Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T08:12:33.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of animated stories to improve music education practices of trainee primary school teachers in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

José María Esteve-Faubel*
Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain
María Teresa Botella-Quirant
Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain
Rosa Pilar Esteve-Faubel
Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain
Corresponding author: José María Esteve-Faubel; Email:
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


This article analyses an interdisciplinary educational experience combining music, ICT, language and art to create an animated story with active listening as a means of improving knowledge of music education practices. The method consisted of a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive study, with a semi-structured open-ended interview and analysis of the corresponding portfolio by both students and teachers with the aim of encouraging systematic reflection on practices and optimising teaching-learning in the nature of action research. The research population consisted of 104 students of the Bachelor’s Degree in Teaching of the Faculty of Education of the University of Alicante (Spain). The results indicated an improvement in music education practices relating to active listening following the pedagogical intervention, leading to the conclusion that inclusion of ICT in music education facilitates real and effective insertion and enhances students’ autonomy in the process of acquisition of musical skills.

Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press


One of the challenges currently faced by the education system is the need to adapt to the growing needs of an increasingly digitalised society (Agrawal & Mittal, Reference AGRAWAL and MITTAL2018). Advances in information and communications technology (ICT) reflect the need to establish a relationship between the education and the technical training of both the general public (Becker et al., Reference BECKER2017; Maderick et al., Reference MADERICK, ZHANG, HARTLEY and MARCHAND2016; Romero-García et al., Reference ROMERO-GARCÍA, BUZÓN-GARCÍA and DE PAZ-LUGO2020) and those responsible for changes in pedagogical processes in the classroom, that is teachers, regardless of the education level (Esteve-Faubel & Oller Benítez, Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, OLLER BENÍTEZ and Roig-Vila2019).

For this reason, over the last decade the Spanish university system and, more specifically, the Faculties of Education that train early childhood and primary education teachers, among others, have included at least one subject with a value of 6 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) in their curricula to directly address ICT with the aim of achieving an adequate level of proficiency in this area.

Teacher digital competence (TDC) refers to the ability to use ICT correctly as part of a permanent teaching-learning process, which entails new ways of approaching educational action. This has led to a change from a paradigm focusing solely on teaching to one where learning is based on both students’ work and the establishment of specific methodological strategies (Lockee & Wang, Reference LOCKEE, WANG, Spector, Merrill, Elen and Bishop2014; Nicolaou et al., Reference NICOLAOU, MATSIOLA and KALLIRIS2019).

However, the use of ICT does not imply radical transformations of the purposes or meaning of learning, nor a belief that ICT constitutes an end in itself (Lim & Oakley, Reference LIM, OAKLEY, Tay and Lim2013), but rather a search for new pedagogical procedures. The question is whether the use of ICT can contribute to improve the learning process of future primary school teachers in terms of music education innovation.

The scientific literature concerning teacher training related with Digital Competence and Digital Skills in higher education emphasises that these aspects are increasingly present in the classroom at a general level (Instefjord & Munthe, Reference INSTEFJORD and MUNTHE2017) and also at a music-specific level (Savage, Reference SAVAGE2005; Stowell & Dixon, Reference STOWELL and DIXON2014; Wise, Reference WISE2016).

Teachers are also vital in this process, given that they are responsible for educating and training future generations (Admiraal et al., Reference ADMIRAAL2017; Mills & Murray, Reference MILLS and MURRAY2000). Teachers in general tend to use ICT either for personal use or as tools to search for information. Therefore, training in this area is more instrumental and theoretical rather than practical-educational, for example in relation to problem-solving items, management of over-information and critical thinking (Prensky, Reference PRENSKY2001). This implies that musical knowledge is not necessarily generated in line with the European Digital Competence Framework (National Institute of Educational Technologies and Teacher Training, 2017a, b; Kluzer & Pujol Priego, Reference KLUZER and PUJOL PRIEGO2018) and the Goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2015). In other words, the mere use of music software such as score editors does not imply the generation of musical knowledge through the use of ICT in line with the parameters of the European Digital Competence Framework or the 2030 Agenda mentioned above.

In relation to university students, although they are considered digital natives, as opposed to teachers, who are seen as digital immigrants (Bayne & Ross, Reference BAYNE, ROSS, Land and Bayne2011), they also suffer the same limitations when it comes to generating knowledge (Kirschner & De Bruyckere, Reference KIRSCHNER and DE BRUYCKERE2017). Nonetheless, they have a positive attitude towards the use of ICT in teaching practice (Hammond et al., Reference HAMMOND, REYNOLDS and INGRAM2011). All studies of TDC stress that teachers have a direct need to acquire an adequate level for their professional practice (Nelson et al., Reference NELSON, VOITHOFER and CHENG2019), although they also highlight one problem being the scarcity of subjects in this field during teacher training studies (Instefjord & Munthe, Reference INSTEFJORD and MUNTHE2017).

Music listening plays a fundamental role in music learning (Elliott, Reference ELLIOTT1995; Haack, Reference HAACK and Colwell1992). However, the actual listening to a musical work, whether “classical” in the broad sense of the term or contemporary, presents intrinsic difficulties (non-traditional use of sonorous material) and extrinsic difficulties (limited exposure) that impact the listener’s cognitive processes (Esteve-Faubel et al., Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, FRANCÉS-LUNA, STEPHENS and BARTEL2016). For these reasons, since the 1970s different strategies have been sought to achieve intentional and focused listening through active listening as a means of arriving at an effective way of appreciating music (Haack, Reference HAACK and Colwell1992). Some of the various approaches developed to achieve this purpose include the simultaneous presentation of visual materials (Geringer et al., Reference GERINGER, CASSIDY and BYO1997), visual listening or perceptual-motor maps (Gromko & Poorman, Reference GROMKO and POORMAN1998) and musicograms (Boal-Palheiros & Wuytack, Reference BOAL-PALHEIROS and WUYTACK2006). This pedagogical approach seeks to overcome the difficulty of remembering the different fragments of music that make up the work due to the fact that music perception occurs over time (Tillmann & Bigand, Reference TILLMANN and BIGAND2004).

With reference to ICT music, authors including Biasutti et al. (Reference BIASUTTI, HENNESSY and DE VUGT-JANSEN2015), Muhonen (Reference MUHONEN2016), Seddon and Biasutti (Reference SEDDON and BIASUTTI2008) and Thorpe (Reference THORPE2017), among others, indicate the need to propose innovative face-to-face and/or virtual learning environments in order to apply didactic models that favour the acquisition of musical knowledge regardless of the starting level of these future teachers. The studies by Cain (Reference CAIN2004) and Hunt and Kirk (Reference HUNT and KIRK1997) also highlight the need to establish specific methodological strategies in the music classroom and that music-specific ICT is already a reality in the classroom (Savage, Reference SAVAGE2005; Stowell and Dixon, Reference STOWELL and DIXON2014; Wise, Reference WISE2016).

The working hypothesis is that an interdisciplinary educational intervention involving education and ICT in the field of music not only leads to improved knowledge of teaching practices but it can also allow transfer of these learning approaches to their professional practice.

To confirm this hypothesis, among other strategies a pedagogical model was designed based on audiovisual resources for the subject of Listening as an Educational Element in the Music Teaching Department of the Bachelor’s Degree in Primary Education at the University of Alicante. The purpose of the study was to put this model into practice as a means of motivating and improving analysis of the works proposed during the activity of active musical listening.

For all the above reasons, this study aims to further develop knowledge in this area and provide a basis for teachers to apply this pedagogical approach in a given learning situation in primary classrooms, especially in the case of interdisciplinary activities.

It should be pointed out that the legal regulations governing the key competences of compulsory education training indicate that, among others, competence in linguistic communication, digital competence and personal, social and learning to learn competence are essential in certain learning situations, and it is therefore necessary to provide future teachers with resources that can help them to provide a global response to this pedagogical approach.

Animation is used in education for the construction and communication of scientific understanding. Multimedia products facilitate the construction of knowledge (Hoban, Reference HOBAN2020; Mayer & Moreno, Reference MAYER and MORENO2002; Unsworth, Reference UNSWORTH and Unsworth2020) and comprise an additional instrument for the design and creation of teaching actions for training of future teachers (Esteve-Faubel & Oller Benítez, Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, OLLER BENÍTEZ and Roig-Vila2019; Esteve-Faubel et al., Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, OLLER-BENITEZ and APARICIO-FLORES2020; Hoban, Reference HOBAN2020), without forgetting that the ultimate aim is the aural recognition of the musical elements of the work, and learning of these actions for their subsequent application in primary education classes.

This approach focuses on the action research paradigm, which aims to develop a substantive theory of action in the classroom (Elliott, Reference ELLIOTT1990) whereby individualistic culture is converted into a cooperative culture that allows development of new professional knowledge needed to resolve complex practical problems. In light of the above, the objectives of the current study are as follows:

  1. A. To determine the prior knowledge to ensure effective development of the educational-musical project.

  2. B. To examine digital competence as a determining factor for its possible use in future music teaching work.

  3. C. To analyse the methodological positions deriving from the pedagogical intervention and carry out planning, implementation and evaluation of the action.

Educational context in Spain

In order to understand the current proposal, the following aspects should be borne in mind:

  1. a) In the Spanish primary education system, music teachers are one of the specialist teachers that work together with general teachers, and they assume responsibility for teaching music education at this stage of education.

  2. b) The Primary Education curriculum, apart from contemplating a transversal approach in all subjects, also works specifically on music in three blocks; a) listening, perception and musical repertoire, comprising both more popular traditional music and avant-garde music, along with rhythms and melodies from different countries and cultures as a reflection of the multicultural reality of a globalised world; b) musical performance, comprising expressive and creative processes such as interpretation, improvisation and creation through vocals, musical instruments and other electronic devices and knowledge and use of specific codes and techniques.

  3. c) Future teachers receive training as general teachers in the Faculties of Education with a total of 240 credits, and in the case of specialist music teachers, they complete 30 credits specifically for music.

  4. d) Access to this specialisation is open to both students with a high level of previous musical knowledge and also to those who lack such knowledge.


The method consists of a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive study comprising both a semi-structured open-ended interview and portfolio analysis. Given that the aim is to analyse and interpret the concepts of the research topic in a given social context, this approach is justified as it facilitates access to the underlying information, attitudes, experiences, perceptions and beliefs of the participants and reflections on their thoughts and experiences (Briggs, Reference BRIGGS2008; Duggleby, Reference DUGGLEBY2005). This type of approach also allows analysis and interpretation of contextualised responses in a given social environment (Clandinin & Murphy, Reference CLANDININ and MURPHY2009), namely the Teaching Degree of the Faculty of Education of the University of Alicante.

The sample was made up of 104 students of the Bachelor’s Degree in Teaching, selected by way of accidental non-probability sampling which was accessible to the researchers and therefore non-random, from the 2016–2017 academic year through to the 2020–21 academic year.

The objectives of the study were explained to all the informants, who participated on a voluntary basis, and there was no incentive for their collaboration. The subject chosen to implement the study was Listening as an Educational Element, which is taught in the first term of the 4th academic year of the Degree.

Field work

The pedagogical intervention proposed consists of project-based learning of an interdisciplinary nature, the end result of which is the production of an animated story which combines audio and images through cooperative work. The basis for the intervention is the selection and analysis of a musical work combined with the disciplines of art, language and ICT, with these latter elements being used as tools for audio recording and editing, creation of images and video editing.

The initial premise is to use these audiovisual resources to create interdisciplinary material that overcomes individualism and compartmentalisation of knowledge.

The elements of the study are as follows: a) musical: selection of the work that will serve as the central focus of the project, analysis of the musical recording, creation, manipulation and editing of an audio file and processing and use of voice for the narration; b) artistic: consisting of the specific features of the image, selection of the technique, selection of the main and secondary images, creation and editing; c) linguistic: relating to the creation of a coherent story with a narrative structure and the correct use of appropriate terminology.

Five planning processes were designed to implement a proposal based on both projects and collaborative work:

  • Phase 1: Music. At the start of the course in the first week, working groups are established based on a cooperative learning structure. The number of members is always four, except when the total number of students is not a multiple of this number, in which case the corresponding group always consists of three students.

The groups are heterogeneous in terms of their level of knowledge, with assignment of specific roles in accordance with the totality of phases in the design. In addition, a portfolio is prepared for the “animated story” project, including all the phases and the final project, together with a reflection on the different phases that shape the nature of the project.

Musical knowledge is not assessed in the classical sense by means of a test. The students group themselves into three large groups in a very objective manner and without any affective impact.

Group 1 is made up of students whose knowledge of music is derived solely from compulsory education. They do not tend to read or sing sheet music of average difficulty nor do they have mastery of a musical instrument. Among other reasons, this low level of training may be directly related to the limited time allocated to music, which ranges from 45 to 90 minutes per week depending on the level during primary and secondary education, despite the fact that the legislation imposes high curricular requirements (Esteve-Faubel, Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL2019).

Group 2 consists of students who receive extracurricular musical training in musical societies which are deeply rooted in the Valencian Community. These students read sheet music well and have mastered a musical instrument or sing. Finally, Group 3 is made up of students who study in music conservatories and have a high level of musical training.

In terms of the specific musical elements, firstly a work is selected that must be very expressive and with a certain time limit: a minimum of one minute and a maximum of four minutes. After selecting the work, the structural and technical-compositional analysis is carried out, identifying the most outstanding elements in the recording and firstly establishing a tempo table as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Tempo Table Based on the Structure of the Musical Work

After completing this structural framework, a complete timeline analysis is carried out in minutes and seconds, which then forms the basis for the narrative development.

The musical pieces or fragments are chosen by the students. They may or may not have been worked on in class previously but they must be very expressive, that is the melodies evoke narrative elements, images, etc., such as the fifth movement of the Symphonie Fantastique by Hector Berlioz “Dream of a Witches’ Sabbath” or “Frere Jacques” used as a funeral march in the third movement of Symphony No. 1 “Titan” by Gustav Mahler.

  • Phase 2: Language. The construction of the language is based on the characteristics of the musical work and its most salient elements which are identified as being relevant to the musical and narrative discourse. Based on these, the theme of the story, the characters and the plot are developed. This narrative is incorporated on the timeline prepared in Phase 1, with the relevant information coinciding with the times of the different elements in the recording.

  • Phase 3: Creation of the audio file. A voice recording is made adjusted to the time marked on the timeline and an audio file is created. Work is carried out on vocal technique, breathing and projection of the spoken voice, paying special attention to the expressiveness of the tone, modulation and diction. The merging of the audio files of the musical work and the voice story created is carried out using an audio editor freely chosen by the students. Free software such as Audacity is recommended for audio editing and digital sound recording.

  • Phase 4: Art. Selection of the type of image, the technique and the resources necessary for its preparation and creation of the storyboard using free software such as Storyboard That. The number of scenes in the animation and the illustrations that each of the scenes will contain is chosen, associating each of them with the times marked on the timeline.

  • Phase 5: Video production and editing. Phases 3 and 4 are linked using free software such as OpenShot. The digital platform Padlet is used to share and disseminate the projects created, as it allows creation of collaborative walls. The teachers of the subject carry out the registration process and the students access their specific wall via a link and a password. The different projects are inserted on the wall in the specific section of the group. This will have a column layout, with one column for each group. The projects consist of the video created and the description, the analysis and group reflection on its constituent phases.

The project evaluation is the final phase of the project and contains the following items:

  • Title of the work and justification for its selection.

  • Project phases: planning and implementation.

  • Coordination of the group, both physically in the classroom and online.

  • Tools used during the process and for execution of the product.

  • Difficulties encountered.

It should be noted that the students were introduced to the listening prior to the study as part of the active listening process. For example, one of the works used in this manner was “Hungarian Dance No. 1” by Johannes Brahms. This short musical piece consists of three brief musical fragments that repeat and contrast with each other. Brevity, repetition and contrast aid the listener’s concentration, an essential factor when introducing active listening, with verbal expression acting as a facilitator of listening in this case.

The first step is to create a text consisting of four distinct parts (I + A + B + C) which also makes sense taken as a whole, as is the case of the musical structure. All the students learn the text part by part, but always reading it with the exact rhythm and tempo that characterises the piece they are going to listen to.

The roles are then assigned. A soloist will interpret a brief introduction (I). One group recites A, another group recites B, and then, they all come together in C, that is the orchestral tutti. Once this has been worked on and assimilated, the actual listening takes place. At this time, the students react with joy upon recognising the piece and they are subsequently asked to search among the musical repertoire to identify pieces for which they can apply this and other procedures worked on – corporal, verbal, vocal, instrumental, etc. – depending on the educational intention of the musical fragment chosen. This is also a way of achieving active musical listening by associating it with a symbolic visual representation that the students are familiar with.

Analysis strategies

Two sessions were designed: an initial exploratory session at the beginning of the course to set up the working groups and learn more about their beliefs, self-perceptions, possibilities for analysis of musical listening and subsequent application to teaching, level of digital competence and so on, and a final confirmatory session at the end of the course to analyse whether or not there was an evolution in their learning following the intervention.

The focus group technique was used for this purpose, with the groups consisting of between six and nine students in each of the phases. The average duration of the interviews was around 45 minutes, always ending with saturation of the discourse, with a total of three focus groups for each of the academic years analysed 2016–17 (7 + 7 + 6), 2017–18 (8 + 8 + 8), 2018–19 (8 + 8 + 7), 2019–20 (6 + 6 + 7) and (6 + 6 + 6). All the sessions were recorded with the consent of the participating students. Subsequently, both the two scheduled sessions and the information from the corresponding portfolios were imported into the qualitative analysis software Atlas.ti7. The three researchers conducted a year-by-year individual analysis of the qualitative content, assigning emergent codes to sentences or paragraphs with the same meaning and grouping codes to identify categories. Once the various emergent code maps had been obtained by each researcher, they were pooled to examine commonalities and divergences through triangulation of the results. It was unnecessary to redefine the codes or categories in any of the sessions. Minor nuances that emerged did not constitute real discrepancies and were addressed respectively in each of the joint working sessions, reaching a 97% consensus.

An inductive and deductive analysis was used to determine the organisational structure of the code map from which the resulting categories emerge. One portfolio was analysed per working group, that is five portfolios corresponding to the 2016–17, 2019–20 and 2020–21 academic years and six portfolios corresponding to 2017–18 and 2018–19. The results are presented in tables that group the codes in each of the categories, and the comments shown were chosen due to their clarity and representativeness.


The socio-demographic characteristics as set out in Table 2 indicate that the age range in all cases is between 21 and 22 years; 48% are male and 52% female. No significant differences were found both in terms of this aspect and the analysis of student opinions, and so the results are presented as if they were a single group. 55.77% of the students had a low level of musical knowledge, compared to 44.23% who had previous knowledge, with a resulting imbalance in the classroom for the development of musical skills.

Table 2. Socio-demographic Characteristics

1No: Without studies; 2Elementary; 3Last year of Professional Studies; 4Higher Studies.

The average time spent on each of the phases was as follows:

  1. 1. Selection, analysis of the work and recording of highlights, timing in minutes and seconds and selection of the theme: 2 hours.

  2. 2. Development and drafting of the work and framing within the time in oral format: 2 hours.

  3. 3. Storyboard and recording: 2 hours.

  4. 4. Selection and creation of images according to the text: 4 hours.

  5. 5. Staging and editing: 2 hours

After analysing their opinions, focus groups and portfolios and assessing their project, four categories emerged:

  1. 1) Self-perception at the beginning of the course regarding musical listening analysis and its application to teaching;

  2. 2) Self-perception of the level of digital competence at the beginning of the course;

  3. 3) Evaluation of the project and degree of application;

  4. 4) Improvement of knowledge following the intervention.

The first two are prior to the educational intervention and the last two after the corresponding portfolios have been completed and analysed.

With regard to the first category (see Table 3), it is noteworthy that 55.77% considered their musical knowledge would not allow them to tackle the subject successfully. 31.73% believed they could achieve the objective, and 12.50% indicated that they had full mastery.

Table 3. Self-perception at the Beginning of the Course Concerning Musical Listening Analysis and its Application to Teaching

With regard to the degree of acquisition, the students believe they have in terms of their level of digital competence, almost all of them considered it to be high or very high. However, when posed with the levels of competence taken from the Common Digital Competence Framework for Teachers (National Institute of Educational Technologies and Teacher Training, 2017a, b), with respect to 1. Information and Data Literacy; 2. Communication and Collaboration; and 3. Digital Content Creation, the levels were more realistic (see Table 4), and this trend was even more pronounced at the start of the project:

“I can’t believe it. I thought I had it all clear, but now…”

Table 4. Digital Competence Level Derived from the Common Digital Competence Framework for Teachers

In general, they mostly showed user-level mastery of word processing, social media, file sharing, etc., but with deficiencies in specific areas such as manipulation, creation and editing of audio, image and video files and in terms of platforms for team collaboration.

As for the evaluation of the project and its degree of application, basically two blocks of results were extracted, one of which is generic and the other regarding the improvement of knowledge following the intervention. 100% of students had a positive opinion (see Table 5).

Table 5. General Assessment of the Pedagogical Proposal

The codes grouped in the category of knowledge improvement (see Table 6) obtained very good results that recognise the essential guiding role of the teacher in the whole process: “Without you, this would be impossible.”

Table 6. Knowledge Improvement

The results in Tables 4, 5 and 6 are also a faithful reflection of what the students express in the portfolios. Use of portfolios is important as their analysis facilitates evaluation, training, innovation and research, and they act as a constant guide in light of the disparity of prior knowledge of music among students undertaking teacher training studies (Esteve-Faubel et al., Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, MOLINA VALERO and STEPHENS2009; Esteve-Faubel et al., Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, STEPHENS and MOLINA VALERO2013). It also allows both students and teachers to critically reflect (Bird Reference BIRD, Millman and Darling-Hammond1997; Cheng et al., Reference CHENG, CHEN, CHANG, LI, CHEN and HUANG2018; Shulman, Reference SHULMAN and Lyons1998; van der Schaaf et al., Reference VAN DER SCHAAF, DONKERS, SLOF, MOONEN-VAN LOON, VAN TARTWIJK, DRIESSEN, BADII, SERBAN and TEN CATE2017), analyse the effectiveness of teamwork, learn about research and creativity, etc., with the aim of supporting and contributing towards adapted musical training through documentation of their learning experience (Orland-Barak & Maskit, Reference ORLAND-BARAK and MASKIT2017).

Teachers use portfolios to reflect on the coherence of what they intend to teach, allowing them to develop their critical thinking regarding educational action. The portfolio shows not only the learning progress made with the work assigned but also how the students perceive and internalise it, highlighting their autonomous work, their progress and evidence of their achievements (Hamilton, Reference HAMILTON2018).


The comments of the students and the results obtained reflect the importance placed on innovative face-to-face and/or virtual learning environments in order to apply teaching models that foster the acquisition of musical knowledge, regardless of the starting level of these future teachers (Biasutti et al., Reference BIASUTTI, HENNESSY and DE VUGT-JANSEN2015; Muhonen, Reference MUHONEN2016; Seddon & Biasutti, Reference SEDDON and BIASUTTI2008; Thorpe, Reference THORPE2017).

The action research approach applied in this project consisting of an animated story facilitated development by the students of skills in the musical elements of listening through a specific application involving progressive use of digital competence through manipulation of images, audio and video and achievement of an interdisciplinary vision of learning through cooperative work. This is a means of harnessing the pedagogical potential of emerging technologies (Ferrari, Reference FERRARI2013) to improve skills in the music teaching-learning process and meet current educational challenges.

Despite the positive assessments of the pedagogical intervention carried out, it should be noted that in order to adopt correct music teaching approaches it is necessary to know how to sequence the salient elements of the listening exercise that are linked to the areas referred to in the music curriculum which must be applied by music teachers (Hennessy, Reference HENNESSY2000). This requires a balance between training as a general teacher and as a music specialist (Esteve-Faubel et al., Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, MOLINA VALERO and LÓPEZ DE REGO FERNÁNDEZ2007; Esteve-Faubel et al., Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, MOLINA VALERO and STEPHENS2009; Esteve-Faubel et al., Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL, STEPHENS and MOLINA VALERO2013), given that construction of the music teaching approach must be based on mastery of the technical-compositional and structural elements of the work and its recognition in the listening exercise. Furthermore, it must be taken into account that this educational action is aimed at the general public; that is to say, primary music education is not synonymous with conservatory education, but rather with students acquiring the skills corresponding to their educational level (Esteve-Faubel, Reference ESTEVE-FAUBEL2019; Holden & Button, Reference HOLDEN and BUTTON2006).

The results reflect the need for training in ICT, but with the specific aim of evolving towards more specific knowledge, at all times accompanied by methodologies and applications developed by the future teachers themselves that allow them to incorporate ICT into their daily work (Wise et al., Reference WISE, GREENWOOD and DAVIS2011). This situation reinforces the importance of teaching-learning processes in university classrooms based on cooperative training where the student is an active agent in their learning process. This ensures that each student, regardless of the courses studied or mastery of the subject at the start, feels involved and effectively develops skills, with the teacher acting as a guide throughout the process.

According to Beck (Reference BECK, Rowell, Bruce, Shosh and Riel2017), experiences like these are positive for students as examples of real incorporation through practice and also due to the fact that it is not a one-off intervention but rather a cyclical one with constant feedback. However, it is equally true that interdisciplinary work in university classrooms is less common due, among other reasons, to the fixed and relatively inflexible timetable structure, the compartmentalisation of different subjects and the resulting dynamics that hinder its application.

This pedagogical approach explores an interdisciplinary vision and application of knowledge that is both motivating and creative given that it is related to their real world (Bolden, Reference BOLDEN2009), as well as including and integrating a type of educational intervention that moves them away from a totally passive role in their training (Bacher, Reference BACHER2009; Cook-Sather, Reference COOK-SATHER2007) and allows them to acquire the skills and attitudes they need to successfully deal with the complexities of specific real-life situations and demands.

The construction and improvement of musical and digital knowledge with the aim of producing an applicable end product is achieved through action, production and research, working together with their peers to build knowledge cooperatively in a heterogeneous group.

Although this article focuses on improvement of music studies through the use of ICT and audiovisual and linguistic tools, it can be seen how this collaborative work also reinforces soft skills and validates use of the digital portfolio as a self-regulator of learning in the music education classroom and a source of constant feedback both for the students themselves and for the teachers.

As has been made clear, the teacher assumes a key role to guide and reorient the students, but above all as a researcher of classroom problems. This is the origin of the cooperative work model proposed, which aims to form the basis of a culture of collective, non-individualistic teaching action in the future work carried out by university students who complete their training as primary teachers.

This methodological approach can be used by them as a model as it includes collaborative work for the organisation and development of specific proposals, as well as adaptation to the contexts and demands of the environment. At the same time, these tasks are closely related to the creative, adaptive and interdisciplinary responses that will form part of their future professional reality. Within this context, the inclusion of ICT as an inseparable aspect of educational practice at a global level (Tondeur et al., Reference TONDEUR, VAN KEER, VAN BRAAK and VALCKE2008) can help to achieve real and effective insertion that facilitates independent learning of musical skills, the ultimate aim of the entire project.

While the animation activity proposed in this study has covered the perspectives of musical aural analysis, digital competence and the interdisciplinary nature of learning, along with feedback to foster reflection-action, the fact that follow-up cannot be performed when the participants are actually teaching limits the results and the possible improvements of any initiative of this type. However, when teacher training students spend short periods of time in schools to carry out practicums, their reports often include activities of this type which are carried out in the primary classroom.


The music teaching training model presented not only brings students closer to real situations typical of their future work, it also offers them the possibility of broadening their previous musical beliefs and improving their acquisition of a series of practical musical abilities, skills, knowledge, values and attitudes, among others, which all combine to achieve a specific end. The results show the advantages of using ICT (visual materials in this case) as a means of achieving the proposed goal of improving music education and in a manner where music listening plays a fundamental role in the learning process. In addition, in a certain manner the activity proposed is perceived as a playful activity. This fosters participation and motivation, key aspects to increase students’ knowledge of the musical topic while at the same time developing research and personal skills. To this end, students need guidance regarding their approach to situations requiring a combination of knowledge, intellectual skills, techniques, attitudes and values from the viewpoint of both a general teacher and a music specialist in order to successfully execute projects that are duly connected with reality.


ADMIRAAL, W., et al. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology into K–12 instruction: Evaluation of a technology-infused approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 105120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AGRAWAL, A. K. & MITTAL, G. K. (2018). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21st century: ICT as a change agent for education. Multidisciplinary Higher Education, Research, Dynamics & Concepts: Opportunities & Challenges for Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, pp. 7683.Google Scholar
BACHER, S. (2009). Tatuados por los medios: dilemas de la educación en la era digital. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
BAYNE, S. & ROSS, J. (2011). ‘Digital native’ and ‘digital immigrant’ discourses. In Land, R. & Bayne, S. (eds.), Digital Difference: Perspectives on Online Learning (pp. 159169). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECK, C. (2017). Informal Action Research: The nature and contribution of everyday classroom inquiry. In Rowell, L. L., Bruce, C. D., Shosh, J. M. & Riel, M. M. (eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research (pp. 3748). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECKER, S. A., et al. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
BIASUTTI, M., HENNESSY, S. & DE VUGT-JANSEN, E. (2015). Confidence development in non-music specialist trainee primary teachers after an intensive programme. British Journal of Music Education, 32(2), 143161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIRD, T. (1997). El portafolios del profesor: un ensayo sobre las posibilidades. In Millman, J. & Darling-Hammond, L. (eds.), Manual para la evaluación del profesorado, (pp. 332–351). Madrid: La Muralla.Google Scholar
BOAL-PALHEIROS, G. & WUYTACK, J. (2006). Effects of the ‘musicogram’ on children’s musical perception and learning. In ICMPC (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, (pp. 12641271). Bologna.Google Scholar
BOLDEN, B. (2009). Teaching composing in secondary school: A case study analysis. British Journal of Music Education, 26(2), 137152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRIGGS, J. E. (2008). Young women and politics: An oxymoron? Journal of Youth Studies, 11(6), 579592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAIN, T. (2004). Theory, technology and the music curriculum. British Journal of Music Education, 21(2), 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHENG, Y.-C., CHEN, L. -L., CHANG, Y. -S., LI, T.-C., CHEN, C.-J., & HUANG, L.-C. (2018). The effectiveness of learning portfolios in learning participation and learners’ perceptions of skills and confidence in the mother of preterm infant. Midwifery, 62, 8691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CLANDININ, D. J. & MURPHY, M. S. (2009). Comments on Coulter and Smith: Relational ontological commitments in narrative research. Educational Researcher, 38(8), 598602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOK-SATHER, A. (2007). Resisting the impositional potential of student voice work: Lessons for liberatory educational research from poststructuralist feminist critiques of critical pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 389403.Google Scholar
DUGGLEBY, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 832840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ELLIOTT, D. J. (1995). Music Matters a New Philosophy of Music Education. New York, USA; Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ELLIOTT, J. (1990). La investigación-acción en educación. Ediciones Morata.Google Scholar
ESTEVE-FAUBEL, J. M. (2019). La educación musical y el comparatismo. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 34, 4161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESTEVE-FAUBEL, J. M., FRANCÉS-LUNA, B., STEPHENS, J. P. & BARTEL, L. (2016). Cognition of stability in atonal music in teenagers with no musical experience. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 26, 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESTEVE-FAUBEL, J. M., MOLINA VALERO, M. Á. & LÓPEZ DE REGO FERNÁNDEZ, C. (2007). El futuro de los estudios de maestro especialista en música. Música y educación: Revista trimestral de pedagogía musical, 20(72), 2134.Google Scholar
ESTEVE-FAUBEL, J. M., MOLINA VALERO, M. Á. & STEPHENS, J. (2009). A qualitative assessment of students’ experiences of studying music: A Spanish perspective on the European credit transfer system (ECTS). Music Education Research, 11(2), 241265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESTEVE-FAUBEL, J. M. & OLLER BENÍTEZ, A. (2019). Hacia un uso de las herramientas audiovisuales para la transformación social: análisis de las percepciones de los futuros docentes. In Roig-Vila, R. (ed.), Investigación e innovación en la Enseñanza Superior: Nuevos contextos, nuevas ideas (pp. 11071115). Barcelona: Octaedro.Google Scholar
ESTEVE-FAUBEL, J.-M., STEPHENS, J. & MOLINA VALERO, M. Á. (2013). A quantitative assessment of students’ experiences of studying music: A Spanish perspective on the European credit transfer system (ECTS). British Journal of Music Education, 30(1), 5984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESTEVE-FAUBEL, R. P., OLLER-BENITEZ, A. & APARICIO-FLORES, M. P. (2020). Perceptions of future teachers of audiovisual education and communication. Challenges in training for a sustainable education. Sustainability, 12(24), 10296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FERRARI, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
GERINGER, J. M., CASSIDY, J. W. & BYO, J. L. (1997). Nonmusic majors’ cognitive and affective responses to performance and programmatic music videos. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(2), 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GROMKO, J. E. & POORMAN, A. S. (1998). Does perceptual-motor performance enhance perception of patterned art music? Musicae Scientiae, 2(2), 157170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAACK, P. (1992). The acquisition of music listening skills. In Colwell, R. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning: a project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 451465). Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
HAMILTON, M. (2018). Bridging the gap from teacher to teacher educator: The role of a teaching portfolio. Studying Teacher Education, 14(1), 88102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAMMOND, M., REYNOLDS, L. & INGRAM, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 191203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HENNESSY, S. (2000). Overcoming the red-feeling: The development of confidence to teach music in primary school amongst student teachers. British Journal of Music Education, 17(2), 183196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOBAN, G. (2020). Slowmation and blended media: Engaging students in a learning system when creating student-generated animations. Learning from Animations in Science Education (pp. 193208). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLDEN, H. & BUTTON, S. (2006). The teaching of music in the primary school by the non-music specialist. British Journal of Music Education, 23(1), 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUNT, A. & KIRK, R. (1997). Technology and music: Incompatible subjects? British Journal of Music Education, 14(2), 151161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INSTEFJORD, E. J. & MUNTHE, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 3745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍAS EDUCATIVAS Y FORMACIÓN DEL PROFESORADO (Ed) (2017a). Comparativa Marco Competencia Digital Docente y Marco Europeo: DigCompEdu. Seville: JCR.Google Scholar
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍAS EDUCATIVAS Y FORMACIÓN DEL PROFESORADO (Ed) (2017b). Marco común de competencia digital docente. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.Google Scholar
KIRSCHNER, P. A. & DE BRUYCKERE, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLUZER, S. & PUJOL PRIEGO, L. (2018). DigComp into Action: Get Inspired, Make it Happen. A User Guide to the European Digital Competence Framework . Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
LIM, C. P. & OAKLEY, G. (2013). Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in primary education. In Tay, L. Y. & Lim, C. P. (eds.), Creating Holistic Technology-Enhanced Learning Experiences: Tales from a Future School in Singapore, (pp. 118). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.Google Scholar
LOCKEE, B. B. & WANG, F. (2014). Visual arts education. In Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J. & Bishop, M. J. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, (pp. 583590). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MADERICK, J. A., ZHANG, S., HARTLEY, K. & MARCHAND, G. (2016). Preservice teachers and self-assessing digital competence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 326351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAYER, R. E. & MORENO, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 8799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILLS, J. & MURRAY, A. (2000). Music technology inspected: Good teaching in Key Stage 3. British Journal of Music Education, 17(2), 129156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUHONEN, S. (2016). Students’ experiences of collaborative creation through songcrafting in primary school: Supporting creative agency in ‘school music’ programmes. British Journal of Music Education, 33(3), 263281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NELSON, M. J., VOITHOFER, R. & CHENG, S.-L. (2019). Mediating factors that influence the technology integration practices of teacher educators. Computers & Education, 128, 330344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICOLAOU, C., MATSIOLA, M. & KALLIRIS, G. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching methodologies through audiovisual media. Education Sciences, 9(3), 196209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ORLAND-BARAK, L. & MASKIT, D. (2017). Portfolio as ‘Documenting Experience’. Methodologies of Mediation in Professional Learning, (pp. 7590). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRENSKY, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 16.Google Scholar
ROMERO-GARCÍA, C., BUZÓN-GARCÍA, O. & DE PAZ-LUGO, P. (2020). Improving future teachers’ digital competence using active methodologies. Sustainability, 12 (18), 77987813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAVAGE, J. (2005). Working towards a theory for music technologies in the classroom: How pupils engage with and organise sounds with new technologies. British Journal of Music Education, 22(2), 167180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEDDON, F. & BIASUTTI, M. (2008). Non-music specialist trainee primary school teachers’ confidence in teaching music in the classroom. Music Education Research, 10(3), 403421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHULMAN, L. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. In Lyons, N. (ed.), With Portfolio in Hand: Validating the New Teacher Professionalism (pp. 23–37). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
STOWELL, D. & DIXON, S. (2014). Integration of informal music technologies in secondary school music lessons. British Journal of Music Education, 31(1), 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THORPE, V. (2017). Assessing complexity. Group composing for a secondary school qualification. British Journal of Music Education, 34(3), 305320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TILLMANN, B. & BIGAND, E. (2004). The relative importance of local and global structures in music perception. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62(2), 211222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TONDEUR, J., VAN KEER, H., VAN BRAAK, J. & VALCKE, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNITED NATIONS (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
UNSWORTH, L. (2020). A multidisciplinary perspective on animation design and use in science education. In Unsworth, L. (ed.), Learning from Animations in Science Education Innovating in Semiotic and Educational Research, (pp. 322). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN DER SCHAAF, M., DONKERS, J., SLOF, B., MOONEN-VAN LOON, J., VAN TARTWIJK, J., DRIESSEN, E., BADII, A., SERBAN, O. & TEN CATE, O. (2017). Improving workplace-based assessment and feedback by an E-portfolio enhanced with learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 359380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WISE, S. (2016). Secondary school teachers’ approaches to teaching composition using digital technology. British Journal of Music Education, 33(3), 283295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WISE, S., GREENWOOD, J. & DAVIS, N. (2011). Teachers’ use of digital technology in secondary music education: Illustrations of changing classrooms. British Journal of Music Education, 28(2), 117134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Tempo Table Based on the Structure of the Musical Work

Figure 1

Table 2. Socio-demographic Characteristics

Figure 2

Table 3. Self-perception at the Beginning of the Course Concerning Musical Listening Analysis and its Application to Teaching

Figure 3

Table 4. Digital Competence Level Derived from the Common Digital Competence Framework for Teachers

Figure 4

Table 5. General Assessment of the Pedagogical Proposal

Figure 5

Table 6. Knowledge Improvement