Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Elite science and the BBC: a 1950s contest of ownership

  • ALLAN JONES (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the elite world of institutional British science attempted to take control of the BBC's management of science broadcasting. Delegations of scientists met BBC managers to propose an increased role for scientists in planning science broadcasts to a degree that threatened to compromise the BBC's authority and autonomy. The culmination was a set of proposals to the Pilkington Committee in 1960, principally from the Royal Society and the British Association for the Advancement of Science, under which a scientist-manager was to be appointed head of a unified science division in the BBC. BBC managers resisted these proposals. The outcome, in 1964, was a compromise giving the scientists little of what they wanted, and proving practically and strategically useful for the BBC. The article frames the story as a contest of jurisdiction between elite science and the BBC, and draws on scholarship relating to the social nature of authority and professions, and to the popularization of science. It shows the fundamentally different beliefs held by the scientists and the BBC about the purpose of science broadcasts and about the nature of the audience. The historical narrative is based on unpublished archive documents, and it contributes to the small but growing body of work on the historical background to the presentation of science in the broadcast media.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A.H. Tanner , ‘Agenda building, source selection, and health news at local television stations’, Science Communication (2004) 25, pp. 350363

Grace Reid , ‘The television drama-documentary (dramadoc) as a form of science communication’, Public Understanding of Science (2012) 21, pp. 9841001

Markus Lehmkuhl , Christina Karamanidou , Tuomo Mörä , Kristina Petkova , Brian Trench and AVSA-Team, ‘Scheduling science on television: a comparative analysis of the representations of science in 11 European countries’, Public Understanding of Science (2012) 21, pp. 10021018

David Edgerton , ‘C.P. Snow as anti-historian of British science: revisiting the technocratic moment, 1959–1964’, History of Science (2005) 43, pp. 187208

Tom Burns , The BBC: Public Institution and Private World, London: Macmillan, 1977, p. 122

Allan Jones , ‘Five 1951 BBC broadcasts on automatic calculating machines’, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing (2004) 26(2), pp. 315

Jon Agar , ‘Science and information technology’, in Jonathan Hollowell (ed.), Britain since 1945, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, pp. 347364

Jane Gregory and Simon J. Lock , ‘The evolution of “public understanding of science”: public engagement as a tool of science policy’, Sociology Compass (2008) 2(4), pp. 12521265

John Ziman , ‘Public understanding of science’, Science, Technology and Human Values (1991) 16, pp. 99105

Massimiano Bucchi , ‘When scientists turn to the public: alternative routes in science communication’, Public Understanding of Science (1996) 5, pp. 375394

Christopher Dornan , ‘Some problems of conceptualizing the issue of “science and the media”’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication (1990) 7, p. 4871

Felicity Mellor , ‘Between fact and fiction: demarcating science from non-science in popular physics books’, Social Studies of Science (2003) 33, pp. 509538

Harry Collins and Robert Evans , ‘The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience’, Social Studies of Science (2002) 32, pp. 235296

Michael Polanyi , ‘The republic of science: its political and economic theory’, Minerva (1962) 1, pp. 5474

Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend , For and against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend Correspondence, ed. Matteo Motterlini , Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999, p. 27

Martin Lengwiler , ‘Participatory approaches in science and technology: historical origins and current practices in critical perspective’, Science, Technology, and Human Values (2008) 33, pp. 186200

Jeffrey Milland , ‘Courting Malvolio: the background to the Pilkington Committee on Broadcasting, 1960–62’, Contemporary British History (2004) 18, pp. 76102

Allan Jones , ‘Mary Adams and the producer's role in early BBC science broadcasts’, Public Understanding of Science (2012) 21, pp. 968983

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 17 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 115 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.