Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 15
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Largent, Emily A. and Snodgrass, Richard T. 2016. Blinding as a Solution to Bias.

    Ostergaard, Per and Bode, Matthias 2016. Is Consumer Culture Theory research or realpolitik? A sociology of knowledge analysis of a scientific culture. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, p. n/a.

    Jacob, Merle and Hellström, Tomas 2014. Opportunity from crisis: a common agenda for higher education and science, technology and innovation policy research. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 39, Issue. 8, p. 1321.

    Cross, Michael and Naidoo, Devika 2011. Peer Review and the Dilemmas of Quality Control in Programme Accreditation in South African Higher Education: Challenges and Possibilities. Higher Education Policy, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 517.

    Langfeldt, Liv and Kyvik, Svein 2011. Researchers as evaluators: tasks, tensions and politics. Higher Education, Vol. 62, Issue. 2, p. 199.

    Taylor, C. R. and Yildirim, H. 2011. Subjective Performance and the Value of Blind Evaluation. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 78, Issue. 2, p. 762.

    Calderón-Martínez, Aurora Ruiz-Conde, Enar Parreño-Selva, Josefa and Mas-Ruiz, Francisco José 2010. Evaluation bias against work in progress: evidence from a Spanish marketing conference. Higher Education, Vol. 60, Issue. 4, p. 395.

    RUNESON, GORAN and LOOSEMORE, MARTIN 1999. Gate-keepers or judges: peer reviews in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 529.

    Armstrong, J. Scott 1997. Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 63.

    1990. Planet Earth–A Geographer's Perspective. Journal of Geography, Vol. 89, Issue. 3, p. 133.

    Singer, Benjamin D. 1989. The Criterial Crisis of the Academic World. Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 127.

    ELLIS, P. M. MELLSOP, G. W. PEACE, K. A. and WILSON, J. M. 1987. Peer review as an aid to improving the completeness of psychiatric case notes. Medical Education, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 493.

    Boots, Sharon G. 1986. Editorial. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 75, Issue. 2, p. 221.

    Brady, John Paul 1985. Journal referees: Gatekeepers of science. Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 20, Issue. 8, p. 823.

    Hall, W. Andrews, G. and Goldstein, G. 1985. The Costs of Schizophrenia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 3.


Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science

  • David F. Horrobin (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2010
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. H. Abelson (1979) Problems of science faculties (editorial). Science 204:133. [CM]

American Psychological Association (1980) Summary report of journal operations for 1979. American Psychologist 35:575. [taDPP]

J. S. Armstrong (1980b) Unintelligible management research and academic prestige. Interfaces 10:8086. [JSA]

J. J. Bartko (1966) The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports 19:311. [GJW]

Y. Brackbill & F. Korton (1970) Journal reviewing practices: Authors' and APA members' suggestions for revision. American Psychologist 25:937–40. [taDPP]

W. J. Broad (1980a) Imbroglio at Yale. 1. Emergence of a fraud. Science 210:38–11. [DdB]

W. J. Broad (1981b) Fraud and the structure of science. Science 212:137–41. [DdB, CM]

W. J. Broad (1981c) The publishing game: Getting more for less. Science 211:1137–39. [DdB]

U. Bronfenbrenner (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist 32:513–31. [taDPP]

D. E. Chubin (1980) Competence is not enough. Contemporary Sociology 9:204–7. [DEC, CM]

S. Cole ; J. R. Cole & G. A. Simon (1981) Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 214:881–86. [Ed., rDPP]

S. Cole ; L. Rubin & J. R. Cole (1977) Peer review and the support of science. Scientific American 237:34–11. [RTL, CM]

W. M. Cox & V. Catt (1977) Productivity ratings of graduate programs in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist 32:793813. [taDPP]

R. Crandall (1978b) The relationship between quantity and quality of publications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4:379–80. [RC]

J. M. Davidson & R. J. Davidson , eds. (1980) The psychobiology of consciousness. New York: Plenum. [MJM]

W. D. Garvey & B. C. Griffith (1964) Scientific information exchange in psychology. Science 146:1655–59. [BCG]

W. D. Garvey & B. C. Griffith (1971) Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologist 26:349–62. [DdB, BCG, taDPP]

W. Garvey ; N. Lin & C. Nelson (1970) Communication in the physical and social sciences. Science 170:1166–73. [BCG]

J. C. Gibbs (1979) The meaning of ecologically oriented inquiry in contemporary psychology. American Psychologist 34:127–40. [taDPP]

W. O. Hagstrom (1974) Competition in science. American Sociological Review 39:118. [CM]

S. Harnad (1979) Creative disagreement. Sciences 19:1820. [DVC, Ed., WMH, taDPP]

R. G. Hawkins ; L. S. Ritter & I. Walter (1973) What economists think of their journals. Journal of Political Economy 81:1017–32. [JSA]

D. F. Horrobin (1974) Referees and research administrators: Barriers to scientific research? British Medical Journal 2:216–18. [CM]

J. Hall (1979) Author review of reviewers. American Psychologist 34:798. [taDPP, GJW]

C. Hendrick (1976) Editorial comment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2:207–8. [GJW]

C. Hendrick (1977) Editorial comment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 3:12. [taDPP]

R. J. Herrnstein (1977) Doing what comes naturally: A reply to Professor Skinner. American Psychologist 32:1013–16. [taDPP]

C. Holden (1979) Ethics and social science research. Science 206:357–340. [rDPP]

C. Holden (1980) Not what you know, but where you're from. Science 209:1097. [SP]

A. C. Leopold (1978) The act of creation: Creative processes in science. BioScience 28:436–40. [CM]

L. S. Lewis (1972) Academic freedom cases and their disposition. Change 4:8, 77. [CM]

R. B. McCall (1977) Challenges to a science of developmental psychology. Child Development 48:333–44. [taDPP]

F. J. McGuigan (1968) Experimental psychology: A methodological approach. 2d ed.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. [BM]

P. McReynolds (1971) Reliability of ratings of research papers. American Psychologist 26:400–101. [DP, taDPP]

C. Manwell & C. M. A. Baker (1979) The double helix: Science and myth in the act of creation. BioScience 29:742–46. [CM]

I. I. Mitroff & D. E. Chubin (1979) Peer review at NSF: A dialectical policy analysis. Social Studies of Science 9:199232. [DEC, CM]

J. R. Ravetz (1981) Avoiding fraud (correspondence). Nature 291:7. [CM]

A. Rosenblatt & S. A. Kirk (1980) Recognition of authors in blind review of manuscripts. Journal of Social Service Research 3:383–94. [tarDPP]

J. A. Rowney & T. J. Zenisek (1980) Manuscript characteristics influencing reviewers' decisions. Canadian Psychology 21:1721. [DP]

J. P. Rushton & H. L. Roediger (1978) An evaluation of 80 psychology journals based on the Science Citation Index. American Psychologist 33:520–23. [taDPP]

T. Saracevic (1975) Relevance: A review and framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 26:321–13. [BCG]

S. Scarr & B. L. R. Weber (1978) The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist. American Psychologist 33:935. [tarDPP, GJW, JCW]

J. J. Siegfried (1970) A first lesson in econometrics. Jottrnal of Political Economy 78:1378–79. [JSA]

M. J. White & K. G. White (1977) Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist 32:301–5. [tarDPP, MJW]

L. Wolin (1962) Responsibility for raw data. American Psychologist 17:657–58. [JSA]

W. Yoels (1974) The structure of scientific fields and the allocation of editorship on scientific journals: Some observations on the politics of knowledge. Sociological Quarterly 15:264–76. [JMB]

D. S. Zinberg (1976) Education through science: The early stages of career development in chemistry. Social Studies of Science 6:215–46. [CM]

H. Zuckerman (1970) Stratification in American science. Sociological Inquiry 40:235–57. [taDPP]

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *