Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:07:24.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of Junior Doctor Handover in Holywell Hospital, Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Adam Flynn*
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Medical & Dental Training Agency, Belfast, United Kingdom
Richard Morrison
Affiliation:
Northern Health & Social Care Trust, Antrim, United Kingdom
Ryan O'Neill
Affiliation:
Northern Health & Social Care Trust, Antrim, United Kingdom
Jill Fulton
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Medical & Dental Training Agency, Belfast, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To achieve 100% of digital handover records being completed by doctors at end of shifts in Holywell Hospital, Northern Ireland.

Methods

Transition to completion of digital handover record began in 2019. This was initially audited during 2020-2021 with slowly worsening results. After this, audit data were no longer recorded.

Since becoming trainee representative in February 2022, I investigated, along with my colleagues, reasons as to why this was not being completed nor being achieved. Reasons established included unaware of necessity, chronic culture of not being completed, a lack of access to shared drive and outside locums covering shifts as well as a higher percentage of doctors who were on shorter 4 month rotations. Literature review around junior doctor handovers in other sites was also completed and analysed.

A Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycle was subsequently established taking these factors into account from August 2022 to January 2023 with a focus on information sharing, training at specific junior doctor changeover points, liaising with administration to ensure adequate access to handover and regular audit and feedback amongst junior doctors.

Results

From a new baseline of 5.36% of digital handovers being completed in February 2022 there has initially been a gradual increase noted at April 2022 to (35.00%) remaining relatively static into August 2022 (25.81%). Some of this related to doctors not having requisite access to shared folder.

However, percentage completed increased substantially after August 2022 with better administrative support and from September 2022 (70.00%) to December 2022 (88.71%) and into January 2023 (91.94%) handovers were completed.

Conclusion

Through a combination of better information sharing amongst junior doctors, signposting to digital handover, improvement of early access to requisite folder and specific teaching regarding handover at induction at all changeovers, stressing importance of completion from clinical governance perspective, there has been a genuine sea-change amongst junior medical staff that has included taking better ownership of the process and shared responsibility for it being completed.

This record-keeping improvement has been stark and maintained for a prolonged period, particularly from September 2022 and is now averaging over 90% being completed. There remains some issues regarding access if shift being covered by an outside locum doctor and this would be next targeted area with the goal of achieving 100% record of digital handover occurring.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.