Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Callaway, Libby Winkler, Dianne Tippett, Alice Herd, Natalie Migliorini, Christine and Willer, Barry 2016. The Community Integration Questionnaire - Revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, Vol. 63, Issue. 3, p. 143.

    D’Cruz, Kate Howie, Linsey and Lentin, Primrose 2016. Client-centred practice: Perspectives of persons with a traumatic brain injury. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 30.

    Migliorini, Christine Enticott, Joanne Callaway, Libby Moore, Sophie and Willer, Barry 2016. Community integration questionnaire: Outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury and high support needs compared with multiple matched controls. Brain Injury, p. 1.

    Conneeley, Anne Louise 2012. Transitions and Brain Injury: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Journey of People with Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Impairment, Vol. 13, Issue. 01, p. 72.

    Sloan, Sue Callaway, Libby Winkler, Dianne McKinley, Kirsten and Ziino, Carlo 2012. Accommodation Outcomes and Transitions Following Community-Based Intervention for Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury. Brain Impairment, Vol. 13, Issue. 01, p. 24.

    Winkler, Dianne Farnworth, Louise Sloan, Sue and Brown, Ted 2011. Moving from aged care facilities to community-based accommodation: Outcomes and environmental factors. Brain Injury, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 153.

    Winkler, Dianne F. Farnworth, Louise J. Sloan, Sue M. and Brown, Ted 2011. Young people in aged care: progress of the current national program. Australian Health Review, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 320.

    Sloan, Sue Callaway, Libby Winkler, Dianne McKinley, Kirsten Ziino, Carlo and Anson, Katie 2009. Changes in Care and Support Needs Following Community-Based Intervention for Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury. Brain Impairment, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 295.


The Community Approach to Participation: Outcomes Following Acquired Brain Injury Intervention

  • Sue Sloan (a1), Libby Callaway (a2), Dianne Winkler (a3), Kirsten McKinley (a4), Carlo Ziino (a5) and Katie Anson (a6)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2012

Objective: To investigate the participation outcomes of individuals with severe acquired brain injury (ABI) who were provided with up to 12 months of intervention based on the Community Approach to Participation (CAP). Method: A case series study design was undertaken with a total of 85 participants from two private practices specialising in community-based, CAP rehabilitation for people with severe ABI. Inclusion criteria were the person had sustained an acquired brain injury, was aged over 18 years and had received up to 12 consecutive months of CAP input from one of the two practices within a three-year period between January 2004 and January 2007. Twenty-six of the 85 participants were an average of 343 days post injury (Early group) and 59 of the participants were an average of 10.2 years post injury (Late group). They were living in a range of community environments and residential facilities. Initial participants were identified for the study in January 2005. Data were gathered using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and Role Checklist (RC Part 1) at two time points: prior to intervention (baseline), and after a 12-month period or at discharge (TI). Within the intervention period, all participants received a customised community occupational therapy (OT) rehabilitation program based on the key principles of the CAP. Intervention focused on participation goals of the individual, and development of the associated skills that underpinned valued role performance. Results: Participants each received an average of 51.01 hours of CAP OT during the 12-month period of intervention. Considerable improvement was seen in functional independence, community integration, and role participation after intervention in both the Early and Late groups. A statistically significant increase in FIM™ and CIQ total scores was found for all participants from Baseline to T1. The number of roles in which participants engaged increased on average by almost one role per participant following intervention, from a mean of 3.06 to 3.99. Increased participation in volunteer, home maintainer, participant in organisations and hobbyist roles were most common. Conclusion: Increased functional independence, community integration, and participation in both the Early and Late groups over a 12 month period demonstrates the potential for improved participation outcomes for people with complex needs following ABI, even many years post injury.

Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: Sue Sloan, Senior Occupational Therapist/Neuropsychologist, Osborn Sloan & Associates Pty Ltd, 97 Princess Street, Kew VIC 3101, Australia.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Brain Impairment
  • ISSN: 1443-9646
  • EISSN: 1839-5252
  • URL: /core/journals/brain-impairment
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *