Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:43:15.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Status of the Polynesian Megapode Megapodius pritchardii on Niuafo'ou (Tonga)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Ann Göth
Nockspitzweg 12, 6091 Gotzens, Austria
Uwe Vogel
Arbeitsgruppe für Verhaltensforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44 801 Bochum, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From October 1991 to January 1993, the Polynesian Megapode or Malau Megapodius pritchardii on the island Niuafo'ou, Kingdom of Tonga, was studied as part of a conservation project. The reproductive population was estimated at 188–235 pairs. Owing to an apparent lack of juveniles, the total population is not expected to be much larger. Compared to previous assessments this estimate gives evidence for a serious decline, but the methodologies used in all estimates differ considerably. However, a decline is also indicated by the fact that two of the 11 communal nesting grounds have been abandoned since 1979, while no new sites have been reported. Additionally, the Malau has disappeared from the vicinity of villages during the last 15 years. On a cat-free and undisturbed islet in the crater lake the density of Malaus is 1.29 pairs per ha. In other areas, where access for humans, dogs and cats was easy, the density of the Malau was only 0.16 pairs per ha. The main reason for the decline isover-harvesting of eggs by the local people. Habitat destruction or degradation are not responsible, and rats and domestic pigs seem to have no negative influence.

Research Article
Copyright © Birdlife International 1995


Anon. (1991) Population census in the Kingdom of Tonga 1986. Nuku'alofa (Tonga): Statistics Department.Google Scholar
Atkinson, I. A. E. (1985) The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effects on island avifaunas. Pp. 3581 in Moors, P. J. ed. Conservation of island birds. Cambridge, U.K.: International Council for Bird Preservation (Techn. Publ. 3).Google Scholar
Broome, L. S., Bishop, K. D. and Anderson, D. R. (1984) Population density and habitat use by Megapodius freycinet eremita in West New Britain. Austral. Wildl. Res. 11: 161171.Google Scholar
Dekker, R. W. R. J. (1989) Predation and western limits of megapode distribution. J. Biogeogr. 16: 317321.Google Scholar
Garson, P. J. (1993) Galliform conservation spreadsheet. Megapode Newsl. 7: 68.Google Scholar
Jaggar, T. A. (1931) Geology and geography of Niuafo'ou Volcano. Volcano Letter 318: 13.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N. (1988) Hatching success of the Australian Brush-turkey in south east Queensland. Emu 88: 260263.Google Scholar
Richard, J.-J. (1962) Catalogue of the active volcanoes of the world including solfatara fields. Rome: International Association for Volcanology.Google Scholar
Rinke, D. (1986) Notes on the avifauna of Niuafo'ou Island, Kingdom of Tonga. Emu 86: 8286.Google Scholar
Rinke, D. (1991) Birds of ‘Ata and Late, and additional notes on the avifauna of Niu-afo’ou, Kingdom of Tonga. Notornis 38: 131151.Google Scholar
Rinke, D. (1994) The Malau on Fonualei in northern Tonga. WPA News 44: 78.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. (1986) The fire has jumped: eyewitness accounts of the eruption and evacuation of Niuafo'ou, Tonga. Suva (Fiji): Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific.Google Scholar
Steadman, D. W. (1989) Extinctions of birds in eastern Polynesia: a review of the record, and comparison with other Pacific Islands. J. Arch. Sci. 16: 177205.Google Scholar
Steadman, D. W. (1993) Biogeography of Tongan birds before and after human impact. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. 90: 818822.Google Scholar
Todd, D. M. (1983) Pritchard's megapode on Niuafo'ou Island, Kingdom of Tonga. World Pheasant Assoc. J. 8: 6988.Google Scholar
Weir, D. G. (1973) Status and habits of Megapodius pritchardii. Wilson Bull. 85: 7982.Google Scholar