Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T22:02:55.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Service Evaluation of Medical Undergraduate Psychiatry Placement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Nada Zahreddine*
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom
Julian Beezhold
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
Jenny Axford
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom
Ayomide Adebayo
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom
Rahna Theruvath-Chalil
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom
Oliver Jenkins
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom
Kristian McCormack
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom
Sohail Abrar
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

There are no clear guidelines for the optimal organisation of psychiatry placements for medical undergraduates. Moreover, the UK needs to enrol more psychiatry trainees. This service evaluation aimed to show that an efficient psychiatry placement can improve attitudes of students towards psychiatry and increase their likelihood to choose psychiatry.

Methods

We evaluated the efficacy of a new strategy for the psychiatry placement of 24 fourth-year medical students from the University of East Anglia during the academic year 2021/2022. The strategy consisted of having a 4-week placement in one of 3 wards at the Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust Woodlands Unit (PICU, acute male and female wards) with brief (one- to two-day) rotations across the wards, as well as the community team and individual areas of interest. This afforded students exposure to different settings, pathologies and levels of severity, with enough time in one service to allow integration into the team, participation in clinical and therapeutic activities and most important, observation of patient longitudinal improvement. Multidisciplinary teams were included by presenting the training as a win-win, and we relied on a good teaching culture at our Trust. We also offered a programmed induction day, a mid-placement meeting and an end-of-placement debrief. We evaluated the efficacy of the strategy using the Attitude Towards Psychiatry Questionnaire before and after the placement, as well as measuring overall satisfaction.

Results

The overall satisfaction score on a 5 point Likert scale was very good (M = 4.58; SD = 0.58). Mean ATP total score significantly improved from 116.50 (SD 9.49) to 133.00 (SD 8.68) over a maximum attainable score of 150 (F(1;23) = 69.70, p < .001, ηp2= .75), with 23 out of the 30 items having significantly improved individually as well. The reliability of the scale was high with a Cronbach's alpha of .81 before and .84 after the psychiatry placement. The question “I would like to be a psychiatrist” improved significantly from 2.54 to 3.25 on the 5 point Likert scale (F(1, 23) = 16.33, p < .001, ηp2= .42) with an increase in students answering “agree” or “strongly agree” from 16.7% to 45.8%. This improvement was significantly positively correlated with the overall satisfaction score (R = .528, p < .01).

Conclusion

Psychiatry placement for medical undergraduates is a valuable opportunity to improve their attitudes towards psychiatry and their likelihood of choosing psychiatry as a specialty. We present our strategy as a model toward these goals.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.