2007; Walker & Christidis, Reference Walker and Christidis2018). Some might also advocate for both pursuing renewable energy development and reducing general energy dependency as the best way forward (Lowan-Trudeau, Reference Lowan-Trudeau2019).

The grassroots efforts of individuals and smaller community groups in a variety of geographic and economic contexts must also be considered in relation to varying regional, provincial and federal policies guiding or impeding renewable energy development and implementation (Hoicka and McArthur, Reference Hoicka and MacArthur2018). Compounding the aforementioned challenges is the fact that critical renewable energy education is a distinctly underexplored area of both research and practice (Jennings, Reference Jennings2009), leaving educators with limited guidance, technical training and networking opportunities. As such, it is a key area that may be better understood if approached through a lens of critical energy literacy.


Developed through consideration of the dynamics presented throughout this article both related to and extending beyond the Youth Strike for Climate, we proposed critical energy literacy as an emerging theory that denotes understanding of the social, environmental, political and economic challenges, benefits and impacts of various energy sources, developments and technologies. Our discussion of critical energy literacy was further grounded in critical and decolonising approaches to STEM education; considerations for collaborative multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary pedagogy; critical place-based inquiry and pedagogy; critical gender perspectives and critical media literacy and engagement. Enhancing societal critical energy literacy will assist with more equitable energy, transit, construction and environmental planning by and for communities, businesses and governments. In this article, we shared insights related to and principles for critical energy literacy based on recent reviews of literature as well as K-12, post-secondary and not-for-profit curricula in Canada with consideration for Indigenous, non-Indigenous and international contexts. Our discussion of energy development, education and critical energy literacy focused on the socioenvironmentally complex Canadian province of Alberta as an illuminating exemplar.

The Youth Strike for Climate brought important sustained attention to issues of energy and environmental justice across Canada and around the world. As educational scholars, we must recognise, make space for and seek opportunities to support, collaborate with and learn from youth who are continuing with this important work through advocacy, activism and education. We continue to refine our emerging theory of critical energy literacy and related considerations through ongoing interviews with critical energy educators across Canada; future research that engages more directly with youth perspectives on and experiences with developing critical energy literacy would also prove insightful. We look forward to further opportunities for scholarship and practice.


This work was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada Insight Grant (#435-2019-0238).



The online version of this article has been updated since original publication. A notice detailing the change has also been published

1 Also called the School Strike for Climate, Fridays for Future, and Skolstrejk för klimatet, among other terms (Verlie & Flynn, Reference Verlie and Flynn2020).


Agyeman, J. (2008). Toward a ‘just’sustainability? Continuum, 22, 751756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikenhead, G.S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberta Education. (2018). Teaching quality standard. Retrieved September 12, 2018 from Google Scholar
Anfara, V.A., & Mertz, N.T. (Eds.) (2006). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Canadian Deans of Education. (2010). Accord on Indigenous education. Retrieved September 26, 2018 from Google Scholar
Awasis, S. (2014). Pipelines and resistance across Turtle Island. In Black, T., D’Arcy, S., Weis, T., & Russell, J. Kahn (Eds.) A line in the Tar Sands (pp. 253266). Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 10081026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, M. (2010). Indigenous peoples’ energy projects. Australasian Canadian Studies Journal, 28, 130. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Bargh, M. (2012). Rethinking and re-shaping indigenous economies: Māori geothermal energy enterprises. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 6, 271283. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A.O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36, 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, J.H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11, 120.Google Scholar
Bowers, C.A. (2008). Why a critical pedagogy of place is an oxymoron. Environmental Education Research, 14, 325335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, M.J., & Monani, S. (2012). Wind power! Marketing renewable energy on tribal lands and the struggle for just sustainability. Local Environment, 17, 147166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breunig, M., & Russell, C. (2020). Long-term impacts of two secondary school environmental studies programs on environmental behaviour: The shadows of patriarchy and neoliberalism. Environmental Education Research, 26, 701715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, E.C. (2017). Only STEM can save us? Examining race, place, and STEM education as property. Educational Studies, 53, 628641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, K., McIntosh, A., Scott, J. (2010). Globalization, frontier masculinities and violence: Booze, blokes and brawls. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 393413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBC News. (2020, February 27). ‘This shows we are winning’: Greta Thunberg responds after sexually graphic illustration surfaces on Facebook. CBC News. Google Scholar
Choi, B.C.K., & Pak, A.W.P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. Medecine Clinique Et Experimentale, 29, 351364.Google ScholarPubMed
de Freitas, E., Lupinacci, J., & Pais, A. (2017). Science and technology studies × educational studies: Critical and creative perspectives on the future of STEM education. Educational Studies, 53, 551559. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, E. (2016). Energy geographies: Thinking critically about energy issues in the classroom. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40, 3954. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWaters, J.E., & Powers, S.E. (2011). Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior. Energy Policy, 39, 16991710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisner, E. (2002). Educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Hoboken: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gough, A., & Whitehouse, H. (2020). Challenging amnesias: Re-collecting feminist new materialism/ecofeminism/climate/education. Environmental Education Research, 26, 14201434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Alberta. (2016). Solar panels to be featured in Alberta’s new schools. Retrieved July 31, 2018 from Google Scholar
Government of Alberta. (2018). Alberta Indigenous green energy program. Retrieved July 31, 2018 from Google Scholar
Government of Canada. (2015). ecoEnergy for Aboriginal and northern communities program. Retrieved June 1, 2015 from Google Scholar
Greenwood, D.A. (2008). A critical pedagogy of place: From gridlock to parallax. Environmental Education Research, 14, 336348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, M. (2015). Poverty mapping and sustainable transport: A neglected dimension. Research in Transportation Economics, 51, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenewald, D.A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32, 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C. (2013). Aboriginal power: Clean energy and the future of Canada’s First Peoples. Erin, ON: Rainforest Editions.Google Scholar
Henderson, M. (2014). Solar-powered learning: Educating for an ecological literacy. In Deer, F., Falkenberg, T., McMillan, B., & Sims, L. (Eds.) Sustainable well-being: Concepts, issues, and educational practices (pp. 95104). Winnipeg, MB: ESWB Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, H.E., & Stocking, G. (2016). A pipeline of tweets: Environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline. Environmental Politics, 25, 223247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoicka, C.E., & MacArthur, J.L. (2018). From tip to toes: Mapping community energy models in Canada and New Zealand. Energy Policy, 121, 162174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independent Energy System Operator. (2018). Indigenous communities in Ontario’s energy sector. Retrieved September 12, 2018 from Google Scholar
Jaffar, A. (2015). Establishing a clean economy or strengthening Indigenous sovereignty: Conflicting & complementary narratives for energy transitions. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Jennings, P. (2009). New directions in renewable energy education. Renewable Energy, 34, 435439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, P., & Lund, C. (2001). Renewable energy education for sustainable development. Renewable Energy, 22, 113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jickling, B. (2003). Environmental education and advocacy: Revisited. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandpal, T.C., & Broman, L. (2014). Renewable energy education: A global status review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 300324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2019, September 24). Teen girls are leading the climate strikes and helping change the face of environmentalism. The Washington Post. Google Scholar
Katz-Rosene, R.M. (2017). From narrative of promise to rhetoric of sustainability: A genealogy of oil sands. Environmental Communication, 11, 401414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007). Critical media literacy, democracy, and the reconstruction of education. In Steinberg, S. & Macedo, D. (Eds.) Media literacy: A reader (pp. 323.). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kimmett, C. (2009, 24 July). First Nation takes lead on solar power. The Google Scholar
Kralovic, P., & Mutysheva, D. (2006). The role of renewable energy in Alberta’s energy future. Calgary, AB: Alberta Energy Futures Project, Institute for Sustainable Energy and Economy, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Krupa, J., Galbraith, L., & Burch, S. (2015). Participatory and multi-level governance: Applications to Aboriginal renewable energy projects. Local Environment, 20, 81101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laboucan Massimo, M. (2017). Chapter 7: From our homelands to the tar sands. In Christian, D. & Wong, R. (Eds.) Downstream: Reimagining water (pp. 81–88). Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier Press.Google Scholar
LaDuke, W. (2014). Ending the age of fossil fuels and building an economics for the Seventh Generation. In Black, T., D’Arcy, S., Weis, T., Russell, J. Kahn (Eds.) A line in the Tar Sands (pp. 229239). Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Liarakou, G., Gavrilakis, C., & Flouri, E. (2009). Secondary school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 120129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipp, J., Tarhan, M.D., & Dixon, A. (2016). Accelerating renewable energy cooperatives in Canada: A review of experiences and lessons. Toronto, ON: TREC Renewable Energy Co-Operative.Google Scholar
Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2015). From bricolage to métissage: (Re)thinking intercultural approaches to Indigenous environmental education and research. Peter Lang. [Volume #8 in (Re)thinking Environmental Education, C. Russell & J. Dillon (Series Eds.)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2017). Indigenous environmental education: The case of renewable energy projects. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 53, 601613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2019). Protest as pedagogy: Teaching, learning, and Indigenous environmental movements. Peter Lang. [Volume #13 in (Re)thinking Environmental Education, C. Russell & J. Dillon (Series Eds.)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2021). Indigenous environmental media coverage in Canada and the United States: A comparative critical discourse analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 52, 8397. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1852525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowan-Trudeau, G., & Fowler, T.A. (in press). Considering Indigenous environmental issues in Canadian curricula: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies.Google Scholar
Lucchesi, A.H. (2019). Mapping geographies of Canadian colonial occupation: Pathway analysis of murdered Indigenous women and girls. Gender, Place & Culture, 26, 868887. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1553864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maina-Okori, N.M., Koushik, J.R., & Wilson, A. (2018). Reimagining intersectionality in environmental and sustainability education: A critical literature review. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49, 286296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, A., Madaleno, M., & Dias, M.F. (2020). Energy literacy: What is out there to know? Energy Reports, 6, 454459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max, C. (2018). Using the sun to power WRPS schools. The Wetaskiwin Times. Google Scholar
McGarvey, D. (2017, November 3). Renewable energy jobs provide new opportunities for Alberta workers. CBC News. Retrieved July 31, 2018 from Google Scholar
Milstein, T., Pileggi, M., & Morgan, E.L. (Eds.). (2017). Environmental communication pedagogy and practice. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179, 132140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niblett, B. (2008). Appreciative resistance: Balancing activism and respect. Pathways: The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 20, 47.Google Scholar
Ozog, S. (2012). Towards First Nations energy self-sufficiency: Analyzing the renewable energy partnership between Tsou-ke Nation and Skidegate Band. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC.Google Scholar
Pearl-Martinez, R., & Stephens, J.C. (2016). Toward a gender diverse workforce in the renewable energy transition. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 12, 815.Google Scholar
Pellow, D.N. (2017). What is critical environmental justice? Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Province of British Columbia. (2015). First Nations clean energy business fund. Retrieved June 1, 2015 from Google Scholar
Reid, C., Greaves, L., & Kirby, S.L. (2017). Experience, research, social change: Critical methods (3rd Ed.). Toronto: U of T Press.Google Scholar
Richards, G., Noble, B., & Belcher, K. (2012). Barriers to renewable energy development: A case study of large-scale wind energy in Saskatchewan, Canada. Energy Policy, 42, 691698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, L., & Scheidler-Benns, J. (2016). Critical media literacy as a transformative pedagogy. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 7, 22472253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, A. (2012). Decolonization, reinhabitation and reconciliation: Aboriginal and place-based education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 17, 148158.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (2008). A critical pedagogy of place and the critical place(s) of pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 14, 353360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, L.C. (2013). The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada. Energy Policy, 56, 490500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, B., & Rosenthal, S. (Eds.). (2018). Environmental communication among minority populations. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D.E. (2014). The state of diversity in environmental organizations. Green 2.0. Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Winnipeg: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Relational validity and the ‘where’ of inquiry: Place and Land in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 633638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. (2017). Energy literacy framework. Retrieved February 1, 2021 from Google Scholar
van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy, 35, 27052714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verlie, B., & Flynn, A. (2020). Call for papers: Special issue: Striking from school for the climate. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 15. Google Scholar
Walker, C., & Christidis, T. (2018). Activists against research: Experiences studying wind energy in Ontario. The Canadian Geographer, 62, 282287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, B.A., Geigle, J., & Barkdull, C. (2014). Rural North Dakota’s oil boom and its impact on social services. Journal of Social Work, 59, 6272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsch, W. (1999). Transculturality- the puzzling form of cultures today. In Featherstone, M. & Lash, S., (Eds.), Spaces of culture: City, nation, world (pp. 194213). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilt, J. (2018). How solar power is helping redefine this Alberta First Nation. The Narwhal, Retrieved January 9, 2018 from Google Scholar