Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T19:22:20.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The digestion by cattle of silage-containing diets fed at two dry matter intakes

1. Digestion of organic matter and nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

J. A. Rooke ,
H. A. Greife  and
D. G. Armstrong
J. A. Rooke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NEl 7RU
H. A. Greife
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NEl 7RU
D. G. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NEl 7RU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In a 4 × 4 Latin square experiment four cattle were given in two meals per d diets consisting of (g/kg dry matter (DM)) 500 barley, 400 grass silage and 100 soya-bean meal. The diets were given at either 1.15 (L) or 2.3 times (H) maintenance energy requirements and the soya-bean meal was either untreated (U) or formaldehydetreated (T).

2. A 24 h collection of duodenal digesta and a 7 d collection of faeces were made using chromium sesquioxide for flow estimation and 35S as a marker of microbial nitrogen entering the small intestine. Samples of rumen fluid were also taken for estimation of lumen pH, ammonia and volatile fatty acid concentrations.

3. Spot samples of duodenal digesta were obtained after administration of Cr2O3,-mordanted silage-fibre and soya-bean meal, to determine the rates of outflow of these markers from the rumen. Similar samples were also obtained after cessation of a continuous intraruminal infusion of ruthenium phenanthroline, 35S and CoEDTA.

4. Incubations of each feedingstuff in porous synthetic fibre (psf) bags were carried out in the rumen and the rates of N disappearance from the bags determined.

5. Increasing DM intake significantly ( P < 0.001) increased the quantities of organic matter (OM), total N and amino acid-N entering the small intestine and amounts subsequently voided in the faeces. Apparent digestibilities of OM and N were unaffected by DM intake; the proportions of total digestible OM digested in the rumen were significantly lower (P < 0.01) at the higher level of DM intake.

6. Formaldehyde treatment of the soya-bean meal increased the quantities of N entering the small intestine; these increases were not significant.

7. Increased DM intake increased the quantities of both microbial N (P < 0.001) and undegraded feed N (P < 0.01) entering the small intestine; HCHO-treatment also significantly (P < 0.05) increased the quantities of undegraded feed N entering the small intestine. The efficiency of microbial N synthesis within the lumen was not significantly affected by dietary treatments whereas apparent feed N degradability was reduced significantly ( P < 0.05) both by increasing DM intake and by HCHO-treatment of the soya-bean meal.

8. Rates of disappearance of N from psf bags in the rumen were different for different feedingstuffs. However, for a given feedingstuff, the rate of N disappearance was not affected by the diets fed.

9. The rates of decline in marker concentrations measured in duodenal digesta were significantly increased as DM intake increased with the exception of Cr2O2-soya-bean meal. The markers could be ranked (P < 0.05) in the following order of increasing outflow rate: ruthenium phenanthroline, 35S-labelled amino acids and Cr2O2-silage fibre < Cr2O3-soya-bean meal < CoEDTA.

10. Estimates of the degradabilities of feedingstuffs were calculated from N disappearance rates from psf bags and either experimentally determined outflow rates or those proposed by the Agricultural Research Council (1984). Such estimates for the degradability of the whole diet were then compared with those determined in vivo using 35S as a marker.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , May 1985 , pp. 691 - 708
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirement of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock Supplement no. 1. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1981). In Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures, pp. 225–233 [Hacker, J. B., editor]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Kellaway, R. C., Thomson, D. J., Macrae, J. C., Evans, C. C. & Wallace, A. S. (1978). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, P. A., Almond, M., Harrison, D. G., Rowlinson, P., Rooke, J. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1979). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38, 148A.Google Scholar
Colucci, P. E., Chase, L. E. & Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Journal of Dairy Science 65, 1445–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottyn, B. G. & Boucque, C. V. (1968). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16, 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deswysen, A., Vanbelle, M. & Focart, M. (1978). Journal of the British Grassland Society 33, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. C., Lascano, C. & Matis, J. H. (1979). Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 10, 166–167.Google Scholar
Evans, C. C., Macrae, J. C. & Wilson, S. (1977). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. (1981 a). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1980). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 1129–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Boston, R. C. (1983). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Griffiths, D. A. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, G., Ørskov, E. R. & Smart, R. (1979). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. G., Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J. & Osborn, D. F. (1975). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M., Christopherson, R. J. & Milligan, L. P. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 39, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. (1981). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeniman, N. P. & Armstrong, D. G. (1979). Journal of Agricultura1 Science, Cambridge 93, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mader, T. L., Teeter, R. G. & Horn, G. W. (1984). Journal of Animal Science 58, 208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Aitchison, E. M. (1981). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 691–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Miller, E. L. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 43, 504–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1982). In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production, Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 6, pp. 79–88 [Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G., editors]. Thames Ditton: British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants: Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1982). The Analysis of Agricultural Materials, 2nd ed. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Mugdal, V. D., Dixon, R. M., Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1982). Journal of Animal Science 54, 1051–1055.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G. & Sutton, J. D. (1969). British Journal of Nutrition 23, 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overend, M. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production, Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 6. pp. 162–163 [Thomson, D. J.Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G., editors]. Thames Ditton: British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Rees, M. C.& Little, D. A. (1980). Journal of Agricultura1 Science, Cambridge 94, 485–438.Google Scholar
Rohr, K., Brandt, M., Castrillo, O., Lebzien, P. & Assmus, G. (1979). Landbauforschung Volkenrode 29, 32–40.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1983). In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition II, pp. 235–238 [Pion, R., Arnal, M. and Bonin, D., editors]. ParisINRA.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Brookes, I. M. & Armstrong, D. G. (1983 a). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Greife, H. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1983 b). Grass and Forage Science 38, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Greife, H. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1984). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 695–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Norton, B. W. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1980). Maximum Likelihood Program. Rothamsted: Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Beever, D. E. & Kaiser, A. G. (1982). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, S., Van der Koelen, C. J. & Van Vuuren, A. M. (1979). Livestock Production Science 6, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, T. N., Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1971). International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 22, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ternouth, J. H., Poppi, D. P. & Minson, D. J. (1979). Proceedings of the Nutritional Society of Australia 4, 152.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. & Chamberlain, D. G. (1982). In Silage for Milk Production, pp. 63–102 [Rook, J. A. F. and Thomas, P. C., editors]. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying/Ayr: Hannah Research Institute.Google Scholar
Udén, P., Colucci, P. E. & Van Soest, P. J. (1980). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udén, P., Rounsaville, T. R., Wiggans, G. R. & Van Soest, P. J. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verite, R., Journet, M. & Jarrige, R. (1979). Livestock Production Science 6, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J., David, D. J. & Ismaa, O. (1962). Journal of Agriculrural Science, Cambridge 59, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, R. A. & Owens, F. D. (1983). Journal of Animal Science 56, 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar