This article has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
Largent, Emily A.
Snodgrass, Richard T.
Blinding as a Solution to Bias.
Is Consumer Culture Theory research or realpolitik? A sociology of knowledge analysis of a scientific culture.
Journal of Consumer Behaviour,
Opportunity from crisis: a common agenda for higher education and science, technology and innovation policy research.
Studies in Higher Education,
Peer Review and the Dilemmas of Quality Control in Programme Accreditation in South African Higher Education: Challenges and Possibilities.
Higher Education Policy,
Researchers as evaluators: tasks, tensions and politics.
Taylor, C. R.
Subjective Performance and the Value of Blind Evaluation.
The Review of Economic Studies,
Mas-Ruiz, Francisco José
Evaluation bias against work in progress: evidence from a Spanish marketing conference.
Gate-keepers or judges: peer reviews in construction management.
Construction Management and Economics,
Armstrong, J. Scott
Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Planet Earth–A Geographer's Perspective.
Journal of Geography,
Singer, Benjamin D.
The Criterial Crisis of the Academic World.
ELLIS, P. M.
MELLSOP, G. W.
PEACE, K. A.
WILSON, J. M.
Peer review as an aid to improving the completeness of psychiatric case notes.
Boots, Sharon G.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Brady, John Paul
Journal referees: Gatekeepers of science.
The Costs of Schizophrenia.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,