Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The neurology-psychiatry divide: a thought experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Thomas J. Reilly
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

Diseases of the brain are generally classified as either neurological or psychiatric. However, these two groups of illnesses cannot be readily separated on the basis of pathophysiology or symptomatology. It is difficult to rationally explain to someone with no prior frame of reference why we have the split between neurological and psychiatric illness. This demonstrates that the division is untenable, which has implications for training in both psychiatry and neurology.

Type
Special Article
Creative Commons
This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Author

Can the distinction between psychiatric and neurological illness be explained to a Martian? This hypothetical Martian has come down to Earth and wants to know about our classification of diseases pertaining to the brain. Let us suppose our Martian has similar anatomy and biology to humans, except he has no concept of illnesses relating to the central nervous system; he does not experience psychiatric or neurological disease. The Martian is curious as to why most organs (such as lungs, kidneys, hearts and eyes) are treated by a single medical specialty, whereas the brain is divided between neurologists and psychiatrists.

Convention

Perhaps a reasonable place to start would be to define neurological illnesses as those treated by neurologists and psychiatric illnesses as those treated by psychiatrists. You might take the Martian to a neurology ward and declare that all patients here have neurological illnesses. Or explain that the people seen by community psychiatric nurses are those with psychiatric illness. Of course, this is circular reasoning and does not stand up to much scrutiny. The Martian would surely not be satisfied by this explanation; he has no prior knowledge of the history, development or social implications of psychiatry v. neurological disease. Therefore, to him, the division is not self-evident.

Neuropathology

You might, therefore, go a little deeper and start to think about what characterises each type of illness. The Martian recognises the notion of pathology and can relate this to other aspects of disease – for example, pulmonary fibrosis causing restrictive lung disease, which we categorise as a respiratory disease. By comparison, you might argue that neuropathological lesions cause neurological disease, whereas psychiatric illness is more to do with abnormal function of the brain. This seems sensible and certainly holds for well-characterised neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis. Demyelination of neuronal axons is the neuropathology, which results in a patient’s symptoms. However, it becomes less tenable as the underlying disease processes are less well characterised. Epilepsy was once regarded as a psychiatric disease. As its neuropathology was better understood, we now regard it as a neurological illness. Reference Reynolds and Trimble1 Similarly, we now know of pathological processes in diseases such as schizophrenia. These processes, while not localised lesions, are evident when comparing brain imaging of people with schizophrenia to healthy controls and are present before the illness manifests clinically. Reference Fusar-Poli, Radua, McGuire and Borgwardt2

The final nail in the coffin of classifying brain diseases by their pathology is the case of conversion disorder, or neurologically unexplained symptoms. By definition, this disorder cannot be explained by underlying neuropathology. Reference Kanaan, Armstrong, Barnes and Wessely3 It is, presumably, a result of psychological and social factors and is more a ‘functional’ disorder of the central nervous system. And yet it is not treated by psychiatrists but by neurologists. Attempting to categorise brain disease by pathology is clearly troublesome so perhaps we should focus on dividing illnesses based on their symptoms.

Symptomatology

You could try explaining to the Martian that there are ‘neurological symptoms’, weakness, tingling and seizures, for example. By contrast, ‘psychiatric symptoms’ would generally be regarded as dysfunction of higher functions of the nervous system, disturbance in mood, delusions, hallucinations and so forth. Of course, there is some overlap but neurological symptoms would generally signify neurological disease which would interest a neurologist more than a psychiatrist. This holds true for conversion disorder which, although not involving lesions of the nervous system, certainly presents with symptoms more familiar to neurologists.

Unfortunately, it would take little time for our Martian friend to pick holes in this argument. He could point to anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis, which can be clinically indistinguishable from the first episode of schizophrenia, though it has a well-defined ‘neurological’ pathophysiology. Reference Barry, Hardiman, Healy, Keogan, Moroney and Molnar4 This disease was only recently discovered, making it difficult to estimate how many patients presenting with psychiatric symptoms actually have neurological diseases. Similarly, psychiatric symptoms are common in traditionally neurological disorders: hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease Reference Williams and Lees5 and depression in multiple sclerosis Reference Feinstein6 are just two examples.

The biopsychosocial approach

It could be argued that psychiatrists are specifically trained to have a biopsychosocial approach to disease, paying more attention to psychological and social aspects. Reference Engel7 This is important, as these factors influence the presentation and course of psychiatric illness. However, as previously stated, psychological and social factors also underpin traditionally neurological conditions such as unexplained neurological symptoms and non-epileptic attacks. Indeed, there is a spectrum of psychosocial components to all diseases. Having a biopsychosocial approach to illness is required not just for psychiatrists and neurologists but for all doctors. In an ideal world, our approach to all illness would include consideration of psychological and social factors, and would be indistinguishable between neurologists and psychiatrists.

Conclusion

There is no defining line between neurology and psychiatry. Furthermore, I contest that it is impossible to justify the separation of neurological and psychiatric illness on a rational basis. To a Martian, or anyone looking at the situation with a fresh pair of eyes, it is impossible to explain how we put brain disorders into either neurological or psychiatric boxes. This is because current classification is based on convention, tradition and quirks of history.

To our Martian, it would probably seem rational to have a degree of overlap in training between neurologists and psychiatrists. It would seem desirable that neurologists be competent in the management of psychiatric disorders, and vice versa. Unfortunately, this is not the case. In the UK, it is perfectly normal to train in one of these specialties with no exposure to the other, unlike in other European countries. Reference Oakley and Malik8 Nature does not respect our arbitrary categorisations and neither do our patients. It would surely benefit both specialties to integrate training pathways, as has been suggested by others. Reference Oakley, Jenkinson and Oyebode9

Footnotes

See pp. 105–7, this issue.

Declaration of interest

None.

References

1 Reynolds, EH, Trimble, MR. Epilepsy, psychiatry, and neurology. Epilepsia 2009; 50 (suppl 3): 50–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Fusar-Poli, P, Radua, J, McGuire, P, Borgwardt, S. Neuroanatomical maps of psychosis onset: voxel-wise meta-analysis of antipsychotic-naive VBM studies. Schizophr Bull 2012; 38: 1297–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Kanaan, R, Armstrong, D, Barnes, P, Wessely, S. In the psychiatrist's chair: how neurologists understand conversion disorder. Brain 2009; 132: 2889–96.Google ScholarPubMed
4 Barry, H, Hardiman, O, Healy, DG, Keogan, M, Moroney, J, Molnar, PP, et al. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an important differential diagnosis in psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 199: 508–9.Google ScholarPubMed
5 Williams, DR, Lees, AJ. Visual hallucinations in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a retrospective autopsy study. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 605–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Feinstein, A. Multiple sclerosis and depression. Mult Scler 2011; 17: 1276–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Engel, GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 34: 535–44.Google Scholar
8 Oakley, C, Malik, A. Psychiatric training in Europe. Psychiatrist 2010; 34: 447–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Oakley, C, Jenkinson, J, Oyebode, F. Psychiatric training for the next generation. Psychiatrist 2013; 37: 25–9.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

Fully inform the Martian

09 June 2015
Richard Braithwaite, Consultant Psychiatrist, Isle of Wight NHS Trust
At first glance, Reilly's thesis appears reasoned and structured (1). But his argument is flawed, such that he misses the most important reason for the distinction between psychiatry and neurology, with which a Martian would surely concur. Reilly states that "most organs (such as lungs, kidneys, hearts and eyes) are treated by a single medical specialty". Not so. A cardiac surgeon operates on the... More
Conflict of interest: None Declared

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 38
Total number of PDF views: 111 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 02nd January 2018 - 27th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
Open access
Hostname: page-component-898fc554b-gwqw7 Total loading time: 1.874 Render date: 2021-01-27T13:28:58.529Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "1", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The neurology-psychiatry divide: a thought experiment
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The neurology-psychiatry divide: a thought experiment
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The neurology-psychiatry divide: a thought experiment
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *